> http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/
>
> "Original photo":http://www.daylife.com/photo/0gjafLz8Zg5wW/missiles_iran
>
> A video grab from Al Alam television of same launch
> <http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2008/07/09/iran_te
> sts_missiles_and_vows_to_hit_back_if_attacked/>
>
> An Iranian news agency photo that shows four missiles fired
> simultaneously, apparently on Wednesday, seems to have been digitally
> altered to show one missile in the air that was not actually launched,
> according to the official.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/10/missile.iran/index.html

> On Jul 10, 3:38 pm, nos...@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

>> http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/
>>
>> "Original photo":http://www.daylife.com/photo/0gjafLz8Zg5wW/missiles_iran
>>
>> A video grab...

> coonass ricochet.com> wrote:

>> On Jul 10, 3:38 pm, nos...@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

>>>http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/

>

>>> "Original photo":http://www.daylife.com/photo/0gjafLz8Zg5wW/missiles_iran

>

>>> A video grab from Al Alam television of same launch
>>> <http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2008/07/09/iran_te
>>> sts_missiles_and_vows_to_hit_back_if_attacked/>

>

>>> An Iranian news agency photo that shows four missiles fired
>>> simultaneously, apparently on Wednesday, seems to have been digitally
>>> altered to show one missile in the air that was not actually launched,
>>> according to the official.

>

>>>http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/10/missile.iran/index.html

>

>> To answer your question, why on Earth would CIA offer bogus
>> information about the provenance of a photo that could be exposed as ...

> On Jul 11, 2:38 pm, nos...@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

>> coonass ricochet.com> wrote:

>>> On Jul 10, 3:38 pm, nos...@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

>>>> http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/
>>>> "Original photo":http://www.daylife.com/photo/0gjafLz8Zg5wW/missiles_iran
>>>> A video grab from Al Alam television of same launch
>>>> <http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2008/07/09/iran_te
>>>> sts_missiles_and_vows_to_hit_back_if_attacked/>
>>>> An Iranian news agency photo that shows four missiles fired
>>>> simultaneously, apparently on Wednesday, seems to have been digitally
>>>> altered to show one missile in the air that was not actually launched,
>>>> according to the official.
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/10/missile.iran/index.html

>>> To answer your question, why on Earth would CIA offer bogus
>>> information about the provenance of a photo that could be exposed as
>>> bogus by anyone familiar with how to analyze digital photos for
>>> tampering?

>> To make Iran look like they faked it.
>> ...

> On Jul 11, 2:38 pm, nos...@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

>> coonass ricochet.com> wrote:

>>> On Jul 10, 3:38 pm, nos...@noway.net (Ralph) wrote:

>>>> http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/
>>>> "Original photo":http://www.daylife.com/photo/0gjafLz8Zg5wW/missiles_iran
>>>> A video grab from Al Alam television of same launch
>>>> <http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2008/07/09/iran_te
>>>> sts_missiles_and_vows_to_hit_back_if_attacked/>
>>>> An Iranian news agency photo that shows four missiles fired
>>>> simultaneously, apparently on Wednesday, seems to have been digitally
>>>> altered to show one missile in the air that was not actually launched,
>>>> according to the official.
>>>> http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/07/10/missile.iran/index.html

>>> To answer your question, why on Earth would CIA offer bogus
>>> information about the provenance of a photo that could be exposed as
>>> bogus by anyone familiar with how to analyze digital photos for
>>> tampering?

>> To make Iran look like they faked it.
>> ...