|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DaedalusDaedalus Date: Jan 22, 2008 10:32
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:25:12 -0600, "adman" hottmail.net>
wrote:
>
>"Daedalus" newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in message
>news:metbp39cvgpnfrghm9t2v92rbs063snbl4@4ax.com...>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:58:07 -0600, "adman" hottmail.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>"Daedalus"...
|
| Show full article (3.52Kb) |
|
| | 4 Comments |
|
|
Author: Rhonda Lea KirkRhonda Lea Kirk Date: Jan 22, 2008 11:55
gregvk wrote:
> Daedalus newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in
> news:e2dcp3d78328p0qn3qdi0n6f7ssktksjm7@4ax.com:
>>> aggression and intimidation cannot be achieved without a willing
>> victim.
>
> This is easily the most sociopathic thing I've read in about six
> months.
Stating a known fact isn't the same as endorsing a course of action.
> And I don't just mean on Usenet.
>
> [alt.2600 added because I bet fatso can top it]
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
nimue@ databasix.com
Miller's Law: In order to understand what another
person is saying, you must assume that it is true
and try to imagine what it could be true of.
|
| |
|
| | 13 Comments |
|
|
Author: PisanoPisano Date: Jan 22, 2008 12:43
On 22 Jan 2008 20:33:27 GMT, gregvk wrote:
>> gregvk wrote:
>>> Daedalus newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in
>>> news:e2dcp3d78328p0qn3qdi0n6f7ssktksjm7@4ax.com:
>>>>>>> aggression and intimidation cannot be achieved without a willing
>>>> victim.
>>>
>>> This is easily the most sociopathic thing I've read in about six
>>> months.
>>
>> Stating a known fact isn't the same as endorsing a course of action.
>
>Any particular reason why you're defending a sociopath?
>
>Just curious.
|
| Show full article (0.67Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Atlas BuggedAtlas Bugged Date: Jan 22, 2008 12:58
"Daedalus" newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in message
news:e2dcp3d78328p0qn3qdi0n6f7ssktksjm7@4ax.com...> Part of this truth is realizing that AUK is no more sinister than its
> detractors allow it to be. Victims in the world of usenet are only
> victims of themselves, their insecurities, low self esteem, latent
> desire to be victims. AUKers are no more bullies than banjo players.
> They have their own insecurities, but aggression and intimidation
> cannot be achieved without a willing victim.
You are wrong, legally, factually, and morally.
90%% of the time you'd be correct, and AUK would be fine if it didn't engage
in the other 10%%.
But they do. It is actually not so shocking that you couldn't see how words
alone can be "aggression" in any meaningful sense.
I probably held that view once in my younger days. It has some logical
appeal.
But don't underestimate the ability of impotent, angry degenerates to wreak
unwilling havoc.
While you've obviously given it little thought, some have made it a career.
|
| Show full article (4.61Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: PerfectReignPerfectReign Date: Jan 22, 2008 13:04
Pisano wrote:
>>>> This is easily the most sociopathic thing I've read in about six
>>>> months.
>>>
>>> Stating a known fact isn't the same as endorsing a course of action.
>>
>>Any particular reason why you're defending a sociopath?
>>
>>Just curious.
>
>
> Who else would ever do such a thing but yet another sociopath?
Hey, my dad was a sociologist...
...oh wait....
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: art_deco_erfc_1024art_deco_erfc_1024 Date: Jan 22, 2008 14:09
On Jan 22, 3:44Â pm, gregvk wrote:
> Â It's a heartwarming story of
> predation by a lovely man who would fit right in here.)
I would like to fit right in his ass.
Art Deco
--
Official Art Deco Post
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Atlas BuggedAtlas Bugged Date: Jan 22, 2008 14:58
> gregvk wrote:
>> Daedalus newtko0ouks.biz> wrote in
>> news:e2dcp3d78328p0qn3qdi0n6f7ssktksjm7@4ax.com:
>>>>> aggression and intimidation cannot be achieved without a willing
>>> victim.
>>
>> This is easily the most sociopathic thing I've read in about six
>> months.
>
> Stating a known fact isn't the same as endorsing a course of action.
I don't even think it's sociopathic. The poster just doesn't understand how
words alone can ever be a crime.
I don't wish it on anyone, but perhaps an anonymous letter threatening to
kill the poster or their family will prove educational. Even if no action
ever follows, a real-deal crime has ocurred.
|
| Show full article (3.16Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: A [Temporary] DogA [Temporary] Dog Date: Jan 22, 2008 15:00
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:32:30 -0500, Daedalus newtko0ouks.biz>
painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
and shouted:
>
>Part of this truth is realizing that AUK is no more sinister than its
>detractors allow it to be.
I believe that is sig worthy and I mean that in a good way.
>Victims in the world of usenet are only
>victims of themselves, their insecurities, low self esteem, latent
>desire to be victims. AUKers are no more bullies than banjo players.
>They have their own insecurities, but aggression and intimidation
>cannot be achieved without a willing victim.
--
-A (Temporary) Dog, Prophet of the Copybook Headings
use the domain that is erols with tempdog as a name for email
"AUK is no more sinister than its detractors allow it to be. -Jade
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: miguelmiguel Date: Jan 22, 2008 15:42
"Atlas Bugged" wrote:
>"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote
>> gregvk wrote:
>>> Daedalus wrote:
>>>> aggression and intimidation cannot be achieved without a willing
>>>> victim.
>>> This is easily the most sociopathic thing I've read in about six
>>> months.
>> Stating a known fact isn't the same as endorsing a course of action.
>I don't even think it's sociopathic. The poster just doesn't understand how
>words alone can ever be a crime.
The "free speach" issue aside, I think what we have here is a failure
to communicate.
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: PisanoPisano Date: Jan 22, 2008 16:09
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:30:02 -0500, TheApostle
mailme.org> wrote:
I like your email addr. A bitch I didn't think of it first.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
RELATED THREADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
