http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20061024&articleId...

US naval war games off the Iranian coastline: A provocation which could
lead to War?

By Michel Chossudovsky

October 24, 2006

There is a massive concentration of US naval power in the Persian Gulf
and the Arabian Sea. Two US naval strike groups are deployed: USS
Enterprise, and USS Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group. The naval
strike groups have been assigned to fighting the "global war on terrorism."

War Games

Concurrent with this concentration of US Naval power, the US is also
involved in military exercises in the Persian Gulf, which consists in
"interdicting ships in the Gulf carrying weapons of mass destruction and
missiles"

The exercise is taking place as the United States and other major powers
are considering sanctions including possible interdiction of ships on
North Korea, following a reported nuclear test, and on Iran, which has
defied a U.N. Security Council mandate to stop enriching uranium.

The exercise, set for Oct. 31, is the 25th to be organized under the
U.S.-led 66-member Proliferation Security Initiative and the first to be
based in the Gulf near Bahrain, across from Iran, the officials said.

A senior U.S. official insisted the exercise is not aimed specifically
at Iran, although it reinforces a U.S. strategy aimed at strengthening
America’s ties with states in the Gulf, where Tehran and Washington are
competing for influence"

(Defense News, http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=2171176&C=mideast)

Tehran considers the US sponsored war games in the Persian Gulf, off the
Iranian coastline as a provocation, which is intended to trigger a
potential crisis and a situation of direct confrontation between US and
Iranian naval forces in the Persian Gulf:

"Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise
intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction
and missiles.

Iran's official news agency IRNA quoted an unnamed foreign ministry
official as describing the military manoeuvres as dangerous and suspicious.

Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise
intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction
and missiles.

The Iranian foreign ministry official said the US-led exercises were not
in line with the security and stability of the region. Instead, they are
aimed at fomenting crises, he said." (quoted in BBC, 23 October 2006)

USS Boxer Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG 5) to arrive in Arabian Sea

The USS Boxer (LHD 4), --which is the flagship for the Boxer
Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG 5)-- which left Singapore on October 16,
is scheduled to join the two other naval strikes groups. ESG 5 is
comprised of USS Boxer, Bunker Hill, USS Dubuque (LPD 8), USS Comstock
(LSD 45), USS Benfold (DDG 65), and USS Howard (DDG 83). ESG 5 also
includes PHIBRON 5, the 15th MEU, Coast Guard Cutter Midgett (WHEC 726).

“We are about to enter a part of the world that can be very dangerous,”
said Chief Aviation Ordnanceman (AW/SW) Jacques Beaver, Boxer’s flight
deck ordnance chief. “We must be flexible and prepared to defend
ourselves from any threats.”

Boxer has been preparing for the weapons upload for two months by
completing required maintenance and electronic pre-checks. Checks ensure
that the ship’s missile and launching systems are up to standard and
safe to load with live ordnance.

“It has taken a lot of hard work for our people to get this done,” said
Chief Fire Controlman (SW) William Lewis, combat systems, fire control
division’s leading chief petty officer. “You cannot measure the
importance of having these defenses guarding the lives of the Sailors
and Marines in this strike group.”

BOXESG is comprised of USS Boxer (LHD 4), USS Bunker Hill (CG 52), USS
Dubuque (LPD 8), USS Comstock (LSD 45), USS Benfold (DDG 65) and USS
Howard (DDG 83). The strike group also includes Amphibious Squadron 5,
the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, Coast Guard Cutter Midgett (WHEC
726) and Canadian Frigate HMCS Ottawa (FFH 341).

BOXESG is currently conducting operations in support of the global war
on terrorism while transiting to the Arabian Gulf [sic]."
(http://www.c7f.navy.mil/news/2006/october/3.htm)

The amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4) departs Naval Base San
Diego on a scheduled Western Pacific deployment as part of Expeditionary
Strike Group Five (ESG-5).
USS Boxer

Canada is part of the Expeditonary Strike Group (ESG 5)

Canada is formally participating in this military deployment under the
disguise of the "war on terrorism". The Canadian Navy has dispatched
Frigate HMCS Ottawa, which is now an integral part of ESG 5, under US
Command. It is worth noting that particular emphasis has been given to
medical evacuations and combat medical support suggesting that a combat
scenario could be envisaged.

Boxer and Ottawa, both operating in the U.S. 7th Fleet area of
responsibility, know that they can play a vital role to aid humanitarian
assistance operations, medical evacuations or combat medical support
that would rely heavily on the medical capabilities of the Boxer strike
group. Cross training Sailors from ship to ship helps ensure the success
of the strike group should BOXESG have to respond to any medical
scenario, according to Richardson.

“Training is a necessary part of any evolution,” said Richardson.
“Anytime you’re working with another nation, it’s important that we
understand their capabilities just as much as they understand ours, so
in the event anything occurs we know where our assets are.”

The cross training also fostered cooperation between the two allies
which provided Verville and Boxer corpsmen a forum to learn about each
other’s navies and each other’s culture." (Military.com October 2006)

Dangerous Crossroads: Tonkin II?

"An incident" in the Persian Gulf could be used by the US as a pretext
for war against Iran.

A war pretext incident, similar to "the Gulf of Tonkin Incident", which
triggered the Vietnam war, could be used by US forces, with a view to
justifying retaliatory military action against Iran.

In August 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson claimed that North
Vietnamese forces had attacked US destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin. The
Tonkin incident, which had been manipulated, contributed to unleashing a
full-fledged war against Vietnam:

"A phantom attack on two U.S. destroyers cruising the Gulf of Tonkin was
staged by the Pentagon and the C.I.A. The bogus attack occurred early in
August, 1964. That evening President Lyndon Johnson went on television
giving the grim details of the non-attack. Later, however, it was
revealed that navy commander James Stockdale flew cover over the Gulf of
Tonkin that night. Stockdale disclosed that U.S. ships were firing at
phantom targets—targets that didn’t exist. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident
that drew the U.S. into the quagmire of Viet Nam simply didn’t happen.
Johnson, as presidents so often do, lied to the American people. The
result was the rapid passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which was
the sole legal basis for the Viet Nam War. As a result of Johnson’s lie,
three million Vietnamese people and fifty eight thousand U.S. soldiers
died." (Charles Sullivan, Global Research, January 2006)

Revised and updated Oct 25, 2006. Note: Since this report was first
published, we have been advised that several press reports concerning
USS Eisenhower are incorrect. US military sources have confirmed that
USS Eisenhower was in Naples on Oct 23.

We have made appropriate corrections.
ANNEX: US NAVY

Navy Personnel
Active Duty: 349,783

Officers: 51,979

Enlisted: 293,368

Midshipmen: 4,436
Ready Reserve: 131,802 [As of 30 September]

Selected Reserves: 70,500

Individual Ready Reserve: 61,302
Reserves currently mobilized: 5,996 [As of 18 October]
Personnel on deployment: 36,037
Navy Department Civilian Employees: 175,454
Ships and Submarines
Deployable Battle Force Ships: 280

Ships Underway (away from homeport): 133 ships (47%% of total)

On deployment: 104 ships (37%% of total)

Attack submarines underway
(away from homeport): 22 submarines (40%%)

On deployment: 11 submarines (20%%)
Ships Underway

Carriers:
USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63) - Philippine Sea
USS Enterprise (CVN 65) - Persian Gulf
USS Nimitz (CVN 68) - Pacific Ocean
USS Dwight D.Eisenhower (CVN 69)- Mediterranean Sea
USS Ronald Reagan - Pacific Ocean

Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG):
USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7) - Persian Gulf
USS Nashville (LPD 13) - Persian Gulf
USS Whidbey Island (LSD 41) - Persian Gulf

Boxer Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG):
USS Boxer (LHD 4) - Indian Ocean
USS Dubuque (LPD 8) - Indian Ocean
USS Comstock (LSD 45) - Indian Ocean

Essex Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG):
USS Essex (LHD 2) - South China Sea
USS Juneau (LPD 10) - South China Sea
USS Harpers Ferry (LSD 49) - South China Sea

Amphibious Warfare Ships:
USS Tarawa (LHA 1) - Pacific Ocean
USS Saipan (LHA 2) - Persian Gulf
USS Wasp (LHD 1) - port visit, Copenhagen, Denmark
USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Bataan (LHD 5) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Cleveland (LPD 7) - Pacific Ocean
USS Shreveport (LPD 12) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Ponce (LPD 15) - Atlantic Ocean
USS San Antonio (LPD 17) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Ashland (LSD 48) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52) - Pacific Ocean

Aircraft (operational): 4000+

currently/or en route in/to Persian Gulf-Arabian Sea
(according to available information)

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the
Centre for Research on Globalization.

To become a Member of Global Research

The Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG) at www.globalresearch.ca
grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles in
their entirety, or any portions thereof, on community internet sites, as
long as the text & title are not modified. The source must be
acknowledged and an active URL hyperlink address to the original CRG
article must be indicated. The author's copyright note must be
displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other
forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has
not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
making such material available to our readers under the provisions of
"fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political,
economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted
material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission
from the copyright owner.