|
|
 Up |
|
  |
Author: SLWatsonSLWatson Date: Jul 17, 2008 01:00
Re-launch.
Anyone else think that word is code for 'bullshit?'
|
| |
|
| | 312 Comments |
|
|
Author: KweegKweeg Date: Jul 17, 2008 01:15
> Re-launch.
>
> Anyone else think that word is code for 'bullshit?'
Not 'till I've *actually* seen it. Anything otherwise is pure uniformed
speculation.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
1,079,252,848.8 km/h, not just a good idea, it's the law.
"So say we all!"
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: SLWatsonSLWatson Date: Jul 17, 2008 01:46
::laughs:: Well, I don't need to see shit to be able to smell it in
the near vicinity and identify it as is.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Anim8rFSKAnim8rFSK Date: Jul 17, 2008 02:08
In article
c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>,
SLWatson gmail.com> wrote:
> Re-launch.
>
> Anyone else think that word is code for 'bullshit?'
And "too lazy to get it right"
--
Star Trek 09:
No Shat, No Show.
|
| |
| 23 Comments |
|
|
Author: KweegKweeg Date: Jul 17, 2008 02:52
> ::laughs:: Well, I don't need to see shit to be able to smell it in
> the near vicinity and identify it as is.
Indeed care to share you inside info.. or is it crystal ball, tarot, or an
Ouija board that allow you to make such broad statements?
The uniformed speculators said the same about Moore's BSG *before* they even
saw it too.
{{;-/>
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
1,079,252,848.8 km/h, not just a good idea, it's the law.
"So say we all!"
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: SLWatsonSLWatson Date: Jul 17, 2008 03:35
Ah, Kweeg. It's called being an individual capable of deductive
thought. :-D! And the ability to form opinions based upon information
already released. Most of the arguments that suggest this will be
crap have already been put forward here on this very newsgroup by
people, often eloquently. In the meantime, the arguments from the
other side of the fence have often been, "But you haven't seen it!"
See, it is not on me to prove myself. It's on JJ there. And in order
for me to give a chance to 're-launching' something I think is just
fine as is (namely, ST:TOS), he had better be so brilliant, so
informed, so GETTING it, so deeply and sincerely faithful to
Roddenberry's vision that he can practically be called the second
coming (that last bit is only a little facetious).
Since I highly doubt that the unoriginal little toad can pull that
off, I think that I'm pretty well entitled to roll my eyes at the idea
of him re-launching anything, especially something that endured long
before he was around. And especially since he can't even manage to
keep his own crap in line.
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Anim8rFSKAnim8rFSK Date: Jul 17, 2008 03:52
> Ah, Kweeg. It's called being an individual capable of deductive
> thought. :-D! And the ability to form opinions based upon information
> already released. Most of the arguments that suggest this...
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KweegKweeg Date: Jul 17, 2008 04:46
> Ah, Kweeg. It's called being an individual capable of deductive
> thought. :-D! And the ability to form opinions based upon information
> already released. Most of the arguments that suggest this will be
> crap have already been put forward here on this very newsgroup by
> people, often eloquently. In the meantime, the arguments from the
> other side of the fence have often been, "But you haven't seen it!"
>
> See, it is not on me to prove myself. It's on JJ there. And in order
> for me to give a chance to 're-launching' something I think is just
> fine as is (namely, ST:TOS), he had better be so brilliant, so
> informed, so GETTING it, so deeply and sincerely faithful to
> Roddenberry's vision that he can practically be called the second
> coming (that last bit is only a little facetious).
>
> Since I highly doubt that the unoriginal little toad can pull that
> off, I think that I'm pretty well entitled to roll my eyes at the idea
> of him re-launching anything, especially something that endured long
> before he was around. And especially since he can't even manage to ...
|
| Show full article (2.45Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Jul 17, 2008 04:59
Kweeg wrote:
> I prefer to base my opinions on fact
Me too. :)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: SLWatsonSLWatson Date: Jul 17, 2008 06:00
Kweeg: It's mostly what JJ himself has been saying, not the fanboys.
And most of us critics are looking at all the crap he's been saying
and that's where our big doubts come in. Like his proud proclamation
that he has A Trekkie (singular) on the writing team. What fan
wouldn't flail?
And citing that Nimoy likes it doesn't count. Of course he does; he
needs a paycheck too.
|
| |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
|
|
