It has always intrigued me who has accepted responsibility for the Port
Hedland Ansett Viscount Crash. Was it TAA, the erstwhile owners of the
aicraft or Ansett, not sure if any.
Parts of the AC are still there.
Yagu
"JD"
spamlesstpgi.com.au> wrote in message
news:46783ea1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...> RT wrote:
>
>>
>> "Paul Saccani"
omen.net.au> wrote in message
>> news:crhf73lpcraliquj65b8et1p64fnnue75s@4ax.com...>>> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:06:06 GMT, veritas
coldmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>Paul Saccani wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:29:41 +1100, Graeme Cant
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ISTR that one as being due to an undetected manufacturing defect,
>>>>> unique to that aircraft. Kind of like the less unique defects found
>>>>> in Viscount wings....
>>>
>>>>What Viscount wing defect was that?
>>>>
>>> The one where some clown forced bushings into the main spar, rather
>>> than reaming to the correct size. This initiated fatigue cracks in a
>>> part of the spar that was difficult to inspect.
>>
>>
>>> At least two
>>> viscounts lost a wing on RPT flights in Australia, with total loss of
>>> life on both occasions.
>
> From memory the Winton one the wing spar failure resulted from an
> uncontained engine fire that in turn was the result of an incorrect
> assembly of an auxillary drive on the engine. Nothing to do with the wing
> itself, except it was not fireproof.
>
> Both were maintenance problems, not airframe defects except in the sense
> that it was possible (easy?) to do the wrong thing.
> JD
