> Tang Huyen wrote:
>

>> Robert Epstein wrote:

>

>>>Tang Huyen wrote:

>

>>>>DharmaTroll wrote:

>

>>>>>Shirley Knott:

>

>>>>>>You are showing your true colours, including
>>>>>>lack of compassion and discrimination against
>>>>>>the disabled and/or disadvantaged. Nice one!

>

>>>>>I'm supposed to be nice to the paranoid cripple
>>>>>who throws rocks at me? You're going for the
>>>>>pity routine now? I only mirror back what you
>>>>>give; your being paranoid and crippled doesn't
>>>>>change that. In fact, here on usenet you seem
>>>>>to enjoy flinging your feces just like all the
>>>>>healthy monkeys. And now you want
>>>>>compassion? Hah.

>

>>>>Jigme (the fake DharmaTroll) wrote the
>>>>above to Shirley, who is afflicted with MS.

>

>>>>Will the "compassion" squad do anything?
>>>>Will the "right speech" squad do anything?

>

>>>First of all, this kind of talk is characteristic of the real
>>>Dharmtroll, not Jigme. So you will hold onto your silly illusion
>>>despite any kind of evidence.

>

>>>Second of all, yes, what he is saying is objectionable, but on the other
>>>hand he and Shirley seem to be equally matched. Personally I'm going to
>>>stay out of it.

>

>> I replied to your post, but a second reply
>> is worth it also.

>

>> You say that Jigme (the fake DharmaTroll)
>> "and Shirley seem to be equally matched".
>> She is an MS sufferer who takes a long time
>> to type up any post even a short one.

>

>> You must have delivered the worst insult
>> to Jigme that can be imagined (or that
>> cannot be imagined). I could never
>> compete with you on it. Congratulations!

>

>> Tang Huyen

>
> Tang, I have asked you about twenty times why you continue to be
> convinced that DT is really Jigme. You have never shared with me what
> your evidence or logic is in thinking this, despite DT displaying his
> usual style. Why would you continue to think he is Jigme? I am just
> curious whether this obsession of yours is at all based on evidence.
>
> If you choose not to answer this again in specifics, could you at least
> give me an idea why you can't answer this question?
>
> Robert
>
> = = = = = =