| Re: Flight Data Recorders |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile
Author: RTRT Date: Sep 13, 2008 03:11
"Paul Saccani" omen.net.au> wrote in message
news:j7amc4l6e7orn82ddc19ml0h4q9alp803s@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:01:32 +1000, "RT" nowhere.com.au>
> wrote:
>>That really is a fascinating idea - sort of poor man's differential
>>GPS.....
>
> Yes, that order of precision and accuracy for navigation.
>
>>If you kept track of the average position by the GPS and the difference
>>from
>>there to the inertial position, you'd be able calculate the inertial drift
>>and thence correct the GPS to inertial accuracy :-)
>
> That's about it. I thought it was used from scratch for aircraft
> systems with combined INS and GPS - the cost of the filter is a
> fraction of the cost of the system, particularly if their is already
> room available on the computing side of things to do it. Its
> certainly done with the PPS and SPS on military systems.
>
> However, on reflection, there are probably many aircraft where GPS has
> been added to an existing inertial based system and the integration
> only goes so far as to allow a position update to correct drift.
>
>>Many thanks - I'll have a prowl...tho me and Matlab never really got
>>on....
>
> Me two...
Heh. Mentioned this to Her Indoors. She was mightily unimpressed. "Of
course we were updating inertial nav - using radar - now do you want a cup
of tea?"
Friggin hell! :-)
Mind you, her field was ICBMs, not IC domestic transport :-)
(For those that tuned in late, my Missus was a fairly senior control systems
engineer in the old USSR)
|