Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.aviation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

aus.aviation Profile…
 Up
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: Stealth Pilot
Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:14

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
wrote:
>A brand-new A340 doing full-throttle tests
>slipped it's brakes and/or jumped it's chocks,
>climbed a blast shield, dropped and broke the
>cockpit off.
>
>http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1293784/M/
>
>http://www.avweb.com/newspics/airbus_a340-600_ground-test_accident_02_large.jpg
>
>A couple people hurt, probably at least a
>couple people looking for new jobs.

doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
did?

Stealth Pilot
39 Comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: cavelamb himself
Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:16

Stealth Pilot wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>A brand-new A340 doing full-throttle tests
>>slipped it's brakes and/or jumped it's chocks,
>>climbed a blast shield, dropped and broke the
>>cockpit off.
>>
>>http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1293784/M/
>>
>>http://www.avweb.com/newspics/airbus_a340-600_ground-test_accident_02_large.jpg
>>
>>A couple people hurt, probably at least a
>>couple people looking for new jobs.
>
>
>
> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it ...
Show full article (0.73Kb)
no comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: cavelamb himself
Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:21

cavelamb himself wrote:
>> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
>> did?
>>
>> Stealth Pilot
>
> It's a BIG airplane.
>
It can't be built as _tough_ as you'd want because of _weight_ issues.
>
>

Man, I gotta have coffee before hitting the et this early...
no comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: Sylvia Else
Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:50

Stealth Pilot wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
> wrote:
>
>> A brand-new A340 doing full-throttle tests
>> slipped it's brakes and/or jumped it's chocks,
>> climbed a blast shield, dropped and broke the
>> cockpit off.
>>
>> http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1293784/M/
>>
>> http://www.avweb.com/newspics/airbus_a340-600_ground-test_accident_02_large.jpg
>>
>> A couple people hurt, probably at least a
>> couple people looking for new jobs.
>
>
> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
> did?
> ...
Show full article (0.87Kb)
no comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: Jim Wilkins
Date: Nov 21, 2007 04:26

On Nov 21, 6:14 am, Stealth Pilot aeroplanes.com.au>
wrote:
...
> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
> did?
> Stealth Pilot

Why? That type of accident will break a steel ship in half.
no comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: Doug Miller
Date: Nov 21, 2007 05:32

In article <13k858shlns9h8d@corp.supernews.com>, GB kickindanuts.threefiddy.com> wrote:
>Stealth Pilot aeroplanes.com.au> wrote in
>news:gm48k3dek02dd2p83sckbu9mdotnjpv6v1@4ax.com:
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
>> wrote:
>>>A brand-new A340 doing full-throttle tests
>>>slipped it's brakes and/or jumped it's chocks,
>>>climbed a blast shield, dropped and broke the
>>>cockpit off.
>>>http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1293784/M/
>>>http://www.avweb.com/newspics/airbus_a340-600_ground-test_accident_02_l
>>>arge.jpg
>>>A couple people hurt, probably at least a
>>>couple people looking for new jobs.
>> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
>> did?
>
> It seems to have held up pretty well. I'm more concerned by the original
>poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined. ...
Show full article (1.36Kb)
no comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: Michael A. Terrell
Date: Nov 21, 2007 09:14

cavelamb himself wrote:
>
> It's a BIG airplane.
>
> It can't be built as tought as you'd want because of eight issues.
>
> Keep that in mind when traveling!

Which eight issues? ;-)

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
no comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: Rich Grise
Date: Nov 21, 2007 09:19

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:32:52 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
> In article <13k858shlns9h8d@corp.supernews.com>, GB
>>poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>>hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined.
>
> ???
>
>>I can't for the life of me figure out how he derived that from the
>>information provided to date.
>
> And I can't for the life of me figure out how *you* derived that from
> the original post (quoted in its entirety above). What on earth are you
> talking about?

"A couple of people". Apparently, English isn't his first language.

Cheers!
Rich
2 Comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: cavelamb himself
Date: Nov 21, 2007 09:30

Rich Grise wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:32:52 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
>
>>In article <13k858shlns9h8d@corp.supernews.com>, GB
>
>
>>>poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>>>hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined.
>>
>>???
>>
>>
>>>I can't for the life of me figure out how he derived that from the
>>>information provided to date.
>>
>>And I can't for the life of me figure out how *you* derived that from
>>the original post (quoted in its entirety above). What on earth are you
>>talking about?
>
> ...
Show full article (0.79Kb)
no comments
Re: OT - Bad day at Airbus         


Author: Mark F
Date: Nov 21, 2007 13:00

cavelamb himself wrote:
> Rich Grise wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:32:52 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
>>
>>> In article <13k858shlns9h8d@corp.supernews.com>, GB
>>
>>
>>>> poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>>>> hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined.
>>>
>>> ???
>>>
>>>
>>>> I can't for the life of me figure out how he derived that from the
>>>> information provided to date.
>>>
>>> And I can't for the life of me figure out how *you* derived that from
>>> the original post (quoted in its entirety above). What on earth are you
>>> talking about?
>> ...
Show full article (0.92Kb)
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
Airbus airbus Crash Crash Crashalt.france ·
1 2 3 4