|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: meme
Date: Jun 8, 2010 12:42
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:39:41 +0100, Nick Spalding
wrote:
>
>That's because filtering on it was not in V4 which you are using. It
>came with V5.
You're right about that. Thanks
Gotta find a V5 I guess.
me
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Ralph FoxRalph Fox
Date: Jun 7, 2010 23:32
On Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:23:41 -0700, in message 4ax.com>
joek wrote:
> When I select a message with Agent and attempt to scroll up or down using
> the wheel or center button on my mouse - it may work once or twice before
> it start moving wildly in groups or desks.
> This button works well in everything else except Agent.
> From FF to Office.
> Am I missing another agent setting or is this a feature or flaw?
I take it that what is happening is that the wheel is not moving the pane
which you wanted. Agent is moving the pane which has keyboard focus,
not the pane directly under the mouse pointer. Apart from this, the
movement is steady, not wild.
With most mouse drivers, Agent moves the pane which has keyboard focus.
Some mouse drivers have an option to always scroll the pane under the
mouse pointer. This mouse driver option is known as "universal scrolling".
If your mouse driver does not have this option, download and install
katmouse http://ehiti.de/katmouse/
Your other apps have "universal scrolling" built into the application,
regardless of which mouse driver you are running.
|
| Show full article (1.17Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: hsghsg
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:48
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:01:10 +0200, Martin wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010 10:25:07 -0700, sf geemail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Deja vu! Southend-on-Sea in Essex was just mentioned in another ng
>>> today. It must be a nice place to visit.
>>
>> Southend may well be OK but Bugger Bognor :-)
>
>Remember Harwich is for the Continent and Frinton for the incontinent.
And WALTON is for those that like sandy beaches and bird watching (all types as the
salting's have some marvelous wild sea birds and the pier has some marvelous wild girls
too)
Sir Hugh of Bognor
--
I used to be an Egotistical Megalomaniac - but now I'm just perfect!
Hugh Gundersen
hsg@ h-gee.co.uk
|
| Show full article (0.90Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: steve-canersteve-caner
Date: Jun 7, 2010 22:46
>On Mon, 31 May 2010 10:25:07 -0700, sf geemail.com> wrote:
>>>Deja vu! Southend-on-Sea in Essex was just mentioned in another ng
>>today. It must be a nice place to visit.
>
>Southend may well be OK but Bugger Bognor :-)
>D
Been reading the History books have we - obviously not been there recently but in some
instances I fully agree but only those that attend the local school which should be
renamed Bugger Bognor Regis Community College but the arseholes couldn't spell it.
Steve
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Tony HirtensteinTony Hirtenstein
Date: Jun 7, 2010 21:13
; > > There is no official "standard" for top or bottom posting on Usenet
; > > replies.
But there is a good rule of thumb: NEVER EVER quote more than you
need!!!
--
******************* A.T.Hirtenstein ****************************
West Oxfordshire ******************* highlands.cix.co.uk>
"If you take refuge in God, He will bring what you need when you need it."
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: G. MorganG. Morgan
Date: May 13, 2010 15:17
Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@-.invalid> wrote:
>Some NGs by their nature will have a lower percentage of googlegroups
>subscribers than other groups.
True, this group would be a good example.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Ralph FoxRalph Fox
Date: May 13, 2010 15:15
On Thu, 13 May 2010 01:11:11 -0400, in message <3ocn78.mtf.19.1@ news.alt.net>
blitz wrote:
> Certainly won't hurt anything. I'm a little surprised the regulars
> here haven't jumped in.
I do not have this problem downloading attachments with Agent.
> Leads me to suspect this is a question that's
> either been answered before, and/or there may not be an answer (aka
> 'living with it').
Or that most of the regulars do not have this problem.
I suspect it may be something particular to the OP and a
smallish number of other users. Jamie's suggestion that
it may be the AV is worth checking out.
FWIW I am running AVG. AVG doesn't do this to me.
> It isn't an issue for me, so I tolerate it. Email isn't really the
> best avenue for binary movement anyway, at least IMO.
--
Regards
Ralph
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
Author: G. MorganG. Morgan
Date: May 13, 2010 15:14
Laura Fredericks CLOTHEShotmail.com> wrote:
>IMO googlegroups -- as was it's predecessor, dejanews -- is good for
>ONE thing: archiving messages. Posting should NOT allowed.
Agreed.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author:
Date: Jan 29, 2010 06:48
Hi, is there an easy way to forward a bunch of emails in one of my
folders to one email address? I have a need to have these emails at my
other email address. Thanks.
|
| |
|
1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
