On Aug 15, 5:36 am, GB
kickindanuts.threefiddy.com> wrote:>> On Aug 14, 5:03 pm, Snapper
y7mail.com.invalid> wrote:>>> Even if the pilot gets off, do you think that any airline in its
>>> right mi nd is gonna hire the guy?
>> That is NOT the issue being discussed here
>
> Pits, it absolutely IS the issue being discussed (well, one of
> them anyway), since Snapper brought it up.
>
>> Snapper were you or are you a pilot ?
>
> This is becoming a bit of a trend lately Phil, and I don't
> much like it. You've done it to me this week, you're doing it
> to Snapper now,
GB with respect you have read far too much into the questions .
Re were or are you a pilot comes from the spirit of
I have much data and a few on here receive stuff from me
that I prefer NOT to post to an open forum.
Some of it is in pilot idiom/jargon/techo crap or even simple
photos .
Unless you have done the walk arounds BGT etc some folks may not
know what they are looking at
in precise detail . .
So has NOTHING at all with a club type mind set.
> and to John in your next post.
Crap Not at all John is or was a rotary wing type bloke ( and good
set of hands also )
Question was based on a post of johns some time back that he may be
pulling the pin
and again nothing to do with any club type mind set .
Please do not be too precious or thin skinned as there is (in here
rarely any malice to any one)
In your case certainly no malice (although if you wish I may be able
to purchase some) :) and send your way
> Membership of
> a club (or your explicit approval) are not and have never been
> pre-requisites for posting to aus.aviation or any other usenet
> group.
Give me a break -- you should know better than that .
Although some usenet groups I find some posters separated from
reality
However we are all victims of our own reality , are we not :)
>It's a walk-up start, usenet takes all comers. If you
> want a private members-only club, go to pprune.
EEK !!! Not as long as my bum points to the ground.
Here is MUCH MUCH better as our little exchange shows
> I choose to
> enjoy the polyphany of voices that is aus.aviation - professionals
> alongside amateurs, experienced alongside wannabe, rational
> alongside raving (hello Stealth!) lunatics - so I choose to
> stay right here. I also choose to 'defend to the death'
> everyone's right to say their piece. The apparently increasing
> frequency with which someone needs to remind you to pull your
> head in is a bit worrying though.
But always there I am sure and believe it or not always appreciated
and usually taken on board.
Depending on from whom the advice comes .
You even left out the eccentric but consistent pretzle
>
>> That came out far harsher than meant.
>
> So why the hell did you publish it?
Because I type as I speak .
>> But unless you have sweat bllod it is VERY hard to explain what the
>> issues are here .
>
> Notwithstanding that one of the issues here is the bloke's
> future employment prospects. It's an issue because Snapper
> MADE it an issue (as he is entitled to do).
>
> GB
Jesus ! I wont go there on here .
But more than happy to debate certain aspects of that contention with
you off ng
Oh and you did not answer my question to you.
I could take the line that an answer is required because I made it an
issue
But my good manners and breeding preclude that i do not :-)
Take care you precious old tart :-) have a boags
