Re: Lancaster Bomber
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.aviation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

aus.aviation Profile…
 Up
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Ned
Date: Aug 8, 2007 05:58

GB wrote:
Hmmm...Cockpit controls obviously modified for dual pilot operation.

WW2 Lancaster operations were all AFAIK single pilot. Which is why
navigators with a just few hours up were so well regarded in case the
skipper took a hit. A few managed the heroic feat of bringing the
damaged aircraft back and putting it on the ground.
14 Comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Gordon Beaman
Date: Aug 11, 2007 17:11

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:58:39 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
>GB wrote:
>Hmmm...Cockpit controls obviously modified for dual pilot operation.
>
>WW2 Lancaster operations were all AFAIK single pilot. Which is why
>navigators with a just few hours up were so well regarded in case the
>skipper took a hit. A few managed the heroic feat of bringing the
>damaged aircraft back and putting it on the ground.

NAVIGATORS?!?...first time I've ever heard that...have heard it said
about Flight Engineers though, never Navigators...you got a cite for
me?...

--

Gord
(use gordon in email)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: RT
Date: Aug 12, 2007 01:36

"Gordon Beaman" islandtelecom.com> wrote in message
news:4tjsb3pta9e0iqfu275cbahdiunjo7d1i1@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:58:39 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
>
>>GB wrote:
>>Hmmm...Cockpit controls obviously modified for dual pilot operation.
>>
>>WW2 Lancaster operations were all AFAIK single pilot. Which is why
>>navigators with a just few hours up were so well regarded in case the
>>skipper took a hit. A few managed the heroic feat of bringing the
>>damaged aircraft back and putting it on the ground.
>
> NAVIGATORS?!?...first time I've ever heard that...have heard it said
> about Flight Engineers though, never Navigators...you got a cite for
> me?...
Show full article (0.89Kb)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Peter and Susan
Date: Aug 12, 2007 03:58

"RT" nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:5i7v3hF3mlbi7U1@mid.individual.net...
>> "Gordon Beaman" islandtelecom.com> wrote in message
> news:4tjsb3pta9e0iqfu275cbahdiunjo7d1i1@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:58:39 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
>>
>>>GB wrote:
>>>Hmmm...Cockpit controls obviously modified for dual pilot operation.
>>>
>>>WW2 Lancaster operations were all AFAIK single pilot. Which is why
>>>navigators with a just few hours up were so well regarded in case the
>>>skipper took a hit. A few managed the heroic feat of bringing the
>>>damaged aircraft back and putting it on the ground.
>>
>> NAVIGATORS?!?...first time I've ever heard that...have heard it said
>> about Flight Engineers though, never Navigators...you got a cite for
>> me?...
> ...
Show full article (2.20Kb)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Peter and Susan
Date: Aug 12, 2007 04:05

Opps the following slipped out of my computer before I added my name and a
URL about the author http://www.airwaysmuseum.com/John%%20Laming%%20biog.htm

Google "John Laming" will also find more interesting aviation material.

Cheers
Peter Cokley

"Peter and Susan" hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:newscache$sgqnmj$dce1$1@cedric.onthenet.com.au...
> I found some material about the second pilot on Lancaster Mk.1V [Lincoln]
> planes.
>...
Show full article (1.62Kb)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Ned
Date: Aug 12, 2007 06:35

RT wrote:
> "Gordon Beaman" islandtelecom.com> wrote in message
> news:4tjsb3pta9e0iqfu275cbahdiunjo7d1i1@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:58:39 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
>>
>>> GB wrote:
>>> Hmmm...Cockpit controls obviously modified for dual pilot operation.
>>>
>>> WW2 Lancaster operations were all AFAIK single pilot. Which is why
>>> navigators with a just few hours up were so well regarded in case the
>>> skipper took a hit. A few managed the heroic feat of bringing the
>>> damaged aircraft back and putting it on the ground.
>> NAVIGATORS?!?...first time I've ever heard that...have heard it said
>> about Flight Engineers though, never Navigators...you got a cite for
>> me?...
>
> Not exactly a cite, but one of my school teachers, Brian Joseph
>Mattingley, ...
Show full article (5.89Kb)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Brian Colwell
Date: Aug 12, 2007 17:47

"Gordon Beaman" islandtelecom.com> wrote in message
news:4tjsb3pta9e0iqfu275cbahdiunjo7d1i1@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:58:39 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
>
>>GB wrote:
>>Hmmm...Cockpit controls obviously modified for dual pilot operation.
>>
>>WW2 Lancaster operations were all AFAIK single pilot. Which is why
>>navigators with a just few hours up were so well regarded in case the
>>skipper took a hit. A few managed the heroic feat of bringing the
>>damaged aircraft back and putting it on the ground.
>
> NAVIGATORS?!?...first time I've ever heard that...have heard it said
> about Flight Engineers though, never Navigators...you got a cite for
> me?...
>
> --
> ...
Show full article (1.25Kb)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Gordon Beaman
Date: Aug 12, 2007 21:28

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:35:13 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
>RT wrote:
>> "Gordon Beaman" islandtelecom.com> wrote in message
>> news:4tjsb3pta9e0iqfu275cbahdiunjo7d1i1@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:58:39 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
> ...
Show full article (6.99Kb)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Nick O'Tyme
Date: Aug 12, 2007 23:18

"Gordon Beaman" islandtelecom.com> wrote in message
news:32mvb358kpa16ah7a10ojo75of66lv62o1@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:35:13 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:
>
Snip, snip
>
> I flew for another 20 years on various large a/c after them and
> believe me the Lancaster was indeed a damned dangerous a/c to fly.
>
> They had very little aileron authority although the elevator and
> rudders were pretty good, also the combination of large soft tires,
> quite long travel and spongy oleo legs placed much too far forward,
> plus that huge high lift wing made every landing an event to dread.
>
> --
>
> Gord
> (use gordon in email)

Hi Gordon,
Show full article (1.01Kb)
no comments
Re: Lancaster Bomber         


Author: Coop
Date: Aug 13, 2007 02:23

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:35:13 +1000, Ned aioe.org> wrote:

(Lots of good stuff snipped for brevity)
>
>All other crew members also deservedly got gongs.
>
>McGillivray's prior experience was link trainer only.
>
I remember reading of a real "seat of the pants" exercise in a
Lancaster, where one of the crew (I don't think it was the pilot) kept
the aircraft flying by sitting on the control wheel and pushing
against the opposite bulkhead/seat/whatever with his feet. With the
assistance of another crew member they kept it going like this for
quite a long time. Can't remember if they made it back home or dropped
into one of the occupied countries, but it was a remarkable feat, with
a successful forced landing at the end of it.

Coop
no comments

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
US-PA: Lancaster-Senior Accountant in Lancaster for one of the Top 100...alt.bestjobsusa.pennsylvania.jobs ·
US-PA: Lancaster-Sr Assistant Manager, Factory, Lancaster Outletsalt.bestjobsusa.pennsylvania.jobs ·
1 2