|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: SnapperSnapper Date: Aug 28, 2008 19:46
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24260846-661,00.html
I'm not sure that I am understanding what the cylinder actually did. The article
said that the cy. shot up into the main cabin, hitting the door then falling
down and exiting the hole in the fuselage.
Usually, when I've seen oxy cylinders fail it's been due to a problem around the
neck where a fitting has snapped off. However, in this case it appears that the
cylinder's base may have ruptured, thus ripping the entire bottle away from its
fixtures.
I'm surprised that it was able to fall back through the hole that it made in the
floor, unless it was an exceptionally large one.
Whatever, it certainly did some damage.
|
| |
|
| | 65 Comments |
|
  |
Date: Aug 28, 2008 20:15
Snapper wrote:
> I'm not sure that I am understanding what the cylinder actually did. The
article
> said that the cy. shot up into the main cabin, hitting the door then falling
> down and exiting the hole in the fuselage.
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: Aug 28, 2008 20:20
Snapper wrote:
>
> I'm surprised that it was able to fall back through the hole that it made in the
> floor, unless it was an exceptionally large one.
Yes, it does seem a bit of a fluke, though at that point in time, there
would be significant airflow towards the hole.
Sylvia.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: PitsPits Date: Aug 28, 2008 21:12
> Snapper wrote:
>> I'm not sure that I am understanding what the cylinder actually did. The
> article
>> said that the cy. shot up into the main cabin, hitting the door then falling
>> down and exiting the hole in the fuselage.
Reading the report over lunch .
As said in first post on this incident .
They were/ are bloody lucky
Thankfully the what ever fates have a hand in such things in
addition to good hands and training
|
| Show full article (0.77Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: veritasveritas Date: Aug 28, 2008 22:04
Pits wrote:
>
> Reading the report over lunch .
> As said in first post on this incident .
>
> They were/ are bloody lucky
>
> Thankfully the what ever fates have a hand in such things in
> addition to good hands and training
>
> Still a lucky day
Yes Phil, indeed, it did end well. My next query is; what made the O2 bottle
fail? I anxiously await further investigator's reports.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: NedNed Date: Aug 29, 2008 02:39
veritas wrote:
> Pits wrote:
>>
>> Reading the report over lunch .
>> As said in first post on this incident .
>>
>> They were/ are bloody lucky
>>
>> Thankfully the what ever fates have a hand in such things in
>> addition to good hands and training
>>
>> Still a lucky day
>
>
> Yes Phil, indeed, it did end well. My next query is; what made the O2 bottle
fail?
It's OK - I think they're onto it.
> I anxiously await further investigator's reports.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: NedNed Date: Aug 29, 2008 04:59
Sylvia Else wrote:
> Snapper wrote:
>>
>> I'm surprised that it was able to fall back through the hole that it made in the
>> floor, unless it was an exceptionally large one.
>
> Yes, it does seem a bit of a fluke, though at that point in time, there would
be significant airflow towards the hole.
>
> Sylvia.
Nahh - was Harry Potter astride it - riding it out to freedom.
Doh!
Ned
PS You don't think gravity may have played a role?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: Aug 29, 2008 05:24
Ned wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
>> Snapper wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm surprised that it was able to fall back through the hole that it
> made in the
>>> floor, unless it was an exceptionally large one.
>>
>> Yes, it does seem a bit of a fluke, though at that point in time,
> there would be significant airflow towards the hole.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Nahh - was Harry Potter astride it - riding it out to freedom.
>
> Doh!
>
> Ned
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SnapperSnapper Date: Aug 29, 2008 16:51
Sylvia Else wrote...
> Yes, it does seem a bit of a fluke, though at that point in time, there
> would be significant airflow towards the hole.
Yeah, maybe.
Another thing, I read the article in the paper and viewed the photos online. The
hole in the floor seemed significant in size. The newspaper reports (which is
all we have to go on unless the man himself wishes to comment) suggest that the
crew wasn't aware of what damage had been caused til they landed. Now, I'm
wondering if they were able or unable to peer into the hole. If so would they
not have seen the opening in the fuselage?
To Marty, I saw a report on the news last night (Ten, it might've been) where
they had an animated "reproduction" of the events. According to it the base of
the cylinder ruptured. If that did happen then it's not surprising that it took
off like a bullet.
I once witnessed an oxy bottle (oxy acetylene type) fall off the back of a ute.
It hit the ground, the neck snapped off. It then shot down the hill like a
bullet and disappeared into the fog. We found it 100m away half buried.
Scary stuff.
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: Sylvia ElseSylvia Else Date: Aug 29, 2008 17:08
Snapper wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote...
>
>> Yes, it does seem a bit of a fluke, though at that point in time, there
>> would be significant airflow towards the hole.
>
> Yeah, maybe.
>
> Another thing, I read the article in the paper and viewed the photos online. The
> hole in the floor seemed significant in size. The newspaper reports (which is
> all we have to go on unless the man himself wishes to comment) suggest that the
> crew wasn't aware of what damage had been caused til they landed. Now, I'm
> wondering if they were able or unable to peer into the hole. If so would they
> not have seen the opening in the fuselage?
No - it was filled with baggage, remember?
Sylvia.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|