Read it and weep, Rudd:

http://cbs5.com/local/gay.marriage.ruling.2.724840.html

- greg

On May 15, 11:22 am, SLGreg yahoo.com> wrote:

I was wondering what took them so long. Slackers.

On May 15, 12:22�pm, SLGreg yahoo.com> wrote:

The California court has registered approval to a type of relationship
that has destroyed lives.

Magus wrote:

And how many lives have been destroyed by a "straight" type of relationship?

There is nothing you can say about gay relationships that can't also be
applied to heterosexual relationships.

Frankly, there are a lot bigger problems in this world than who is
marrying who, and people need to get their noses out of other peoples'
bedrooms.

On May 15, 9:22 am, SLGreg yahoo.com> wrote:

Excellent! About time. Maybe my cousin Kenny can finally eventually
get married; they've only been together for OVER 40 YEARS.

Love is love, and everyone regardless of sexual orientation deserves
the right to be protected by our country's laws and have their
partners protected as well. We're talking medical care and insurance,
the right to be by their sick or dying partner's hospital bedside,
children's educations and health care as many adopt, and if their
partner dies before them the right of any spouse to the financial
security awarded to widows and widowers.

As one of my closest friends would say, there's nothing queer about
loving another human being.

On May 15, 10:38 am, Magus yahoo.com> wrote:

The only lives it's destroyed are the ones who've been the victims of
hatred and discrimination by people like you.

On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:38:53 -0700 (PDT), Magus
yahoo.com> wrote:

Yep. Just look what it did to Britney Spears and Nicole Brown
Simpson!

Well, I guess that is one way to define marriage, if the marriage is
bad.

On May 15, 1:12 pm, RavenLord yahoo.com> wrote:

Hey - why buy the cow?

daveparks wrote:

So you can sell the milk to others.

Wait...That is where you were going with this, wasn't it?