> On Wed, 14 May 2008 21:48:00 -0700 (PDT), skym bresnan.net>
> wrote in
> <34297d6f-ee61-4db1-ad87-4543d4611114@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>:
>

>>BtB is a loser who needs to get a life.

>
> Actually, it seems to be a shell-persona of multiple rogue anarchists,
> who revel in evil and destruction, to don similar to a bandit's mask.

>Actually, if one goes back and reads a little history to get a feeling
>for life in the early to mid 1700's in the U.S. it is not difficult to
>understand what the original framers of the Bill of rights meant.
>
>In that period the "Militia" in most areas was the adult men in the
>town and the "state" did not furnish clothing, arms or any other
>assistance. The directive for the people to keep weapons simply
>insured that the militia would be armed.
>
>If I remember correctly the English had a law that people must
>practice with the long bow, to ensure the supply of archers when the
>king called up his vassals and their men for war.

>It is interesting to note how strongly the 1st amendment is supported
>by the "media". and how poorly the 2nd.

>From 1945 the U.S. has gone from being the most respected country in
>the world to being the least - 63 years.....

>Where will the country be
>in 2045?

>What should be discussed is that certain groups are intent on
>depriving citizens in the U.S. of their fundamental rights (in this
>case to own a gun)

>>>>>>The basic problem is that the Government, or whoever you want to
>>>>>>designate as the Black Hats, are destroying what has been considered

>a

>>>>>>right since 1776, or there about.

>>...

>> There have been times, believe me, where we can get some
>> frustrated. If he isn't as bad as I made out, I apologize. But here's
>> an example of a reply from him about a year ago:
>>
>> Viperdoc writes:

>>> Hey Anthony you butthead- your basic premise is incorrect:

>
>
>
> Yep, MX was out of line with his facts -- but in the face of a
> personal attack like that ("you butthead"?), you've got to be fairly
> impressed with his calm response. Some of the so-called pilots here
> would have immediately defaulted to cuss words and insults.
>
> MX is a lot of things -- impolite isn't one of them.

>Matt Stawicki schrieb:
>

>> On Thu, 01 May 2008 18:19:20 +0200, Monika Krug
>> wrote:
>>

>>> Gunner schrieb:

>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:22:36 +0200, Monika...

>
> "Viperdoc" attglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:JqKWj.4542$nl7.4483@flpi146.ffdc.sbc.com...

>>I thought about a blender, but was worried that if I spilled one it
>>would ruin the seats, so now I just drink chilled vodka straight up.
>>
>>

>
> Remember, were talking about Anthony's panel here. You could always
> get up and walk over to bar to use the blender.

> On May 14, 10:17

>
> "james" martha.net> wrote in message
> news:pcqdnd8Vyqd-grbVnZ2dnUVZ_vninZ2d@giganews.com...

>> Every time I start my machine I get a CHUNK! sound and an error saying:
>>
>> RUNDLL
>> Error loading C:\WINDOWS\system32\hkqfbrkl.dll
>> The specified module could not be found.
>>
>> My machine is running not as good as it should. I believe. (It could be
>> my imagination)
>>

>
> Typo? A google search on that file name turns up absolutely zero
> responses.