Re: 9/11 - Hundreds of firefighters, reporters, and paramedics reported multiple explosions at WTC - why Media ignoring them???????????????????????
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
aus.aviation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: 9/11 - Hundreds of firefighters, reporters, and paramedics reported multiple explosions at WTC - why Media ignoring them???????????????????????         

Group: aus.aviation · Group Profile
Author: agent86
Date: Mar 17, 2007 08:37

On 16 Mar 2007 15:20:26 -0700, 911falseflag@gmail.com wrote:


>>>How does one work? There a plenty of videos on the internet. You can
>>>see many controlled demolutions start with the sounds of explosions
>>>going off sometimes up to a minute before the global collapse. You
>>>could perform those preparatory explosions anytime you like before the
>>>global collapse staged. You could do them an hour before the
>>>collapse.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO.
>
>Why? You could.

And you could use Klingon disrupters to make the job much easier.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8BUoCIh-i4
>There in the Hotel San Diego demolition you hear explosions going off
>for ten seconds before you see any part of the building fall, before
>the global collapse is initiated.

Wow, 10 seconds. You've only got another 59 minutes and 50 seconds to
go.
>Here is another one with a dozen explosions heard before any collapse
>is seen:
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1Vu15D_0oI
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE0A9uvqg0Y&mode=related&search=
>Once again dozens of explosions heard before the building comes down.
>
>Actually, most controlled demolitions can seen to be preceded by a
>dozen or more explosions before any collapse initiation is seen.

But you don't have a clue as to what is going on inside the structure
during that delay time, do you?
>So why are you ROTFLMAO? Are you an ignorant fool?

That would be your department, Jake.
>>>Thats what we saw. Thats what we witnessed.
>>
>> You misspelled "imagine".
>
>Said the fool who can't focus on or discern the ratio discidendis.

Sort of fond of Latin, are we? Who are you trying to impress?


>> Haven't we been here before? It wasn't long ago that you promised to
>> stop posting. Yet here you are still at it.
>
>I waste my time arguing with idiots like you.

So why is that?


>>>? You're retarded? "things exploding" - but he doesn't know what it
>>>was because it could be a number of things.
>>
>> And still not a word about explosives.
>
>Whats your point?

That there were lots of loud noises associated with the collapse of
the building but none of them were caused by explosives.
>Why are you fixated on having an eyewitness account
>of an actual undetonated explosive device see in the builidng?

Sorry, Jake, I never said such a thing.


>> And neither do you. You just want so desperately to believe it to be
>> so. Even though there is not one shred of evidence to support it.
>
>Is that why I accepted the official story for four years until Jan
>2006 when I discovered this information, information that had been
>withheld from public circulation as well as information which had been
>withheld from mainstream media discussions such as the WTC7 footage?
>
>I had discovered all this information out there that had been
>deliberately kept from mainstream audiences and what do know that
>information happens to directly contradict the official story.

And much of what you "discovered" was never kept from the public,
Jake. And what you seem to think is so damning (the responder's
statements released in 2005) don't say anything like what you claim
that they say.
>>>You're insane Agen. You are truly insane and anyone reading this can
>>>identify your cognitive dissonance.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO. Especially coming from you.
>
>WHy would I have cognitive dissonance conflict about this story when I
>had accepted the official story for four years until I discovered this
>evidence that had been withheld from public circulation?

Your "new" evidence doesn't change anything about the events of that
day that has been reported ad nauseum since 9/11.


>> Why don't you ask the NYFD, Jake?
>
>There have been more recent interview, followups, and the same
>opinion. Many of the figher fighters think that 911 was an inside
>job.

Name one.
>But why we we go and collect their testimonies of the day of 9/11
>again when we already have them taken in Dec 2001? What credibility
>could be given to a testimony five years after the fact compared to
>one that was given a month after the attack?

You don't even understand my comment, do you? The City of New York
and the NYFD held those statements, Jake. Why don't you ask them why
they did that?
>We're talking about testimonies that were suppressed from public view
>Agen. You seem to avoid that.

No, Jake, I don't. Your "new" testimonies don't conflict with
material that was released soon after 9/11.
>WHy don't you tell us all why the testimonies were suppressed if their
>was nothing to hide?
>What were they hiding hey Agen?

Nothing.
>> But there were lots of "testimonies" from firemen available long
>> before these. Some as early as 2002.
>Yes and they are not exposing the explosions seen and heard to any
>extent that comes close to the daming evidence we find in the
>testimonies that were suppressed.

And neither do the "surpressed" statements, Jake. Except in your
vivid imagination.
>But I again I ask you Agen. Why were they suppressed?

They weren't.
> WHy did it take
>three years of litigation and a Court of Appeals to get these
>testimonies released to the public?

The stated reason is to protect the privacy of those involved. I
suspect the real reason is that the statements reveal how totally
unprepared the government of New York City was for an event like 9/11,
and how deficient the systems of the various emergency departments
were.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/nyctap/I05_0034.htm

"The Fire Department contends that the privacy exception applies to
the portions of the 911 calls that are in dispute; that the
intra-agency exception applies to the disputed portions of the
dispatch calls; and that both these exceptions apply to portions of
the oral histories. The Department also contends that the law
enforcement exception applies to the six potential exhibits at the
Moussaoui trial, but it does not identify those six exhibits or say
which categories they belong to. Thus, we first consider the
application of the privacy and intra-agency exceptions to each
category of materials, and then discuss the law enforcement exception.
A. The 911 Calls The Fire Department does not now oppose disclosure of
the words spoken in the 911 calls by 911 operators, or by the eight
men whose families are seeking disclosure. Thus, the only issue before
us is whether the disclosure of words spoken by other callers would
constitute an "unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.""
> if it wasn't these damningly
>conclusive testimonies of explosions and controlled demolition having
>been witnessed then what was it?

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/13/nyregion/nyregionspecial3/13records.html?ex=1174190400&en...

"The oral histories were gathered in 2001 on the instructions of
Thomas Von Essen, who was fire commissioner on Sept. 11."

If there was something to hide, Jake, why did the Fire Commissioner
even have them recorded?
>>>And you have the audicity to call Griffin a lier and yet he has his
>>>citations below, you can go check the full testimomnies yourself as
>>>you should if you want to varify everything in the article cited.
>>>
>>>What the fuck is wrong with you man? Are you brainwashed stupid?
>>
>> Pot, Kettle, Black, Jake.
>
>No I'm not brainwashed AGen.

Could have fooled most of the readers here, Jake.


>>>>>You're unbelievable man. These low level flashes arn't even happening
>>>>>at the collapse point - they are going off way below!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> And he never claims that it was explosives, Jake.
>>>
>>>just like above where he says "things exploding" and you claim that he
>>>never claims there were explosions.
>>
>> I've never made such a claim, Jake. There were lots of things banging
>> around that sounded like explosions. There may have even been things
>> exploding like transformers in the the building. There just weren't
>> any explosives.
>
>You have no evidence that it was transformers exploding.

You have no evidence that it wasn't. You have no evidence of
anything.
>Which part of that don't you get? Care to explain to everyone why the
>testimonies were suppressed?

They weren't suppressed. Again, I'll ask you. If there was something
to hide, why did the NY Fire Commissioner even have them recorded?
>>>You're a real english comprehesnive genious.
>>
>> Obviously, I'm a lot better than you. BTW, it's "comprehensive" and
>> "genius".
>
>yes they are called careless typos. Notice how you fixate on
>irrelevant points.

If you're going to throw stones, Jake, don't live in a glass house.
>>>You're beyond idiot.
>>
>> That's a real hoot, coming from you.
>>
>>>>>>You know like when they
>>>>>> demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls
>>>>>> down? That's what I thought I saw.
>>>>
>>>>>Yes Agen? What was your point?
>>>>
>>>> He never claims that it was explosives. In fact he says:
>>>>
>>>> "I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the
>>>> building cowing down and pushing things down, it could have been
>>>> electrical explosions, it could have been whatever. "
>>>>
>>>> But not explosives.
>
>He doesn't say "But not explosives". He says there were explosions and
>that he doesn't know what it was. He says it could have been
>"whatever".

But he doesn't say that they were caused by explosives, Jake. In
fact, he says that he equates it to the "building coming down and
pushing things down" or to "electrical explosions".
>Besides, there other the other testimonies to varify the uncertain
>semantics which you fixate on to the point of getting out a dictionary
>to argue about the meaning of "seemed" even though you have no idea
>what the meaning of "seemed" is by the person who used it thus
>demonstrating your inability to extract the ratio discidendi of
>matters.

"seemed" means what it means, Jake. At least to normal people. People
like you do like to make up your own definitions for words sometimes.
>How about this one to corroborate the above:

It doesn't.
>"how could this be happening so quickly if a plane hit way above?"
>After he reached the 24th floor, he and another fireman "heard this
>huge explosion that sounded like a bomb [and] knocked off the lights
>and stalled the elevator."

Which was the fall of the south tower.
>After they pried themselves out of the
>elevator, "another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one
>hits about two minutes later . . . [and] I'm thinking, 'Oh. My God,
>these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993!'"1
>Firefighter Louie Cacchioli

Ah, yes, good old Lou. You do realize that this statement isn't from
your "suppressed" testimonies, don't you, Jake?

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=57424&page=8

"Originally, on September 12, 2001, People Magazine ran a few short
paragraphs about the 20-year veteran New York fireman hearing what
sounded like bombs exploding in the north tower.

Short and sweet, that was it. A few short words about bombs exploding,
but words that were repeated over and over again in story after story
by writers and broadcasters who never even bothered to talk to him in
the first place.

Furthermore, Cacchioli was upset that People Magazine misquoted him,
saying "there were bombs" in the building when all he said was he
heard "what sounded like bombs" without having definitive proof bombs
were actually detonated."

http://www.911myths.com/html/quote_abuse.html

"...I asked the senior man working to take the elevator.

He entered the elevator with the last company that went up. They went
up to the 24th floor or the 22nd floor and the company was getting
off. I think it was the truck company at that time, because he grabbed
the last guy getting out, who was the irons man and he said "You gotta
stay with me, because I need tools in the elevator."

At that time, the doors closed and that's when the power went out.
Which, what we found out later was when the south tower fell down.
They were able to force their way out of the elevator and for some
reason the guy from the truck, from 13 truck, went to the right and he
went to the left and found a stairwell and he was able to make it out.

Q. Who is "he"?

A. Louie Cacchioli."
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110285....
>Why wouldn't a fire fighter know that transformers were most likely
>the reason for these explosions that sounded like bombs?

It's sort of difficult to tell one loud noise from another.
>There goes you "transformer" theory eh!!!!!!

It wasn't my "transformer theory", Jake. And what Lou Cacchioli heard
was the collapse of the south tower.
>[Multiple explosions were also reported by Teresa Veliz, who worked
>for a software development company in the north tower. She was on the
>47th floor, she reported, when suddenly "the whole building
>shook. . . . [Shortly thereafter] the building shook again, this time
>even more violently." Then, while Veliz was making her way downstairs
>and outside: "There were explosions going off everywhere. I was
>convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone
>was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons. . . . There
>was another explosion. And another. I didn't know where to run."13]

Strange that she tells a somewhat different story here:

http://www.amazon.com/September-11-History-Dean-Murphy/dp/product-description/03...

Teresa Veliz

A Prayer to Die Quickly and Painlessly

Teresa Veliz was the facilities manager for Clearforest, a software
development company that had offices on the 47th floor of the North
Tower. Because she had two narrow escapes on September 11--one on an
elevator and one on an escalator--she worries that she cheated death.
She has been unable to return to work, and only conquered her frequent
anxiety attacks by going back to Lower Manhattan and retracing her
steps of that morning. There with her mother at her side, she cried
until she could cry no more. "I won't lie to you," she says. "That day
turned my life upside down."

I can still hear that horrible noise in my ears. "Bang! Bang! Bang!
Bang! Bang! Bang!" It was the sound of my elevator hitting the walls
as it dropped from just above the 47th floor. The further down it
fell, the fainter the bangs became--and the more terrified I felt. I
had just stepped off that elevator, maybe nine or ten seconds earlier,
leaving a handful of people continuing up to higher floors. I got off,
turned the corner and opened the door to the ladies' room. I said good
morning to a lady sitting at the mirror when the whole building shook.
I thought it was an earthquake. Then I heard those banging noises on
the other side of the wall. It sounded like someone had cut the
elevator cables. It just fell and fell and fell.

I began to cry. "Oh, my God, I just got off that elevator!" I said.
"That could have been me." I prayed that those other people had gotten
off on the 48th floor before the elevator dropped. But I didn't have
much time to be upset because the building shook again, this time even
more violently. The lady at the mirror grabbed me from behind and held
on for dear life. She was sobbing and screaming. I didn't even know
her name. She worked for a bank on the same floor. We would pass from
time to time in the hallway or in the ladies' room and exchange
pleasantries. But I was all she had right then. I had to be strong for
her.

"We have to leave," I told her.

"No! No! We can't go out there," she screamed.

"I have to go and see who is in my office," I said. "But I'll take you
to your office first. I promise I won't leave you alone. Don't worry,
everything's going to be all right."

I dropped my things on the bench in the bathroom--my handbag and the
morning supply of bagels and muffins. I opened the door and there was
a puff of dust so I turned back and got some tissue to cover our
noses. I then walked the lady down the hall toward her office, my mind
in rapid-replay mode. I was retracing my steps, the ones that got me
off the elevator with only a few seconds to spare. I had stopped at
Bon Ami to get the muffins. I remember the line was long. I was very
impatient. I never had to wait so long before and I wanted to be at
work on time. Then I went to American Cafe for the kosher bagels. Some
people in my office only eat kosher. I had to wait there too. Finally,
I waved some money in the air and slapped it down on the counter. "I
can't wait," I announced and I rushed out the door with the bagels.
When I entered the lobby of 1 World Trade Center, I pulled out my ID
and swiped it through the security reader. I could see the elevator
was there, the doors still open. Oh, great, I thought. The elevator is
going to leave without me. But for whatever reason, it didn't. I ran
and got in. It wasn't crowded. "Today is my lucky day after all," I
thought as the doors closed and we headed up directly to the 44th
floor, where I switched to a waiting local elevator for the final
three stories up.

I felt okay leaving the lady at the bank. There were about 50 or so
people there, so she had plenty of company and would be taken care of.
I didn't worry much more about her. But I was worried about my own
office colleagues. I felt it was one of my responsibilities, making
sure everybody was okay. It came with the job title. I was chief
caretaker, ordering supplies, buying breakfast--and taking control in
an emergency. I am strong when I have to be for other people. It
wouldn't be until much later in the morning that I let down and
allowed myself to feel all the pain and anxiety that was rushing
through my own mind and body.

"Katherine! Katherine!" I began screaming as I opened the door to my
company's offices. But Katherine, I later learned, was still in the
lobby waiting for an elevator when the plane hit. She had turned
around and left the building safely.

Then I heard the voice of another colleague, Karin. "No, T, it is only
me," she said, using my nickname. It was still before nine, it was
Election Day and quite a few people had morning meetings away from the
office, so Karin was alone, except for an electrician who had been
working in the hallway. She was so scared that she was hiding under a
table. "What do we do?" she asked.

"We evacuate," I said.

I told Karin to gather up her things, that I would be back in a
minute. I had to run back to the ladies' room and get my purse. I
didn't want to leave without my ID. The electrician tried to talk me
out of it, saying it was dangerous to go back there. But I felt okay
about it because I had just been there. When I got back from the
ladies' room, Karin was in her office talking to her mother on the
telephone. Her back was to the window. I was looking at her when
something fell behind her outside. Was it a body? A piece of the
building? The airplane? I wasn't sure, but I knew things shouldn't be
falling like that. "Please hurry up!" I said to Karin, not saying
anything about the object outside. I knew that would have sent her
into a panic.

I quickly looked around the office for anything we might need to take
if this turned out to be a big fire. My CD player was on my desk with
my collection of CDs. Guns N' Roses. George Michael. A bunch of movie
soundtracks. They can be replaced, I thought. Then I saw a laptop. It
belonged to the director of finance who was visiting from Israel. I
knew it had all of the company's important financial information. I
stood there and spoke to it. "I hope you will be here tomorrow," I
told it. "I can't take you. I can't be weighed down. I am sorry." We
closed all of the doors to the inside offices, put some paper towels
over our noses and hurried out.

We took staircase B. It was slow moving but orderly. Clearly, my
survival instinct kicked in. I was as cool as a cucumber. I also had a
bit of mother hen in me. I was very protective of Karin. We are about
the same age, early thirties, and about the same height, but I am
heavier and stronger. She wears a size 2, I wear a 14. And I tend to
take charge in situations like this. At one point, when the flow of
injured people in the staircase started to get to Karin, I shielded
her. "It's okay, Karin," I said. "Just turn your head." We saw the
lady from the bathroom upstairs. She was having a bad panic attack.
She was crying hysterically. One of the emergency workers was
escorting her down the left side of the stairs, which was reserved as
a passing lane for the injured. We also stepped to the right when a
blind man and his dog wanted to get by.

As I looked up behind me and down ahead of me, I heard people getting
upset about the slow pace. "Why are we stopping?" they were saying. I
said to myself, It's okay. Let them speak. So long as no one reacts
and pushes their way down. At some of the slowest moments, I got
impatient too, even looking enviously at the injured people who had
priority to go ahead of us. Sometimes it would be like an ambulance
racing down a busy street, when some cars pull behind it and take
advantage of the open road. Only this time the cars were anxious
people in the line. I told Karin not to worry, that I would get her
out one way or the other. I would fight for us if I had to. I began
devising a plan in my head. Karin would have a heart condition. She
would pass out. I would tell everyone that we had to get by. But by
the 18th floor, a fireman announced that it was clear sailing the rest
of the way. No more stopping. And he was right. The pace picked up
considerably and I never had to resort to the theatrics. I said
thank-you to that fireman. I don't know if he heard me, but I was glad
I said it.

At one point, we had to move to the right to let one of the many burn
victims pass. She didn't know it, but this woman was an incredible
source of strength for me. Her back was badly burnt, and so were her
face, neck and ears. But she wasn't crying or screaming in pain. She
might have been in shock, but even so, she walked with an amazing
sense of dignity. Her chin was up, her shoulders back and eyes
straight ahead. Don't lose it, T. Don't lose it, T, I said in a pep
talk to myself after she went by. Later, I worried that I had let down
a fireman, but it seems he gave me an impossible assignment. He had
opened the door, I think it was at the 33rd floor, and looked right at
me. "You," he said. "Tell No. 5 that the doorman is here." Smoke was
coming off the floor into the stairwell and someone yelled, "Close the
door!" The fireman was gone. Everyone around me started to repeat the
instructions, like schoolchildren trying to memorize the words to a
song. "Tell No. 5 that the doorman is here. Tell No. 5 that the
doorman is here. Tell No. 5 that the doorman is here." But there was
no No. 5. I carefully noted the numbers on the helmets of the guys
coming up. Some had no numbers, at least not ones that I could see.
The firemen with numbers were 23, 39 and 6. So the message never got
relayed. I hope it wasn't important.

We finally reached the bottom, dumping out on to the concourse level.
The sprinklers were on, so it had gotten pretty ..."

You'll have to buy the book to find the ending....
>[Steve Evans, a New York-based correspondent for the BBC, said: "I was
>at the base of the second tower . . . that was hit. . . . There was an
>explosion. . . . The base of the building shook. . . . [T]hen there
>was a series of explosions."14]
>Hey Agen, but guess what - He didn't say "explosives" did he!!!! Hey
>mate. Hey. You thinking that too. THis is evidence man. This is
>probably just transformers blowing up.
>
>Was their a reevaluation of recalling all transformers of this kind
>after 9/11? They sound pretty dangerous mate!!!

You do get stuck on things, don't you, Jake?
>[Sue Keane, an officer in the New Jersey Fire Police Department who
>was previously a sergeant in the U.S. Army, said in her account of the
>onset of the collapse of the south tower: "[I]t sounded like bombs
>going off. That's when the explosions happened. . . . I knew something
>was going to happen. . . . It started to get dark, then all of a
>sudden there was this massive explosion." Then, discussing her
>experiences during the collapse of the north tower, she said: "[There
>was] another explosion. That sent me and the two firefighters down the
>stairs. . . . I can't tell you how many times I got banged around.
>Each one of those explosions picked me up and threw me. . . . There
>was another explosion, and I got thrown with two firefighters out onto
>the street."15]
>
>
>Wow Agen, Geeeez, you've successful debunk one testimony by looking up
>"seemed" in the dictionary and disputing its meaning and accusing me
>of having english comprehension problems.
>
>Can't wait to see you dispute Sue Keane's testimony!!!!

What is there to dispute, Jake? She heard the sounds of two massive
buildings collapsing.
>[Wall Street Journal reporter John Bussey, describing his observation
>of the collapse of the south tower from the ninth floor of the WSJ
>office building, said: "I . . . looked up out of the office window to
>see what seemed like perfectly synchronized explosions coming from
>each floor. . . . One after the other, from top to bottom, with a
>fraction of a second between, the floors blew to pieces."16 ]
>
>Wow Agen, he could see the floors actually blowing to pieces in what
>"""seemed""" like perfectly synchornised EXPLOSIONS coming from each
>floor. THE FLOORS BLEW TO PIECES!!!

They tend to do that when hit by millions of tons of building comes
crashing down from above.
>[Another Wall Street Journal reporter said that after seeing what
>appeared to be "individual floors, one after the other exploding
>outward," he thought: "'My God, they're going to bring the building
>down.' And they, whoever they are, HAD SET CHARGES. . . . I saw the
>explosions."17]

And again, the outer walls would tend to "explode" outward when
stressed by the collapse of the millions of pounds of building that
was coming down on them.
>WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AGEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He said "SET
>CHARGES" he said he thought "oh my god they are going to bring the
>building down"
>
>Who's "they" Agen????? Osama????????????????????????

"They" is no one, Jake, in this case. The gentleman is mistaken in
his analysis of what he saw. Neither he, nor you, has any evidence to
back up his interpretation of the events.
>[A similar perception was reported by Beth Fertig of WNYC Radio, who
>said: "It just descended like a timed explosion-like when they are
>deliberately bringing a building down. . . . It was coming down so
>perfectly that in one part of my brain I was thinking, 'They got
>everyone out, and they're bringing the building down because they have
>to.'"18]

Do you understand what the word "like" means, Jake?
>Geee AGen. Hundreds of such testimonies mate.

None of which mean what you imagine that they do.
>[Firefighter Timothy Julian said: "First I thought it was an
>explosion. I thought maybe there was a bomb on the plane, but delayed
>type of thing, you know secondary device. . . . I just heard like an
>explosion and then a cracking type of noise, and then it sounded like
>a freight train, rumbling and picking up speed, and I remember I
>looked up, and I saw it coming down."21]

He heard the sounds of a very large building collapsing.
>Basically Agen everyone testifies to hearing and seeing this. You
>cannot deny it.

I don't deny what they say, Jake. It just doesn't mean what you want
it to mean.
>Deny this testimony too?
>
>[Emergency medical technician Michael Ober said: "[W]e heard a rumble,
>some twisting metal, we looked up in the air, and . . . it looked to
>me just like an explosion. It didn't look like the building was coming
>down, it looked like just one floor had blown completely outside of
>it. . . . I didn't think they were coming down. I just froze and stood
>there looking at it."22 Ober's testimony suggests that he heard and
>saw the explosion before he saw any sign that the building was coming
>down.]

Actually it doesn't.

Mr. Ober also said this:

"As we were walking into the building, we just heard a huge bang."

And what was it that he heard? He continues:

"As we looked up, it was someone who had jumped,
god knows how far up."

But let's go back to what he really said:

"Then we heard a rumble, some twisting metal, we looked up in the air,
and to be totally honest, at first, I donÂ’t know exactlyÂ…but it looked
to me just like an explosion. It didnÂ’t look like the building was
coming down, it looked like just one floor had blown completely
outside of it. I was sitting there looking at it. I just never thought
they would ever come down, so I didnÂ’t think they were coming down. I
just froze and stood there looking at it."

No evidence of an explosion there at all.
>Wow Agen, you'd have everyone on the floor laughing at you by now!!!!!

That's your department, Jake.
>All of this I'm taking from the same article
>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12564.htm

Which means nothing, Jake. Unless one takes everything that Griffin
says as gospel like you do.
>You of course were meant to have read it? You claim to have read it
>and yet you are holding this position?

Because its reality, Jake.
>You seen any mental health professionals lately? I think you better!

Have you seen your psychiatrist yet, Jake?
>[This point is made even more clearly by Chief Frank Cruthers, who
>said: "There was what appeared to be at first an explosion. It
>appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides,
>materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a
>momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the
>collapse."23]

"appeared to be at first", Jake. Not "was". It wsa the collapse of
the building that he was describing.


>Do your parents know that you are trolling usenet with your silly
>little ideas?

You're the one with the silly ideas, Jake.
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!