Author: Peelah Ben ArhnaPeelah Ben Arhna Date: Jun 22, 2007 07:45
I watched the last half of a show on Discovery (or one of them channels)
the other night. It was about that AA flight that experienced wake
turbulence on takeoff from a US airport. Apparently the tail snapped
off, allegedly due to severe rudder movements.
Now, when the A300 is in the ground the rudder pedal can be moved up to
4" to get full deflection either way. When in flight this is reduced to
an inch or so of pedal movement to get the same result.
Now, this has me confused. Given that at low speeds the rudder's
effectiveness is minimal, but at high speeds, ie, in flight, the rudder
can cause significant yaw for little movement. So, why would you want
greater sensitivity in the pedal controls?
Also, they interviewed a guy dressed in a captain's uniform. He said
that up until this incident no-one knew that full rudder deflection or
moevement could result in such a catastrophic failure.
The rest of the show was more or less Airbus attributing the crash to
pilot error, whereas the others said that Airbus withheld important data
that may have avoided the aircraft getting into trouble.
--
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
|