|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Stealth PilotStealth Pilot Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:14
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
wrote:
doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
did?
Stealth Pilot
|
| |
|
| | 39 Comments |
|
  |
Author: cavelamb himselfcavelamb himself Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:16
Stealth Pilot wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it ...
|
| Show full article (0.73Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: cavelamb himselfcavelamb himself Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:21
cavelamb himself wrote:
>> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
>> did?
>>
>> Stealth Pilot
>
> It's a BIG airplane.
>
It can't be built as _tough_ as you'd want because of _weight_ issues.
>
>
Man, I gotta have coffee before hitting the et this early...
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: Nov 21, 2007 03:50
Stealth Pilot wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
> did?
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.87Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Jim WilkinsJim Wilkins Date: Nov 21, 2007 04:26
On Nov 21, 6:14 am, Stealth Pilot aeroplanes.com.au>
wrote:
...
> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
> did?
> Stealth Pilot
Why? That type of accident will break a steel ship in half.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Doug MillerDoug Miller Date: Nov 21, 2007 05:32
>Stealth Pilot aeroplanes.com.au> wrote in
>news:gm48k3dek02dd2p83sckbu9mdotnjpv6v1@4ax.com:
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:20:06 -0800, Jim Stewart jkmicro.com>
>> wrote:
>> doesnt it worry anyone that the fuselage disintegrated as much as it
>> did?
>
> It seems to have held up pretty well. I'm more concerned by the original
>poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined. ...
|
| Show full article (1.36Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Michael A. TerrellMichael A. Terrell Date: Nov 21, 2007 09:14
cavelamb himself wrote:
>
> It's a BIG airplane.
>
> It can't be built as tought as you'd want because of eight issues.
>
> Keep that in mind when traveling!
Which eight issues? ;-)
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Rich GriseRich Grise Date: Nov 21, 2007 09:19
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:32:52 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
>>poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>>hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined.
>
> ???
>
>>I can't for the life of me figure out how he derived that from the
>>information provided to date.
>
> And I can't for the life of me figure out how *you* derived that from
> the original post (quoted in its entirety above). What on earth are you
> talking about?
"A couple of people". Apparently, English isn't his first language.
Cheers!
Rich
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
  |
Author: cavelamb himselfcavelamb himself Date: Nov 21, 2007 09:30
Rich Grise wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:32:52 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
>
>
>
>>>poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>>>hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined.
>>
>>???
>>
>>
>>>I can't for the life of me figure out how he derived that from the
>>>information provided to date.
>>
>>And I can't for the life of me figure out how *you* derived that from
>>the original post (quoted in its entirety above). What on earth are you
>>talking about?
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Mark FMark F Date: Nov 21, 2007 13:00
cavelamb himself wrote:
> Rich Grise wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:32:52 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>> poster's assertion that those who were injured and those who are job-
>>>> hunting as a result of the incident are somehow romantically inclined.
>>>
>>> ???
>>>
>>>
>>>> I can't for the life of me figure out how he derived that from the
>>>> information provided to date.
>>>
>>> And I can't for the life of me figure out how *you* derived that from
>>> the original post (quoted in its entirety above). What on earth are you
>>> talking about?
>> ...
|
| Show full article (0.92Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|