On Jul 9, 8:07Â pm, Stealth Pilot
aeroplanes.com.au>
wrote:> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:28:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>>OzOne wrote:
>>> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:53:05 +1000, Sylvia Else
>>> wrote:
>
>>>> Yes:
>
>
>>>> The sticking point is "with the intention of causing the other person to
>>>> fear physical or mental harm," even when allowing for subsection (3).
>
>>>> Sylvia.
>
>>> That would encompass moRon threatening to shoot Pesty and myself
>>> because he "had nothing to lose"
>>> Or going to great lengths to track down Pesty and have his mates
>>> threaten him.
>
>>> Or Peter numnuts Lucas threatening anyone who comes back at him after
>>> one of his outbursts
>
>>Perhaps, but note that the words "stalking" and "intimidation" have
>>specific meanings given in sections 7 and 8.
>
>>If Pesty has been tracked down to the extent that credible threats are
>>made against him or her, then of course the police should be informed.
>
>>But idle threats against pseudonyms posted to newsgroups wouldn't be
>>caught by the definition, I think.
>
>>Sylvia.
>
> sylvia
> nudism is healthy. dont worry about it.
> if you want a really good laugh just work up a mental picture of the
> sallow goon. that'll have you rolling.
>
> Stealth (we're all nude under the clothes) Pilot- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Healthy? I wouldnt have thought so , especially with the prevalence
of melanomas in this country, and I would guess the risk would be
higher with skin that only occaisionally sees the light of day. But
from a flying point of view their would be a distinct advantage on
those occaisions where you are pushing the weight and balance limits.
Much easier to shed the clothes than draining fuel out of the 152.
I think I have just got an idea for a fly in Stealth.
Terry
