|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Pahu78Pahu78 Date: Apr 3, 2008 15:17
Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
Billions of Years Old? 3
If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory
will fall (with a big bang).
Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of
light (8). Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang
theory are solved if light once traveled millions of times faster (9).
8. "We have shown how a time varying speed of light could provide a
resolution to the well-known cosmological puzzles." Andreas Albrecht
and João Magueijo, "A Time Varying Speed of Light as a Solution to
Cosmological Puzzles," Physical Review D, 15 February 1999, p.
043516-9. [The authors state that light may have traveled thirty
orders of magnitude faster than it does today!]
"It is remarkable when you can find one simple idea [a decaying speed
of light] that has so many appealing consequences." John D. Barrow,
Professor of Astronomy and Director of the Astronomy Centre at the
University of Sussex, as quoted by Steve Farrar, "Speed of Light
Slowing Down," London Sunday Times, 15 November 1998.
|
| Show full article (2.09Kb) |
|
| | 35 Comments |
|
|
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man Date: Apr 3, 2008 16:26
> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
> Billions of Years Old? 3
>
> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory
> will fall (with a big bang).
>
> Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of
> light (8). Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang
> theory are solved if light once traveled millions of times faster (9).
>
> 8. "We have shown how a time varying speed of light could provide a
> resolution to the well-known cosmological puzzles." Andreas Albrecht
> and Jo=E3o Magueijo, "A Time Varying Speed of Light as a Solution to
> Cosmological Puzzles," Physical Review D, 15 February 1999, p.
> 043516-9. [The authors state that light may have traveled thirty
> orders of magnitude faster than it does today!]
>
> "It is remarkable when you can find one simple idea [a decaying speed ...
|
| Show full article (2.66Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: roguerogue Date: Apr 3, 2008 20:17
On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
wrote:>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
>> Billions of Years Old? 3
>
>> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory
>> will fall (with a big bang).
>
>> Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of
>> light (8). Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang
>> theory are solved if light once traveled millions of times faster (9).
>
>> 8. "We have shown how a time varying speed of light could provide a
>> resolution to the well-known cosmological puzzles." Andreas Albrecht ...
|
| Show full article (3.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: roguerogue Date: Apr 3, 2008 20:17
On Apr 4, 7:17 am, rogue hotmail.com> wrote:> On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>> gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
>>> Billions of Years Old? 3
>
>>> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory
>>> will fall (with a big bang).
>
>>> Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of
>>> light (8). Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang
>>> theory are solved if light once traveled millions of times faster (9).
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man Date: Apr 3, 2008 20:30
> On Apr 4, 7:17 am, rogue hotmail.com> wrote:>> On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> gmail.com> wrote in message>>
>>
>>>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
>>>> Billions of Years Old? 3
>>
>>>> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory
>>>> will fall (with a big bang).
>>
>>>> Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of
>>>> light (8). Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang ...
|
| Show full article (4.52Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ElmerElmer Date: Apr 3, 2008 20:47
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> On Apr 4, 7:17 am, rogue hotmail.com> wrote:>>> On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
>>>>> Billions of Years Old? 3
>>>>> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory
>>>>> will fall (with a big bang).
>>>>> Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of
>>>>> light (8). Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang
>>>>> theory are solved if light once traveled millions of times faster
>>>>> (9).
>>>>> 8. "We have shown how a time varying speed of light could provide a ...
|
| Show full article (4.70Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man Date: Apr 3, 2008 20:51
"Elmer" frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:BxhJj.1136$NU2.535@news01.roc.ny...> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>> On Apr 4, 7:17 am, rogue hotmail.com> wrote:>>>> On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
>>>>>> Billions of Years Old? 3
>>>>>> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory
>>>>>> will fall (with a big bang).
>>>>>> Other cosmologists are proposing an enormous decay in the speed of
>>>>>> light (8). Several of their theoretical problems with the big bang
>>>>>> theory are solved if light once traveled millions of times faster ...
|
| Show full article (4.83Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: roguerogue Date: Apr 3, 2008 23:35
On Apr 4, 7:30 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
wrote:>> On Apr 4, 7:17 am, rogue hotmail.com> wrote:>>> On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
>>> wrote:>
>>>> gmail.com> wrote in message>
>
>>>>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
>>>>> Billions of Years Old? 3
>
>>>>> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory ...
|
| Show full article (5.23Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: roguerogue Date: Apr 3, 2008 23:37
On Apr 4, 7:51 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
wrote:> "Elmer" frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>
> news:BxhJj.1136$NU2.535@news01.roc.ny...
>
>
>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>> On Apr 4, 7:17 am, rogue hotmail.com> wrote:>>>>> On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:>
>>>>>>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the Universe
>>>>>>> Billions of Years Old? 3
>>>>>>> If either Setterfield or Troitskii is correct, the big bang theory ...
|
| Show full article (5.16Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Kadaitcha ManKadaitcha Man Date: Apr 3, 2008 23:48
> On Apr 4, 7:30 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
> wrote:>>> On Apr 4, 7:17 am, rogue hotmail.com> wrote:>>>> On Apr 4, 3:26 am, "Kadaitcha Man" gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:>>
>>>>> gmail.com> wrote in message>>
>>
>>>>>> Because Galaxies Are Billions of Light-Years Away, Isn't the
>>>>>> Universe ...
|
| Show full article (5.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
