I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.aviation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

aus.aviation Profile…
 Up
I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: veritas
Date: Nov 4, 2007 18:06

15 Comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: Rob
Date: Nov 4, 2007 18:59

veritas wrote:

She only had 22kg in hand luggage.

I reckon they should start weighing all the hand luggage. Its amazing
just how much people struggle with placing their "7kg" luggage into the
overhead lockers, wonder things don't collapse. But obviously she did!
> Now I wonder who could this be ???
>
> http://www.clinchnevillelong.com.au/images/stories/photo_sophie_letherbarrow.jpg
>
>
> ....and her employer perhaps ???
>
> http://www.clinchnevillelong.com.au
>
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: Marts
Date: Nov 5, 2007 01:32

veritas wrote...

ROFL...

She probably thought that she'd intimidate them with "I'm a lawyer and I'm gonna
do you like a dinner..."

Good to see that she failed.
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: Marts
Date: Nov 5, 2007 01:39

Rob wrote...
> I reckon they should start weighing all the hand luggage. Its amazing
> just how much people struggle with placing their "7kg" luggage into the
> overhead lockers, wonder things don't collapse. But obviously she did!

I wonder if this is an appropriate time to rehash and old story of mine. Back in
81 when I was doing an Asian tour, we were on a CX flight from Hong Kong to
Manila. Anyway, lots of the locals were on the flight, as to be expected. Some
of the crap that they brought on board was amazing, including one guy who had a
kayak. No shit. He had it in the aisle.

When I recounted this tale, JB was telling us that he's seen pax bring washing
machines on board...

Things might've changed a bit since then, it seems that stupidity is still a
rampant virus that refuses to die...
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: Pits
Date: Nov 5, 2007 17:06

On Nov 5, 11:59 am, Rob mine.com> wrote:
> veritas wrote:
>
> She only had 22kg in hand luggage.
>
> I reckon they should start weighing all the hand luggage. Its amazing
> just how much people struggle with placing their "7kg" luggage into the
> overhead lockers, wonder things don't collapse. But obviously she did!
>
>> Now I wonder who could this be ???
>
>
>> ....and her employer perhaps ???
>

Christ !!! You see this "legal firms " web site !! Looks like we
have finally sunk to the depths of American litigation logic :(
Show full article (1.72Kb)
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: veritas
Date: Nov 5, 2007 18:27

Pits wrote:
> On Nov 5, 11:59 am, Rob mine.com> wrote:
>> veritas wrote:
>> She only had 22kg in hand luggage.
>>
>> I reckon they should start weighing all the hand luggage. Its amazing
>> just how much people struggle with placing their "7kg" luggage into the
>> overhead lockers, wonder things don't collapse. But obviously she did!
>>
>>> Now I wonder who could this be ???
>>> http://www.clinchnevillelong.com.au/images/stories/photo_sophie_lethe...
>>> ....and her employer perhaps ???
>>> http://www.clinchnevillelong.com.au
>
> Christ !!! You see this "legal firms " web site !! Looks like we
> have finally sunk to the depths of American litigation logic :(
>
> If ever there was a frivolous and vexatious action -this is it .
> ...
Show full article (1.99Kb)
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: Sylvia Else
Date: Nov 5, 2007 20:59

Marts wrote:
> veritas wrote...
>
>
> ROFL...
>
> She probably thought that she'd intimidate them with "I'm a lawyer and I'm gonna
> do you like a dinner..."
>
> Good to see that she failed.
> ...
Show full article (0.70Kb)
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: veritas
Date: Nov 5, 2007 21:44

Sylvia Else wrote:
> Marts wrote:
>> veritas wrote...
>>
>>
>> ROFL...
>>
>> She probably thought that she'd intimidate them with "I'm a lawyer and
>> I'm gonna ...
Show full article (1.01Kb)
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: Ned
Date: Nov 6, 2007 05:13

veritas wrote:
> I have always tended to think the worst of
> members of the legal profession. :(
>
Then I'll bet my left one you're still pissed they got
Haneef off the hook.

Am I right or am I right? Of course I am.

So why not really get into the so called "War against Terror"?

Plenty of opportunities for a free beat up of a lawyer here

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jIE0IUn4WIiaMBpjG8SI_6H5RXzgD8SO0T0G0
no comments
Re: I hope Miz Leatherbarrow had to pay substantial costs [Judge dismisses Qantas case]         


Author: Pits
Date: Nov 6, 2007 13:17

On Nov 5, 6:32 pm, Marts yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> veritas wrote...
>
>> Now I wonder who could this be ???
>
>
>> ....and her employer perhaps ???
>
>
> ROFL...
>
> She probably thought that she'd intimidate them with "I'm a lawyer and I'm gonna
> do you like a dinner..."
>
> Good to see that she failed.
Show full article (1.65Kb)
no comments
1 2