> convicted neighbor Stephen Knight wrote:

> On 25 Apr 2007 19:36:24 -0700, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD/BJ/WTF/ Got
> down on his knees sucking a black vibrating dildo while shoving a
> cross of Jeebus up his ass, thorns and all, made this spittle:
>

>>>>Your hearing my voice here does not bode well just as your not
>>>>understanding what I have written does not bode well for your level of
>>>>cognitive functioning.

>

>>> It's 'you are', not 'your'.

>

>>Wrong.

>

>>Your embarrassing yourself like this is sad and simply shows that you
>>remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

>
> Wrong, Fuck Face. Just because two Wankers stood up for you and you
> slithered in thinking you're intellectual so you can take advantage
> (like with the suckers with your weight loss scam) of my 'apparent
> error to make yourself look good is bullshit. I checked. Your grammar ...

> On 2007-04-26 04:03:55 -0500, The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity
> hell.everyposehasits.corn> said:
>

>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:30:34 -0500, DaRkAnGeL did the cha-cha, and
>> screamed:

>>> On 2007-04-22 20:32:03 -0500, Plane Jayne said:

>>>> *DaRkAnGeL* was compelled to spew forth, on 04/23/2007 05:28 AM the
>>>> following:
>>>>

>>>>> <>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Henry has to. He is a She now ...

>>>>>
>>>>> Why do I see that as a worse proposition than before??

>>>>
>>>> Perhaps, Pumpkin, because he was butt ugly as a man. It would have
>>>> to be
>>>> worse to see him frocked up in his Mama's clothing and with her makeup
>>>> on. ...

> Take your CHILDISH SHITE OUT OF SOC.MEN, ASSWIPE!!!

> "The Original Demon Prince of Absurdity"
> hell.everyposehasits.corn> wrote in message
> news:pan.2007.04.26.08.53.56.715797@lucifer.the.great.beast.666.or.is.it.616...

>> On...

> deelilley@hotmail.com (Dee) wrote in
> news:1hx5lld.2mpxli14a9g3fN%%deelilley@hotmail.com:
>

>> wrote:
>>

>>> In article blackhelicopter.databasix.com>,
>>> Cujo DeSockpuppet insurgent.org> wrote:
>>>

>>>>You mispelled "PEAT", dammit. If the old fuckhead hasn't fed the
>>>>worms yet I'll bet PEAT is still asking the SD sheriff why they
>>>>haven't served me.

>>>
>>> He dismissed the suit. Why would the SD sheriff serve anybody for a
>>> case that's gone?

>>
>> That wouldn't stop PEAT from asking the sheriff.

>
> Edmo still thinks it's February of 2002.

> False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD thetruth.com> with yet
> another email address spewed his usual hate:
>

>>Your apparent continuing decline in cognitive functioning indicates
>>that more than just a dismantling of your memory core is taking place.

>
> This is either:
>
> 1) a quack making an unethical medical diagnosis over usenet
>
> or
>
> 2) a really lame insult that is hypocritical on the basis of Andy's
> "name calling simply means that..." line he posts over and over

> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:52:07 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
> catholic.org> wrote:
>

>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:

>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:08:11 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>> catholic.org> wrote:
>>>

>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:

>>>>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:55:12 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>>>> catholic.org> wrote:
>>>>>

>>>>>> §ñühw¤£f wrote:

>>>>>>> Henry Schmidt pinched out a steaming pile
>>>>>>> ofaioe.org>:
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> §ñühw¤£f wrote:

>>>>>>>>> Henry Schmidt pinched out a steaming pile
>>>>>>>>> of:
>>>>>>>>> ...

> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:49:47 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> gmail.com> wrote:
>

>> Lionel imagenoir.com> Thou folly-fallen who never yields us
>> kind answer. Thou conceited brassy bosom...

> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:40:47 -0500, Kali wrote:
>

>> In blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, Rhonda Lea Kirk
>> spunky@databasix.com said:

>>> "Kali" wrote in message

> [...]

>>>> What I see is more akin to an ex-girlfriend hanging around her
>>>> ex-boyfriends pub, where he's been a regular for years,

>>>
>>> Regular. Years.

>>
>> Yes. Since 2004.

>
> Yup.
>

>>> If your recollection of his posting history is as skewed as your
>>> recollection of recent history, I suppose all the facts in the world
>>> won't change it. I only care because you're using a very ...

>
> http://groups.google.co