> OllieNorthie@aol.com aol.com>
> : Follow the fuckin links!
> :

> :
> :
>
> Oh!!! ... Don't be worried!! ... I'm not! ... Because if
> the authors of unaccompanied links have the ability and
> history to say plenty with their naked links alone,
>

>On May 6, 8:47 am, herbertglaz...@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:

>>
>> Once Einstein saw the evidence that galaxies were moving away from
>> each other at an accelerating rate he gave up his "static"...

>> I'm interested, what do you do to ensure that your financial security
>> as you go through a transition?

>
> Freeload off daddy?

>

>> Hugs,
>> Vanessa
>>http://www.crossdresserheaven.com- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

> oldcoot sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>>On May 7, 9:41 am, "Painius" maol.com> wrote:

>>>
>>> Any field can be blocked, Jeff, once one knows how.
>>> But admittedly, it's much easier to overcome the
>>> spatial field by using lower-grade energies than by
>>> actually blocking it. The spatial/gravitational field is
>>> overcome by magnetism, the airfoil, rocketry, etc.
>>> But a way to block it will not be uncovered until its
>>> true nature is recognized and earnestly studied with
>>> the scientific method.

>>
>> These two sites were posted several times over the past year. The
>> first, from the European Space Agency, recounts how they are using a
>> superconducting disc to demonstrate gravitic effects. The effects are
>> seen only during the *acceleration* phase of the disc's spinup. And
>> what have we been saying all along about gravity occuring only in
>> association with acceleration? ...

>On May 6, 6:35 pm, "Painius" maol.com> wrote:

>>
>> Einstein's genius was in how he was able to get his
>> relativity theory into the bright limelight of controversy.
>> And he did this...

> On May 7, 7:09�pm, cmdr buzz corey mailcity.com>
> wrote:
>

>> Broadband service over power lines in Texas to shut down
>> May 7, 2008 (4:47p CDT)
>> By PETER SVENSSON �(AP Technology Writer)

>

>> NEW YORK - �Goodbye, broadband over power lines. We hardly knew you.

>

>> Once touted as a possible third option for home broadband that could
>> compete with phone and cable companies, the idea of providing Internet
>> service over power lines now looks like it has died in infancy.

>
> it is not doing well agreed sad realy since it does indeed sound like
> a neat idea �pity it does not work that well

> On Wed, 7 May 2008 16:29:56 -0700 (PDT), Lou hotmail.com>
> wrote in
> <6619f153-3ed1-41a5-ba1e-e19e1ef5b023@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>:
>

>>I'll go if Bertie goes.
>> Lou

>
>
> I'll bring the rope. :-)
>
>

>On May 6, 5:56 pm, "Painius" maol.com> wrote:

>>
>> ...acceptance of the CBB model would
>> swiftly lead to bridging the abyss between relativity and
>> quantum mechanics, and since this acceptance would
>> most likely be brought about by understanding (it)... i'd say you are
>> correct > that it will be a
>> very long time before science is able to free itself from
>> the quicksand of the VSP.
>>

>It's not even necessary to understand the CBB model. The simple FS
>models of Shifner, Lindner, Warren et al, which have no concept of the
>CBB, are quite sufficient. They recognize one Flow that ends up going
>into the atomic nucleus (e.g., Lindner's 'hadronic flow').