Tim Carlson wrote:

No there are more than one engineer supporting this. There is a very
long list if you would just google it. There are more and more coming
out. The movement has only shown growth margins comparable to a
promising IPO. It is plausible that the executive of engineering
societies are controlled by conflicting interests.

What I find so very interesting about this video interview with Jowenko
is that before the interview starts Jowenko doesn't think that WTC7 was
suspicious. But the awakening that I hope you would notice is that the
REASON Jowenko doesn't think there is anything suspicious about WTC7
collapse is BECAUSE he thought that the contolled demolition was
officially recognised. HE thought that they decided to bring down the
building quickly because it had received damage substantial enough to
justify rebuilding on the site.
He had guessed that the building was brought down in the few days after
9/11 because this is obviously the best time to do it - the whole area
was a demolition disaster!
But notice that Jowenko
(i) didn't realise that the WTC7 came down on 9/11 - he thought it was
the next day ot day after.
(ii) he didn't know that the official reports were claiming the
building was a gravity collapse ininiated by damage and fire
(iii) he didn't know about the $5.5 billion insurance claim of Larry
Silverstein.
(iv) he had not examined previously enough photographic and video
footage to correctly appraise the collapse environment and manner -
i.e. he didn't realise that the building was a complete symetrical
footprint classic CD pile of collpase debris.

And the list goes on! Im thinking backwards - these observations are so
obvious to me that I feel like I'm explaining it to a child.

Really, fighting for 911 Truth on the front-line has dumbed me down.
Its like working in a kindergarten - in the end you start speaking and
thinking in terms of a childish audience.

JUST GOOGLE FOR 911 TRUTH EXPERTS AND THE LIST WILL SHOCK YOU TO THE
FOUNDATIONS OF YOUR VALUES AND JUDGEMENTS.

THE ONLY REASON THAT ANYONE CONTINUES TO BELIEVE THE OFFICIAL STORY IS
BECAUSE THEY ARE RELYING ON THE MAINSTREAM PRESS TO TELL THEM
UNANOMOUSLY THAT IT IS OTHERWISE.

DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH!

There are three films you could watch to at least come to the
conclusion that the official story is FAR from the consensus of witness
and expert testimony. The official story is not supported by the
collection of reports. The official story must be an invention of the
mainstream media network and parroted by the government.

Say that you were witness amongst 100,000 to a local event - not
through television but in person, eyes wide open. You know that your
witnessing is one in hundred thousand and so you will still need to go
to watch and even report to the television and media that night to see
and contribute to what you assume is a reliable and objective summary
of events organised by a large institution called the MAINSTREAM
MEGAPHONE.
Anyone who controls the Mainstream Megaphone contol that part of the
national audience who have assumed that the source is credible. One
assumes that the MM is credible because they have seen that 99.99%% of
the reporting has been reliable. They have also assumed that the
reporting that had seemed reliable had BEEN reliable when in actual it
may have been misleading yet they as the individual never found out
about its unreliability because the same MM never corrected the report.

Fundamental assumptions can have drastic impression on final
conclusions.
When was the last time you evaluated your fundamental assumptions?

A useful accompanyment to the meditation of reevaluating your
fundamental assumptions is the double-pendulum. To watch the double
-pendulum. To feel and hear its vibrations. You can purchase them via
google. It is worth letting your children grow up with one.

Do you remember what the most valuable commodity in the world is? The
human being.