Re: How to REALLY cut US taxes - ID, deporting
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.usenet.kooks only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: How to REALLY cut US taxes - ID, deporting         

Group: alt.usenet.kooks · Group Profile
Author: Gunner
Date: May 14, 2008 09:56

On Wed, 14 May 2008 09:51:22 -0500, The One True Roger
gawab.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 14 May 2008 01:59:19 -0700, I found that Gunner
>NOSPAM.lightspeed.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom
>wall:
>
>>On Tue, 13 May 2008 23:23:38 -0500, The One True Roger
>>gawab.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 13 May 2008 02:32:39 -0700, I found that Gunner
>>>NOSPAM.lightspeed.net> Scribbled the following on the bathroom
>>>wall:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 12 May 2008 15:06:39 -0500, The One True Roger
>>>>gawab.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 12 May 2008 13:55:02 -0500, I found that Jeff McCann
>>>>>NoThanks.org> Scribbled the following on the bathroom wall:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What happened to the Socus ruling that you did not have to produce ID
>>>>>>> upon demand? IIRC it was back in the early 80's a case where the
>>>>>>> police arrested a man because he refused to supply ID (no probabable
>>>>>>> cause to require such).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Rightards have pretty much gutted the 4th Amendment over the past
>>>>>>several years.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Along with the 1st amendment as well.
>>>>
>>>>The 2nd Amendment we left up to the Left to be gutted.
>>>>
>>>>Gunner
>>>
>>>And just how is that gutted?
>>
>>What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?
>>
>>Gunner
>
>
>I have no problem having my guns.
>
>I have a 30.06, .303, and a 12 guage for hunting.
>I also own Magnum .357

I see you dont live in DC, Morton Grove, or NYC then.
>
>Nobody is infringing on that.

See above. And lets see you carry them with you on the street.
>
>Or are you one of those that thinks you need an AK-47?
>
>Please tell me WHY a citizen needs an AK-47.

Because its my Right.

I see you are one of those that is in favor of censorship as well.

"the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed"

Now Im curious...are the People mentioned above, completely different
from all the other People in the other amendments and the DoI and the
Preamble? The term People appears some 40 + times, and you are
claiming that the People in the 2nd amendment are utterly different
than the other 40 as mentioned?

Fascinating.

Gunner
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!

RELATED THREADS
SubjectArticles qty Group
US-MI: Southfield-Tax Analyst - Corporate Taxesus.jobs ·