http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/ Posts for at.gesellschaft.politik Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:14:11 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/ http://www.nnseek.com/img/64.png 64 64 NNSeek http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/obama_barack_bin_laden_in_einer_lose_lose_situation_339456172t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/obama_barack_bin_laden_in_einer_lose_lose_situation_339456172t.html Obama website riles Muslims

Some American-Muslim leaders say Barack Obama's website aimed at countering
rumors that he is a Muslim -- fightthesmears.com -- sends a negative message
about their religion.

Vanessa Alikhan was at a Democratic ''unity party'' when she overheard
another guest indignantly refute the rumor that Barack Obama is Muslim, as
if it were a racial slur. She later recounted the conversation to a friend.

''She told me that this is politics and that I should just deal with it,''
said Alikhan, a Fort Lauderdale graphic artist who converted to Islam about
five years ago. ``To me this is the same as telling an African American or a
Jewish person they should deal with discrimination because people aren't
ready to embrace them as a group.''

She and other American Muslims are speaking out, as the Obama campaign
pushes back on widely e-mailed and patently false claims that he is tied to
Islamic terrorists. The rumor could be particularly damaging in a must-win
state like Florida, which has a large Jewish population.

Determined not to be ''swift-boated'' the way 2004 nominee John Kerry was
buried by attacks on his military record, the Obama campaign has set up the
website www.fightthesmears.com. While Muslim leaders understand the
campaign's responsibility to counter misinformation, they say the
classification of being Muslim as a ''smear'' goes too far.

Their outrage peaked when the Obama campaign asked two women wearing head
scarves to move away from the candidate -- and the television cameras -- at
a rally last month in Detroit. Obama personally apologized to the women, but
the incident reflected the difficulties of balancing hard-nosed political
calculations with the campaign's overall message of change and unity.

''The truth is Obama has both set the record straight about his religious
upbringing, background and faith -- and spoken out against efforts to
marginalize Muslims,'' said Obama campaign spokesman Josh Earnest.

`I'M NOT A MUSLIM'

He pointed to Obama's interview with CBS' 60 Minutes, in which he said, ``I
have never been a Muslim. I'm not a Muslim. These e-mails are obviously not
just offensive to me, somebody who is a devout Christian, who's been going
to the same church for the last 20 years, but it's also offensive to
Muslims, because it plays into, obviously, a certain fear-mongering there.''

But some Muslim leaders said Obama needs to do more to make it clear that he
welcomes their support in his campaign. Though he's spoken at many churches
and synagogues -- including a conservative congregation in Boca Raton -- he
has never visited a mosque, said Altaf Ali, executive director of the South
Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. There are
between 200,000 and 400,000 Muslims in Florida and about seven million
nationwide.

The Muslim community saw little outreach from presidential candidates until
2000, when Republican George Bush successfully enlisted Muslim donors and
included mosques in his proposal for government partnering with religious
institutions. But since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, many American
Muslims say they are treated with suspicion.

''Since 9/11, our community has been portrayed as inherently evil, and what
Obama is doing is adding to the negative stereotype,'' Ali said. ``His
message is about change, and he has to appeal to every minority group.''

That's a tall order for the first African-American presidential nominee as
he tries to broaden his appeal for the general election. Ali said that
Obama, who spent part of his childhood in Indonesia, the largest Muslim
country in the world, is uniquely suited ``to be a bridge between America
and the Muslim world.''

Saif Ishoof, president of the Center for Voter Advocacy, a nonpartisan group
that educates Muslims about the political process, said Republican John
McCain also needs to show more sensitivity.

Ishoof, a lifelong Republican, said he bristles when McCain consistently
refers to ``Islamic terrorists.''

''By using that phraseology, he is giving credence to a world view that 99
percent of Muslims do not consider their own,'' said Ishoof, an attorney who
runs a Miami engineering firm.

Though the Muslim community pales in comparison to other religious voting
blocs in Florida, Ishoof noted that it is concentrated in central Florida,
the battleground region of the state.

CRITICAL VOTE

Muslim voters could make the difference in several states crucial to winning
the White House, including Michigan, Ohio and Virginia.

''Every vote is going to be critical,'' Ishoof said.

Alikhan said she will continue to volunteer for the Obama campaign but vowed
that she will also try to educate voters about Islam. She described her
recent experience with anti-Muslim bias in an e-mail to about 1,500 friends
and Democratic activists.

The e-mail began ''Hello and Salaams'' and ended with, ``The photos are of
me and my husband so that you can see what a Muslim American looks like.''

They are an attractive, well-dressed couple in their 30s who look like they
belong in a South Beach club -- except that they heed their religion's
prohibition on drinking.

''I am an American, and I felt all of the pain that Americans felt for the
9/11 victims,'' Alikhan said. ``Yet I've had fingers pointed at me and been
asked the most ridiculous questions you can imagine. . . . I'm not asking
Obama to go to a mosque or call me on the phone, but I'd like to see him
show some more sensitivity.''


http://www.miamiherald.com/news/florida/story/595064.html



--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

no comments

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:14:11 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/italien_mailand_schliesst_moschee_339358636t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/italien_mailand_schliesst_moschee_339358636t.html http://www.pi-news.net/2008/07/mailaender-moschee-wird-geschlossen/

Siehe auch dieses foto der gl

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:29:27 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/england_sniffer_dogs_to_wear_muslim_bootees_339337388t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/england_sniffer_dogs_to_wear_muslim_bootees_339337388t.html
Faith Central: Police puppy considered "ritually" unclean

Police sniffer dogs will have to wear bootees when searching the homes of
Muslims so as not to cause offence.

Guidelines being drawn up by the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo)
urge awareness of religious sensitivities when using dogs to search for
drugs and explosives. The guidelines, to be published this year, were
designed to cover mosques but have been extended to include other buildings.

Where Muslims object, officers will be obliged to use sniffer dogs only in
exceptional cases. Where dogs are used, they will have to wear bootees with
rubber soles. "We are trying to ensure that police forces are aware of
sensitivities that people can have with the dogs to make sure they are not
going against any religious or cultural element within people's homes. It is
being addressed and forces are working towards doing it," Acpo said.

Problems faced by the use of sniffer dogs were highlighted last week when
Tayside police were forced to apologise for a crime prevention poster
featuring a german shepherd puppy, in response to a complaint by a Muslim
councillor.

Islamic injunctions warn Muslims against contact with dogs, which are
regarded as "unclean".

Police dogs at present are issued with footwear only at scenes of explosions
to prevent them injuring their paws on broken glass.

Ibrahim Mogra, one of Britain's leading imams, said the measures were
unnecessary: "In Islamic law the dog is not regarded as impure, only its
saliva is. Most Islamic schools of law agree on that. If security measures
require to send a dog into a house, then it has to be done. I think Acpo
needs to consult better and more widely.

"I know in the Muslim community there is a hang-up against dogs, but this is
cultural. Also, we know the British like dogs; we Muslims should do our bit
to change our attitudes."

John Midgley, co-founder of the Campaign Against Political Correctness,
said: "The police are in effect being overly sensitive to potential
criminals and not being sensitive enough to the public at large who need to
be protected. These sort of things have a counter-productive effect because
they cause huge friction between different communities."

Caroline Kisko, of the Kennel Club, said: "We would not condone any attempt
to make search dogs wear special clothing, which could cause them distress."


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4276489.ece



--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:04:22 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/ibn_warraq_why_the_west_is_best_my_response_to_tariq_339242924t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/ibn_warraq_why_the_west_is_best_my_response_to_tariq_339242924t.html Last October, I participated in a debate in London, hosted by Intelligence
Squared, to consider the motion, "We should not be reluctant to assert the
superiority of Western values." Muslim intellectual Tariq Ramadan, among
others, spoke against the motion; I spoke in favor, focusing on the vast
disparities in freedom, human rights, and tolerance between Western and
Islamic societies. Here, condensed somewhat, is the case that I made.

The great ideas of the West-rationalism, self-criticism, the disinterested
search for truth, the separation of church and state, the rule of law and
equality under the law, freedom of thought and expression, human rights, and
liberal democracy-are superior to any others devised by humankind. It was
the West that took steps to abolish slavery; the calls for abolition did not
resonate even in Africa, where rival tribes sold black prisoners into
slavery. The West has secured freedoms for women and racial and other
minorities to an extent unimaginable 60 years ago. The West recognizes and
defends the rights of the individual: we are free to think what we want, to
read what we want, to practice our religion, to live lives of our choosing.

In short, the glory of the West, as philosopher Roger Scruton puts it, is
that life here is an open book. Under Islam, the book is closed. In many
non-Western countries, especially Islamic ones, citizens are not free to
read what they wish. In Saudi Arabia, Muslims are not free to convert to
Christianity, and Christians are not free to practice their faith-clear
violations of Article 18 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of
Human Rights. In contrast with the mind-numbing enforced certainties and
rules of Islam, Western civilization offers what Bertrand Russell once
called "liberating doubt," which encourages the methodological principle of
scientific skepticism. Western politics, like science, proceeds through
tentative steps of trial and error, open discussion, criticism, and
self-correction.

One could characterize the difference between the West and the Rest as a
difference in epistemological principles. The desire for knowledge, no
matter where it leads, inherited from the Greeks, has led to an institution
unequaled-or very rarely equaled-outside the West: the university. Along
with research institutes and libraries, universities are, at least ideally,
independent academies that enshrine these epistemological norms, where we
can pursue truth in a spirit of disinterested inquiry, free from political
pressures. In other words, behind the success of modern Western societies,
with their science and technology and open institutions, lies a distinct way
of looking at the world, interpreting it, and recognizing and rectifying
problems.

The edifice of modern science and scientific method is one of Western man's
greatest gifts to the world. The West has given us not only nearly every
scientific discovery of the last 500 years-from electricity to computers-but
also, thanks to its humanitarian impulses, the Red Cross, Doctors Without
Borders, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International. The West provides
the bulk of aid to beleaguered Darfur; Islamic countries are conspicuous by
their lack of assistance.

Moreover, other parts of the world recognize Western superiority. When other
societies such as South Korea and Japan have adopted Western political
principles, their citizens have flourished. It is to the West, not to Saudi
Arabia or Iran, that millions of refugees from theocratic or other
totalitarian regimes flee, seeking tolerance and political freedom. Nor
would any Western politician be able to get away with the anti-Semitic
remarks that former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad made in 2003.
Our excusing Mahathir's diatribe indicates not only a double standard but
also a tacit acknowledgment that we apply higher ethical standards to
Western leaders.

A culture that gave the world the novel; the music of Mozart, Beethoven, and
Schubert; and the paintings of Michelangelo, da Vinci, and Rembrandt does
not need lessons from societies whose idea of heaven, peopled with female
virgins, resembles a cosmic brothel. Nor does the West need lectures on the
superior virtue of societies in which women are kept in subjection under
sharia, endure genital mutilation, are stoned to death for alleged adultery,
and are married off against their will at the age of nine; societies that
deny the rights of supposedly lower castes; societies that execute
homosexuals and apostates. The West has no use for sanctimonious homilies
from societies that cannot provide clean drinking water or sewage systems,
that make no provisions for the handicapped, and that leave 40 to 50 percent
of their citizens illiterate.

As Ayatollah Khomeini once famously said, there are no jokes in Islam. The
West is able to look at its foibles and laugh, to make fun of its
fundamental principles: but there is no equivalent as yet to Monty Python's
Life of Brian in Islam. Can we look forward, someday, to a Life of Mo?
Probably not-one more small sign that Western values remain the best, and
perhaps the only, means for all people, no matter of what race or creed, to
reach their full potential and live in freedom.

http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_snd-west.html



--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:10:11 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/england_moon_mistaken_for_ufo_339232428t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/england_moon_mistaken_for_ufo_339232428t.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/2248463/Moon-mistaken-for...

Ausschnitt:

Today officers released a transcript in order to highlight the time wasted
by unnecessary 999 calls.

The bizzare conversation ran as follows:

Control: "South Wales Police, what's your emergency?"

Caller: "It's not really. I just need to inform you that across the mountain
there's a bright stationary object."

Control: "Right."

Caller: "If you've got a couple of minutes perhaps you could find out what
it is? It's been there at least half an hour and it's still there."

Control: "It's been there for half an hour. Right. Is it actually on the
mountain or in the sky?"

Caller: "It's in the air."

Control: "I will send someone up there now to check it out."

Caller: "OK."

After the police patrol car arrives, the script reveals the exchange between
the control room and the police officer sent to the scene.

Control: "Alpha Zulu 20, this object in the sky, did anyone have a look at
it?"

Officer: "Yes, it's the moon. Over."




--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

no comments

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:38:18 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/der_islam_ist_kein_neues_problem_primer_on_islamic_339228332t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/der_islam_ist_kein_neues_problem_primer_on_islamic_339228332t.html
One of the alleged sins held against the West by Islamic radicalism - which
has declared war on us through Osama bin Laden's fatwa issued in 1998 in
London - is imperialism: the imperialism of the Dutch, the British and the
French from the 17th to the 20th centuries. (For some reason, Russian
imperialism in Central Asia gets a pass - so far.) Israel is allegedly an
outpost of European imperialism.

The original western imperial enterprise in the radical Islamic narrative
was the Crusades. The First Crusade began in 1095. The Crusades were
undertaken to reclaim the Holy Land for Christendom. Reclaim it from whom?
From the Muslims.

But Mohammed died in Medina in 632 as ruler of the Hijaz, the northwest
section of Arabia along the Red Sea which includes the holy cities of Mecca
and Medina. But if they controlled the Hijaz in 632, what were the Muslims
doing in Jerusalem in 1100?

Of course, they were there by conquest! They were they by virtue of Islamic
imperialism - the extension of the Land of Islam (Dar al-Islam) by holy war:
jihad (notwithstanding the other meanings of this term).

Let's review. Muhammad, the founder of Islam, was a warrior and ruler who
conquered Mecca and the Hijaz from his base in Medina. Following The
Prophet's death in 632, Islam was spread by Arab and Muslim conquest. There
are Muslims who are not Arabs, but the first phase of expansion was Arab
expansion. The ruler of the Muslim world, the successor to Muhammad, was
the Caliph - "the shadow of God on earth."

The Caliph was both the religious and political head of the Muslim world
which, unlike the Christian world, draws no distinction between the two. In
North Africa and the Middle East, the lands that the Arab Muslim world
expanded into were controlled by the Byzantine Empire, the successor to the
Roman Empire, with its capital at Constantinople. These were Christian
lands. To the East, between the Middle East and India, was the Persian
Empire with a different religious tradition.

At the death of Muhammad in 632, the realm of Islam consisted of northwest
Arabia. To the north and west is Christian Byzantium, to the east is
Persia. Neither of these are Arab; neither of them are Muslim. But within
100 years, the territory from Persia to Spain is controlled by Muslim Arabs.
How did this happen? Egypt, for instance, was not in 632 an Arab country.
It was of a different ethnic stock and had been in existence for 3600 years!

What happened was conquest, one of the most impressive in history. Here is
a very brief timeline:

1. 630 - Muhammad conquers Mecca from his base in Medina.
2. 632 - Muhammad dies in Medina. Islam controls the Hijaz.
3. 636 - conquest of Syria. Victory in battle over the Byzantines gives
Syria and the surrounding lands, all Christian - including Palestine and
Iraq - to the Caliph.
4. 636 - 642 Persia conquered by the Muslims.
5. 642 - conquest of Egypt. The Arab/Muslim conquest moves west along
North Africa into hitherto non-Arab/non-Muslim lands.

1st Muslim invasion of Europe: from the West

1. 711 - Tariq (after whom Gibraltar is named: the Rock of Tariq - Gib
al-Tariq) invades Spain. The Muslim conquest moves into Europe.
2. 718 - conquest of Spain complete.
3. 732 - Muslim invasion of France is stopped at the Battle of Poitiers
(also called the Battle of Tours). This is regarded as one of the turning
points in world history. The Franks, under their leader Charles Martel (the
grandfather of Charlemagne), defeat the Muslims and turn them back out of
France.

Thus, in exactly 100 years, from the death of The Prophet in 632, to 732,
the Arab/Muslim realm has extended from the Hijaz, a province in Arabia, to
encompass Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Persia, Egypt, the North African littoral,
Spain and, temporarily, part of France. The first European interaction with
Islam is with Islam in the role of a conquering army, and, in the case of
Spain, one that comes to stay. Spain becomes a Muslim colony. Over several
hundred years, Spain is reconquered - the reconquista - for Christendom.
The last Moors are expelled in 1492 by Ferdinand and Isabella.

In the 1300's, the Turks take over leadership of the Muslim world from the
Arabs. They establish the Ottoman Empire with its capital at Christian
Constantinople after conquering it in 1453. The Muslim world under Ottoman
leadership begins incursions into Europe from the East.

2nd Muslim invasion of Europe: from the East

1. 1453 - Muslim Turks conquer Christian Constantinople and make it the
seat of the Caliphate
2. 1456 - Muslims conquer Athens
3. 1478 - Serbia, Bosnia, Crimea come under Ottoman control
4. 1480 - Otranto in Italy taken by the Ottomans
5. 1529 - Vienna besieged by the Ottomans
6. 1683 - Battle of Vienna. The Turks are defeated by the Polish king
Jan Sobieski leading a combined Polish-Lithuanian army. This is the
high-water-mark of Turkish/Muslim conquest of Europe from the East.

1683 is an important year because after that the Muslim Empire had no
further military successes over the West. Thus, while this date seems lost
in the mists of time to most Westerners, it remains a vivid memory in
Islamic history because it marks the beginning of a downward slide in
military fortunes that ended with the defeat of the Ottoman Empire by the
British and French in World War I, the occupation of Muslim lands by the
European states, and finally the abolition of the Caliphate itself by
Mustafa Kemal (Ataturk) in 1924.

But in the 1980's, something important happened. When the Russians invaded
Afghanistan in 1979, the U.S. decided that it would support the native
Afghan resistance, the mujahedeen. This resulted in a massive arms support
operation by the CIA funneled through the Pakistani intelligence service the
ISI. Thus, the American hand was concealed from the mujahedeen. When,
particularly with the help of the Stinger missile, the Russians were
defeated by the mujahedeen, this represented in their own eyes a victory of
Islamic forces over those of a modern state - indeed, a superpower -
something not seen since the 17th century in the Muslim world. Here was a
model to be built on.

1. 1979 - Soviet Union invades Afghanistan
2. 1988 - Soviet Union leaves Afghanistan, defeated by the Muslim
mujahedeen. A victory for Islam over the "West."
3. 1991 - Soviet Union disintegrates. Who can say that its defeat by the
Muslims was not its mortal blow?

3rd Muslim invasion of Europe: from the South

And now we find ourselves confronted by a third Muslim attack on the West -
a third "invasion of Europe" (if "Europe" is expanded to include North
America) by an expansionary Muslim philosophy - by Islamic radicalism. The
first Muslim attack was from the West in the 700's; the second was from the
East in the 1400's - 1600's; the third began with the defeat of the Soviet
Union in 1988 in Afghanistan and its subsequent collapse and is in the form
of mass immigration.

The philosopher and economist Thomas Sowell instructs us to ask "as compared
to what?" when evaluating and criticizing human enterprise. It is pointless
to compare human enterprise to some abstract ideal that has never existed.
As Sowell points out, if the standard is set high enough, anything will
fail.

Was the British Empire - the archetype of Western imperialism - a bad thing?
As compared to what? As compared to the Muslim Empires? As compared to
them, the British Empire was a model of enlightenment. The Muslims pride
themselves on their tolerance of minorities. But that tolerance came at the
cost of dhimmitude - second-class citizenship and payment of tributes. The
British Empire was, yes, established by force, but it was not sustained only
by force. It was also sustained by consent. And it left behind a number of
the freest, richest, most liberal countries on earth. As compared to the
Muslims, the British look pretty good.

But it is not the point of this paper that Arab/Muslim imperialism was an
evil, or at least was not a unique evil. It was a human enterprise with its
strengths and weaknesses. Muslim culture at its highest was high indeed.
The Muslims preserved and passed on the Greeks. The Arabs developed Arabic
numerals, and invented the number zero (or the next best thing, recognized
the significance of the Indians having done so), the basis of modern
mathematics. Algebra is an Arabic word: al-gebera. Muslim letters,
science, medicine and architecture were at the highest level of achievement.

But so are our own. We can't have a double standard here - being impressed
by the achievements and conquests of Arab/Muslim civilization but at the
same time embarrassed by the even more impressive achievements and conquests
of the West. If conquest is something to be embarrassed by, if it is a
moral disqualification, then the Arab/Muslims are at the head of the line;
Europe is well back on the list! And whatever the achievements of medieval
Muslim culture, and they were many, they are in the past. There are few
achievements today, and none to compare with those of the West.

Yes, one can certainly ask about spiritual achievement. If the Muslims wish
to live in the 8th century, nobody is stopping them. Just as nobody stops
the Amish from living in the 18th century. But if the standard is living in
the 21st century, then it is clear that the West is a superior culture in
all respects for that - in comfort of living, in science, in medicine, in
human rights, in the rights of women to name just a few.

We are in a fight for our lives against Islamic radicalism. We cannot
unilaterally disarm ourselves morally because of some imagined slights
offered to Muslim culture by the West. Yes, we are the stronger, but that
was not always so. When Muslims were the stronger, they prided themselves
on their conquests and their cultural and political dominance, which still
shape the world we live in.


http://www.americanthinker.com/2006/11/primer_on_islamic_imperialism.html



--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

no comments

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:29:24 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/klare_worte_aus_schweden_gef5hrlicher_kurs_f9r_eur_339157420t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/klare_worte_aus_schweden_gef5hrlicher_kurs_f9r_eur_339157420t.html
Am 4. juli brachte Jyllands-Posten einen artikel von Alf Ronnby, dozent an
der universität Göteborg. Der artikel trägt die überschrift 'Der islam ist
religion und politik'.

Hier macht der verfasser darauf aufmerksam, dass der islam nicht nur eine
religion ist, sondern dass der islam eine politische religion ist mit dem
ehrgeiz, die dominierende macht in der gesellschaft und der welt zu werden.

Alf Ronnby schreibt u a:


'In unseren tagen sind es nicht moslemische truppen, die in Europa
eindringen. Die invasion drückt sich auf andere weise aus.

Europa ist in den letzten 20 bis 30 jahren unter moslemischem druck. Grosse
einwanderer- und flüchtlingsströme aus den moslemischen ländern sind
hierhergekommen.

Gemäss dem buch The Third Islamic Invasion of Europe sind heute ca 30
millionen moslems in Europa - und sie strömen weiter herbei.

In 20 jahren werden es wohl doppelt so viele sein.

Ist das ein problem? Nicht unbedingt, aber wir haben gesehen, dass ein teil
der moslems sich nicht wohl fühlt in unseren gesellschaften. Ja, manchmal
verachten sie unsere kultur und wollen sie zerstören.

Islamistische terrorangriffe an verschiedenen stellen Europas sind ausdruck
dafür. Aber auf längere sicht entsteht vielleicht ein grösseres problem mit
der moslemischen einwanderung.

Das, was den islam als religion spezifisch macht ist, dass der islam in sich
selber klar politisch ist. Der islam unterscheidet nicht zwischen der
bürgergesellschaft und dem staat.

Die islamische gesellschaft ist auch der staat und die geführte politik. Der
islam unterscheidet auch nicht zwischen dem geistlichen und dem weltlichen.
Alle öffentlichen und privaten angelegenheiten fallen unter das heilige
gesetz, scharia.

Der islam ist in hohem grad traditionsträger und darum politisch
konservativ, was deutlich sichtbar ist in moslemischen gesellschaften.'


Das muss politiker und meinungsbildner dazu bringen zu stoppen und
nachzudenken, auf welchem gefährlichen kurs sich Europa bewegt.

Der islam ist eine religion, die ziemlich stark wächst. Die moslems machen
heute 19,2 %% der weltbevölkerung aus, ca 1,3 mia, und sie haben die 17,4 %%
der katoliken überholt, ca 1,1 mia.

Jedoch haben die christen (protestanten, katoliken, ortodoxe u a) weiterhin
eine mehrheit mit ca 33 %% der weltbevölkerung. Solange sie noch andauert...


http://dendanskeforening.dk/side363-cid-1-aid-2178-mid-1-params-2.html



------------------------------


Was sind die mitglieder unserer 'elite' nur für komplette idioten...





--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

1 Comment

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:07:06 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/wenn_ihr_dachtet_ihr_solltet_auf_osteurop_339128748t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/wenn_ihr_dachtet_ihr_solltet_auf_osteurop_339128748t.html

Thank you for your letter addressed to President Klaus regarding the
ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. Since unanimity of all the EU member
states is required in order for the Lisbon Treaty to be ratified and one
member state voted against it, the ratification cannot be continued and the
Treaty cannot take effect. Not only the ratification of the Treaty must stop
now, but also the implementation of the Treaty must stop now.

The following are President Klaus's press statements in the wake of the
Irish referendum:

"The Lisbon Treaty project ended today with the decision of the Irish voters
and its ratification cannot be continued. In one of the 27 EU countries a
referendum on the Lisbon Treaty was held. In one only EU country the
politicians allowed the citizens to express their opinion. The result is
hopefully a clear message to everybody. It is a victory of freedom and
reason over artificial elitist projects and over the European bureaucracy."

"The whole of Europe should thank the Irish people for slowing down the
current erroneous processes towards more unification, towards the
suppression of nation states, towards a 'Europe of regions', and towards
greater centralization from above, which the Lisbon Treaty embodied. The
referendum was a perfect example of what ordinary people think about this
development - at odds with the EU-supporting politicians whose motivation
lies elsewhere."

"I cannot imagine any development other than recognition of the fact that
this is not the way to go. Let's seek a European model different from a
supranational state with its centre in Brussels . Let's go back to a
community of friendly, effectively cooperating states. Let's keep most of
the competencies on the level of states."

"We should let people living on the European continent be Czechs, Poles,
Italians, Danes, and not make Europeans of them. That is a flawed project.
The difference between a Czech, a Pole, an Italian and a Dane (as random
examples) and a European is akin to the difference between Czech, Polish,
Danish languages and Esperanto. 'Europeanness' is Esperanto: an artificial
language."

"Ratification cannot be continued, the Treaty can no longer enter into
force. To continue as though nothing has happened would be pure hypocrisy.
This would be more significant news about the 'state of the Union ' than the
Irish NO. The ratification of the Lisbon Treaty in the Czech Republic ended
last Friday. To pretend something else is undignified - at least if we
presume to live in a world where one plus one equals two."

You can find more information in English on www.klaus.cz. The Czech
Constitutional Court continues to scrutinize the compliance of the Lisbon
Treaty with the Constitution. In this respect the President's reply to the
Court of June 3 (i.e. before the Irish vote) is still up-to-date and you can
find its English translation on the website (the 5 concluding questions are
crucial and I believe they will be of interest to you).

I would like to thank you, once again, for your kind feedback, as well as
for the wishes for the President's early recovery.


Gefunden auf http://www.hetvrijevolk.com/?pagina=6528




--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

no comments

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:33:44 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/foto_back_to_school_339124908t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/foto_back_to_school_339124908t.html
http://www.hetvrijevolk.com/files/plastisch/back-to-school-g.jpg





--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

no comments

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 02:23:59 PDT http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/d_339117740t.html http://www.nnseek.com/e/at.gesellschaft.politik/d_339117740t.html Es ist ein empfindliches politisches tema, aber nun nehmen d

Posted In: at.gesellschaft.politik

9 Comments

Reply

]]> Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:58:27 PDT