> How do they do it? .......  Anti gravity??   ;-p
> Those clever Russians.
>
> http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=M-19zOPBDFc
>
> Graham

> On Aug 21, 9:06 am, "TacAN" wrote:

>> How do they do it? ....... Anti gravity?? ;-p
>> Those clever Russians.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=M-19zOPBDFc
>>
>> Graham

>
> Cameras never lie ?
> this one has me stumped unless the frame rate of the filming camera is
> synced to the main rotor RPM but it still looks wrong

> Pits wrote:

>> On Aug 21, 9:06 am, "TacAN" wrote:

>>> How do they do it? ....... Anti gravity?? ;-p
>>> Those clever Russians.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=M-19zOPBDFc
>>>
>>> Graham

>>
>> Cameras never lie ?
>> this one has me stumped unless the frame rate of the filming camera is
>> synced to the main rotor RPM but it still looks wrong

>
> It would need a very small exposure time to give such detail to the
> blades. I'm thinking some sort of fakery.
>
> Sylvia.

> "Sylvia Else" wrote in message
> news:g8igih$3a3$1@aioe.org...

>> Pits wrote:

>>> On Aug 21, 9:06 am, "TacAN" wrote:

>>>> How do they do it? ....... Anti gravity?? ;-p
>>>> Those clever Russians.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=M-19zOPBDFc
>>>>
>>>> Graham

>>> Cameras never lie ?
>>> this one has me stumped unless the frame rate of the filming camera is
>>> synced to the main rotor RPM but it still looks wrong

>> It would need a very small exposure time to give such detail to the
>> blades. I'm thinking some sort of fakery.
>>
>> Sylvia.

>
> you guys ......... :-) I don't even have to see the clip to know what your ...

> Atheist Chaplain wrote:

>> "Sylvia Else" wrote in message
>> news:g8igih$3a3$1@aioe.org...

>>> Pits wrote:

>>>> On Aug 21, 9:06 am, "TacAN" wrote:

>>>>> How do they do it? ....... Anti gravity?? ;-p
>>>>> Those clever Russians.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=M-19zOPBDFc
>>>>>
>>>>> Graham

>>>> Cameras never lie ?
>>>> this one has me stumped unless the frame rate of the filming camera is
>>>> synced to the main rotor RPM but it still looks wrong

>>> It would need a very small exposure time to give such detail to the
>>> blades. I'm thinking some sort of fakery.
>>>
>>> Sylvia. ...

>
> A friend worked for Chanel 7 for a few years, and he showed my how they
> reduce and even stop getting those lines you see running down computer
> monitors in the background of interviews by syncing the refresh of the
> camera with the sync of the monitor, same principal applies here :-)
> You could have fun at air shows with that trick :-)
> And it is far easier in the field as all it is is a little white knob that
> is turned until sync is achieved (and you can see the results in the
> eyepiece)

>
>
> Interesting technology - my last camera was an 8mm, so that's the
> extent of my exposure to cinematography :)

> veritas xxxxx.com> wrote in
> news:9629c$48ad5841$6192@news.teranews.com:
>

>>
>> Interesting technology - my last camera was an 8mm, so that's the
>> extent of my exposure to cinematography :)

>
> Super or Standard?

> Peter Fanelli wrote:

>> veritas xxxxx.com> wrote in
>> news:9629c$48ad5841$6192@news.teranews.com:

>>>
>>> Interesting technology - my last camera was an 8mm, so that's the
>>> extent of my exposure to cinematography :)

>>
>> Super or Standard?

>
>
> Shit no - just the standard......
> ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **