|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: James RobinsonJames Robinson Date: May 12, 2008 10:10
Archie's voice coach was interviewed on a Utah radio station this AM:
http://images.radcity.net/6737/2655436.mp3
In short, his take on the subject:
- Jeff was never allowed "backstage", nor were other contestant's friends
or relatives.
- The new restriction is that Jeff is no longer allowed in the arranging
sessions, since none of the other contestants...
|
| Show full article (1.03Kb) |
|
| | 11 Comments |
|
|
Author: JXSternJXStern Date: May 12, 2008 10:47
I hope the Supreme Court steps in and names this year's winner,
obviously no lesser authority can solve these complex and serious
problems.
J.
On 12 May 2008 17:10:52 GMT, James Robinson 212.com> wrote:
|
| Show full article (1.27Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: James RobinsonJames Robinson Date: May 12, 2008 10:52
> I hope the Supreme Court steps in and names this year's winner,
> obviously no lesser authority can solve these complex and serious
> problems.
It would be a 5/4 split decision, along partisan lines.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: X-FactorX-Factor Date: May 12, 2008 10:55
On 12 May 2008 17:52:38 GMT, James Robinson 212.com> wrote:
>JXStern gte.net> wrote:
>>> I hope the Supreme Court steps in and names this year's winner,
>> obviously no lesser authority can solve these complex and serious
>> problems.
>
>It would be a 5/4 split decision, along partisan lines.
If you are referring to Bush v Gore, that decision was 7/2.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: James RobinsonJames Robinson Date: May 12, 2008 11:08
X-Factor wrote:
> James Robinson 212.com> wrote:
> >> JXStern gte.net> wrote:
>>>>> I hope the Supreme Court steps in and names this year's winner,
>>> obviously no lesser authority can solve these complex and serious
>>> problems.
>>
>> It would be a 5/4 split decision, along partisan lines.
>
> If you are referring to Bush v Gore, that decision was 7/2.
No, the general trend over the last couple of years has been 5/4 on many
decisions, which on the surface would appear odd, since all the justices
claim to be interpreting the strict letter of the law. They are all very
bright, yet when they make their interpretations, they seem to be very
split in their views. It doesn't make the court or their decisions look
that strong, and I think it somewhat taints their history.
|
| Show full article (1.19Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: DianneYMeDianneYMe Date: May 12, 2008 11:18
James Robinson wrote:
> Archie's voice coach was interviewed on a Utah radio station this AM:
>
> http://images.radcity.net/6737/2655436.mp3
>
> In short, his take on the subject:
>
> - Jeff was never allowed "backstage", nor were other contestant's friends
> or relatives.
> - The new restriction is that Jeff is no longer allowed in the arranging
> sessions, since none of the other contestants have that kind of support,
> and the producers were worried about what might be considered an unfair
> advantage.
> - Jeff still attends any other functions, like photoshoots, and is still
> David's main musical advisor, outside of the AI team.
> - The lyrics were changed to avoid the repetitive "Stand by me" lyrics in
> the song. The AI musical director and voice coach encouraged him to make
> the change, after they heard it, since it made the presentation better.
> - AI staff and producers heard the changed lyrics perhaps 4 or 5 times,
> including at the dress rehearsal, and never questioned them. ...
|
| Show full article (1.39Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: MickeyMickey Date: May 12, 2008 11:52
James Robinson wrote:
> X-Factor wrote:
>
>> James Robinson 212.com> wrote:
>>>>> JXStern gte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> I hope the Supreme Court steps in and names this year's winner,
>>>> obviously no lesser authority can solve these complex and serious
>>>> problems.
>>> It would be a 5/4 split decision, along partisan lines.
>> If you are referring to Bush v Gore, that decision was 7/2.
>
> No, the general trend over the last couple of years has been 5/4 on many
> decisions, which on the surface would appear odd, since all the justices
> claim to be interpreting the strict letter of the law.
Actually, Breyer (among others) nearly claim the contrary. The whole
"living constitution" theory is a fig leaf for rewriting according to
what one feels about the law.
|
| Show full article (1.61Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: starcadestarcade Date: May 12, 2008 11:57
On May 12, 10:47Â am, JXStern gte.net> wrote:> I hope the Supreme Court steps in and names this year's winner,
> obviously no lesser authority can solve these complex and serious
> problems.
Don't be so sarcastic.
I firmly believe that, by the end of this season, there will be
several legal teams poring over the contracts, seeking remedies for
some of the stuff which occurred.
Mike
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Peter LawrencePeter Lawrence Date: May 12, 2008 12:10
Mickey wrote:
>
> Scalia, surprisingly enough, has often sided with the nominally left
> side of the court, notably in cases concerning free speech and freedom
> from illegal search and seizure.
Which should be expected from a true hard-right conservative.
The very liberal and the very conservative share a common disdain for
overzealous police powers.
- Peter
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Bob RuddBob Rudd Date: May 12, 2008 15:18
In article 4ax.com>,
JXSternChangeX2R@gte.net says...> I hope the Supreme Court steps in and names this year's winner,
> obviously no lesser authority can solve these complex and serious
> problems.
>
> J.
Hehehehe, GREAT one J.!
5-4 split with Archuleta winning due to Ginsburg thinking she was voting
for Obama.
--
I hope we can all be good neighbors online!
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
