|
|
Up |
  |
Author: AfzeeAfzee
Date: Jun 29, 2007 01:13
Are you Blogger or if you think your blog posts are funny enough,
smart enough, and creative enough, you'll see your very own list
crediting YOU and YOUR BLOG. Send lists to: afzal.bpl@ gmail.com On
your mark, see you at: Afzal-Khan LISTOFF! Blog.
http://afzal-khan.blogspot.com/
Search engine marketing blog covering search engine news, resources
and tactics including SEO (search engine optimization), internet
marketing, business blog marketing and online public relations for
search engine marketing professionals and industry media.
Top Rank SEO Blog :- http://toprankseo.blogspot.com/
http://seocompetition-toprankseo.blogspot.com/
SEO Resume Blog :- http://seoresumes.blogspot.com/
On your mark, enjoy your life at fullest.
Live Life King Size!!!
Warm Regard's
Afzal Khan
Internet Marketing & SEO Professional
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Blinky the SharkBlinky the Shark
Date: Jun 28, 2007 21:41
Steve Sobol wrote:
> On 2007-06-29, Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> Is it commercial? That's a criterion you seem to be ignoring.
>
> Political spam is not commercial in nature, but it's still spam. Bulk
> is more important than commercial. IMHO of course.
Use what applies. Bulk is more important if it's a bulk mailing;
"unsolicited commercial" is more important if it's not a bulk mailing.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Steve SobolSteve Sobol
Date: Jun 28, 2007 21:22
On 2007-06-29, Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Is it commercial? That's a criterion you seem to be ignoring.
Political spam is not commercial in nature, but it's still spam. Bulk is more
important than commercial. IMHO of course.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: ViperViper
Date: Jun 28, 2007 19:03
Joe wrote:
> Hi. We got domain and emails registered with Register.com
>
You went with a crappy register and you expected more?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Blinky the SharkBlinky the Shark
Date: Jun 28, 2007 18:10
Doc O'Leary wrote:
> In article , "Hello"
> cox.net> wrote:
>
>> i'm just like other "mass emailers", where i am emailing prospective
>> users of my product (and no it's not penis pills, africa scams,
>> ebooks, dating, etc etc) in hopes some will want/need my services i'm
>> pushing.
>
> You've just admitted you're a spammer, and apparently one who is
> naively trying to skirt anti-spam measures. Kindly fuck off and die.
Doc, while the OP has generated a useful thread (at least useful if some
people learn that "bulk" is not a necessary component of spam) I
nominate your reply to OP as the best for its
candid-while-being-accurate nature. :)
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: WindsorFoxWindsorFox
Date: Jun 28, 2007 16:58
> I had someone keep entering bogus information into my databases, i.e
> creating fake accounts.
Spammers.
> I checked his IP and his IP address changed
> every few minutes. All the ips originated from random places in the
> USA, like new york , missouri, etc. How easy is it for someone to do
Spambots on owned machines. That's why you have to keep your apps
updated and use counter measures to stop the bots from registering.
> this? What is there to protect websites from such behavior?
>
Yes, it's called a router. Block all the IPs from even seeing your
web site. Start with China and Brazil. Add places like Layered
Technologies that seem to have being a spammer/hacker as a prerequisite
for becoming a customer.
--
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
"Your" a retard. - Herb Tarlek
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: HeidiHeidi
Date: Jun 28, 2007 14:42
alt.www.webmaster FAQ
Last revised: June 3, 2006
The current version is located at:
http://www.aww-faq.org
Welcome to alt.www.webmaster (AWW). Thank you for
taking the time to read this information. This FAQ
is not meant to be a set of rules. It is simply
a guide to help new users become acquainted with
how the group operates, some useful information,
and some of our favorite links. All the suggestions
in the section titled "Posting Messages in AWW" are
based on the assumption that people are willing to
cooperate and observe some conventions in order to
facilitate the smooth operation of the group. We
hope you will find the newsgroup and this FAQ to be
useful resources and we welcome your participation.
|
| Show full article (13.64Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Matt ProbertMatt Probert
Date: Jun 28, 2007 00:06
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:28:54 -0700, dr_phill123@ yahoo.com wrote:
>On Jun 27, 6:59 pm, Jerry Stuckle attglobal.net> wrote:
>>> I had someone keep entering bogus information into my databases, i.e
>>> creating fake accounts...
|
| Show full article (1.19Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: joboilsjoboils
Date: Jun 27, 2007 23:38
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:50:27 GMT, mbstevens
xmbstevensx.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:35:48 -0700, idiotprogrammer wrote:
>
>> By the way, while I agree with your general point about page size,
>> keep in mind that gizmodo and engadget have huge home pages as well.
>> (One seemed to have 790K, if I recall).
>
>They must be willing to burn their bridges against dial up visitors.
>
>
>
At the risk of seeming to have mis-understood the whole blogging
thing, it seems to me that blogs are just elevated diaries which give
visitors the chance to add their thoughts(?) to a particular theme
chosen from time to time. You have so many diferent topics I would
have thought you'd be better off with a bulletin board / discussion
forum / whatever you want to call them. I run several of these and
have never found them lacking anything essential a blog can offer.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
  |
Author: Mark GoodgeMark Goodge
Date: Jun 27, 2007 23:29
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:43:38 -0700, Hello put finger to keyboard and
typed:
>I did contact my ISP -
>their response was it's a dyanmic variable that they use to determine spam
>potentials.
>
>...and they cannot give me no exact number of emails, otherwise spammers
>would send just 1- under that detection limit.
>
>
>
>does anyone know what's a 'safe' average per time interval to send out "mass
>emails"?
Spam has absolutely nothing to do with quantity. Spam is about
permission. If you have a genuinely opt-in list of a million
subscribers, then sending them all an email is not spam. If you have a
harvested list of ten addresses, then sending them all an email is
spam.
|
| Show full article (0.82Kb) |
|
4 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|