alt.tv.clueless
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.tv.clueless only
 
Advanced search
June 2008
motuwethfrsasuw
      1 22
2345678 23
9101112131415 24
16171819202122 25
23242526272829 26
30       27
2008
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2008 2007 2006  
total
alt.tv.clueless Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Why I'm Voting Republican!         


Author: nickelshrink
Date: Jun 16, 2008 17:33

8~)) This one got a LOT of hits in less than a week!
Though it may have been around longer...?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiQJ9Xp0xxU

--
pax,
ruth

Save trees AND money! Buy used books!
http://stores.ebay.com/Noir-and-More-Books-and-Trains
no comments
  new Moveon ad         


Author: Peahen
Date: Jun 2, 2008 08:56

4 Comments
  Ping ellen Michigan decision         


Author: Peahen
Date: May 31, 2008 22:10

Ellen, if you visit here anymore, what's your reaction to the Michigan
delegate split?
no comments
  Reverend problems and the media         


Author: FurPaw
Date: May 30, 2008 05:22

I'm just downright disgusted. First Wright, then Hagee and
Parsley, and now Pfleuger.

Clearly Jim Jones's grape koolade wasn't enough of a cautionary
tale about entering the ministry/priesthood!

What really disgusts me is the media play that these jokers are
getting. Yesterday MSNBC and CNN were reporting about how Fox
News kept showing that disgusting video of Pfleuger, as a guest
pastor at Obama's church, making fun of HRC, with the choir(?)
laughing their fool heads off in the background. Yes, reporting
and reporting and reporting, each of them showing it over and
over and over as they complained about how Fox was giving the
story legs.

I flipped on Morning Joe this morning, and golly gee, what were
they talking about? Not McClelland's book, not the high rate of
suicides in the army, not how in the hell the Florida/Michigan
problem is going to be solved, not about the tornadoes that have
been ravaging the midwest... no, it was Father Pfartpface again.

The Democrats don't need this kind of "help" from the "liberal"
network.
Show full article (1.19Kb)
1 Comment
  McClellan book         


Author: Peahen
Date: May 28, 2008 13:07

Not that I like Scottie, but I do love the fact that the book's come out.
3 Comments
  ONLY in America!!!         


Author: FurPaw
Date: May 24, 2008 09:22

http://www.newsweek.com/id/138347

Do you suppose they'll crucify Mickey?

FurPaw
--
The plural of anecdote is not proof.

To reply, unleash the dog.
2 Comments
  very quiet here         


Author: Peahen
Date: May 23, 2008 19:32

Does anybody visit anymore?
5 Comments
  Protect yourself against Operation Sudden Fall         


Author: Rosalind.Kalmer
Date: May 9, 2008 21:33

Law enforcement is now intercepting text messages,
as proven by Operation Sudden Fall in San Diego.

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/states/newsrel/sd050608.html
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080506-1338-bn06sdsu2.html

Don't let your personal SMS/text messages fall into
the wrong hands. Encrypt your messages with one
of these:

http://www.CryptoSMS.org
http://www.CryptoSMS.com
http://www.FortressMail.net/fortress_sms.htm
http://www.Cop2p.com/encrypted_sms.html

Be Safe, Be Encrypted, Fuck the Police!!

--
Many variants will be partial implicit papers.
no comments
  defend against Operation Sudden Fall         


Author: Samantha.Orduna
Date: May 9, 2008 17:47

Law enforcement is now intercepting text messages,
as proven by Operation Sudden Fall in San Diego.

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/states/newsrel/sd050608.html
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080506-1338-bn06sdsu2.html

Don't let your personal SMS/text messages fall into
the wrong hands. Encrypt your messages with one
of these:

http://www.CryptoSMS.org
http://www.CryptoSMS.com
http://www.FortressMail.net/fortress_sms.htm
http://www.Cop2p.com/encrypted_sms.html

Be Safe, Be Encrypted, Fuck the Police!!

--
Maify spoils the reminder in spite of hers and permanently attacks.
no comments
  Anyone here? Below the belt...         


Author: FurPaw
Date: Apr 23, 2008 15:48

Yesterday Thom Hartmann opined that he has observed several
instances of Clinton attacking Obama "below the belt," he has not
heard of him doing likewise to her. He was defining "below the
belt" as an attack that does damage not only to the candidate but
also to the party's ability to win the election.

What do you think?

FurPaw
--
The plural of anecdote is not proof.

To reply, unleash the dogs
no comments
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9