Militants Handed Over to "Home Countries"...
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.war.terrorism only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Militants Handed Over to "Home Countries"...         

Group: alt.war.terrorism · Group Profile
Author: FalconsLair
Date: Aug 30, 2008 09:32

8/30/2008: Intel News Brief: Militants Handed Over to "Home
Countries":

US-Military-Intervention:
The US military has secretly handed over more than 200 militants to
the intelligence services of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other countries,
nearly all in the past two years, as part of an effort to reduce the
burden of detaining and interrogating foreign fighters captured in
Iraq and Afghanistan, The New York Times said citing US military
officials.

The system is similar in some ways to the rendition program used by
the Central Intelligence Agency since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks on the United States to secretly transfer people suspected of
being militants back to their home countries to be jailed and
questioned.

But there are significant differences; the prisoners can block their
transfers to home countries, military officials say.

Officials of the International Committee of the Red Cross interview
all detainees before they are returned to their home countries, said
Bernard Barrett, a Red Cross spokesman.

These militants are initially held, without notification to the Red
Cross, sometimes for weeks at a time, in secret at a camp in Iraq and
another in Afghanistan run by U.S. Special Operations forces, the
military officials said. They said that foreign intelligence officers
had been allowed access to these camps to question militants there, as
a prelude to the transfers.

In interviews, the military officials said the transfers represented
an effort by the United States to find a better way to detain and
interrogate the militants.

The US military's prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the secret
prisons abroad run by the CIA have drawn criticism, and there have
been concerns over the use of Iraqi and Afghan jails.

Some have questioned whether those facilities should play any future
role in housing terrorism suspects.

As a rationale for the approach, the US officials said that language
skills and cultural knowledge in most cases made the Saudis, Egyptians
and others best suited to question the captured suspects, and best
equipped to act on any intelligence they provide about militant
networks in their countries.

The effort was described in interviews over the past six weeks with
more than a dozen current and former U.S. military, intelligence and
foreign policy officials.

Unlike in Afghanistan, where many prisoners captured by US forces were
sent to Guantanamo Bay in the first five years after the Sept. 11
attacks, prisoners captured by the United States in Iraq have never
been sent to US detention centers outside Iraq, and until The New York
Times began to conduct interviews for this article in July, military
officials had not acknowledged that any had been repatriated.

US military officials said the transfers required assurances that the
prisoners would be well taken care of, but they would not specify
those assurances, and human rights advocates questioned whether
compliance could be monitored.

While the militants are in US custody, Pentagon rules allow them to be
held at the Special Operations sites in Balad, Iraq, and Bagram,
Afghanistan, for up to two weeks, with extensions permitted with the
approval of Defense Secretary Robert Gates or his representative,
military officials said. About 30 to 40 foreign prisoners are held at
the Iraq camp at any given time, the officials said; they did not
provide an estimate for the Afghan camp but suggested that the number
was smaller.

Saudi and Egyptian intelligence officers have been permitted to
interrogate militants at the camps, although US military officials say
that the foreign interrogators who operate in the US camps are
monitored by American soldiers and that they must follow American
rules.

They said restrictions on interrogation techniques and on the length
of secret detentions were carefully regulated, a response to problems
within the US military detention system, including the abuses at Abu
Ghraib prison in Iraq and the Special Operations site in Balad, Iraq,
that emerged beginning in 2004.

The officials said the prisoners who were repatriated were sent home
only after being moved into the general US-run prison population, a
step that meant that their names were reported to the Red Cross.

In all, they said, 214 prisoners in Iraq and at least two more in
Afghanistan have been transferred to the custody of their home
countries over the past four years, and while the Iraqi government has
helped to facilitate some of the transfers, they were not subject to
the approval of either the Iraqi government or the Afghan government.
Source: Morning Intel News Brief via Islamic Republic News Agency
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!