|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: Hugh LawsonHugh Lawson
Date: Jun 8, 2010 01:51
Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> writes:
> Here is a snip from an Amazon summary of R & R.
>
> "Almost all the dominant views of the Civil War and its aftermath,
> including Reconstruction and "reunion," prevalent in this country until
> the...
|
| Show full article (2.52Kb) |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: [.][.]
Date: Jun 7, 2010 23:41
On Jun 6, 7:01 pm, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> wrote:> "[.]" yahoo.com> writes:>> So
>> what's the harm in asking him directly?
>
> None that I know of. If you want this done you may ask him, and if it
> pleases you, let us know what he says.
>
> Thanks for the interesting questions. Cheers!
Hey, if you don't want to know the answer, that's your choice.
But recall that you asked: "Is this really Blight's position?" Who
would be better able to answer this than David himself? Indeed, isn't
it true that no one else would really know as well as he would?
I find it interesting that you refuse to approach him directly. It's
even more interesting that you ask questions to which you don't really
want to hear anyone else's answers. But even more interesting is that
you do all this on a public forum.
|
| Show full article (1.00Kb) |
|
| |
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: [.][.]
Date: Jun 7, 2010 23:33
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:03:34 -0700 (PDT), "[.]" yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>On Jun 6, 5:21 am, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> wrote:>
>>> The arbiter suggestion, as I proposed it, applies to arguments between
>>> awcusa posters, about the intended meaning of one them in his previous
>>> utterance. It states that each poster shall be the arbiter of his own
>>> intended meaning in a previous utterance.
>
>>> David Blight is not an awcusa poster, and there is no argument here
>>> about something he said in an awcusa post. Hence the arbiter suggestion
>>> does not apply.
>
>>Why not? Are you saying that if one does not participate in one
>>particular group, one is not the arbiter of one's own intent?
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.69Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: [.][.]
Date: May 14, 2010 01:37
On May 13, 3:17 am, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> wrote:> "[.]" yahoo.com> writes:>> Note he doesn't deny that he misrepresented Degler. At least he
>> didn't plagiarize him ... yet.
>
> You are dismissed, Brooks.
>
> Hugh
Note that Hugh G. Lawson still doesn't deny that he misrepresented
Degler. At least he didn't plagiarize him ... yet.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: [.][.]
Date: May 14, 2010 01:35
On May 13, 3:15 am, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> wrote:> Simpson writes:
>> I guess Hu once again resorts to insult
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Simpson writes:
>> Or are you simply a coward?
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Simpson writes:
>> Rant away, my boy. It will prove you're a coward.
>
> As you see, Brooks D. Simpson of Arizona State University in his own
> behavior exemplifies the offenses of which he accuses others.
>
> Hugh Lawson
|
| Show full article (0.91Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: [.][.]
Date: May 14, 2010 01:28
On May 13, 4:17 am, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> wrote:> Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> writes:
>
> [ snip ]
>>> You are dismissed, Brooks.
>
> Let me add Brooks, that I don't take your posts here seriously, any more
> that I took seriously your Duelling Banjos series, or the William Davis
> "Saddam Huey" series.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Hu. Lawson
We all see that in your many replies. :)
You've just illustrated how you've created another self-inflicted
wound. :) Must hurt. :)
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: whowho
Date: May 13, 2010 18:15
On Wed, 12 May 2010 19:18:09 -0400, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com>
wrote:
>"[.]" yahoo.com> writes:
>>>
>> Had Hu/Hugh/HL/Hughie done some reading in regionalism or American
>> literature, let alone politics, he'd discover that there are many
>> dualities in the...
|
| Show full article (1.12Kb) |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: whowho
Date: May 13, 2010 18:13
On Wed, 12 May 2010 15:31:49 -0400, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com>
wrote:
>scribe7716 aol.com> writes:
>>> On May 12, 11:03?am, Hugh Lawson triad.rr.com> wrote:>>>> That the most backward region of the country should be thought...
|
| Show full article (2.23Kb) |
|
4 Comments |
|
|
|
|
