>
> In the latest episode of Pirate Master the 'triad' of male power decided

> stop sharing three money equally amongst the winners. Obviously, money is
> good both in terms of raw value and because the 'pardon' has made it a
> necessary part of the game to have more money that the 'other guy'.
> However, short changing the other winners is bound to make them all mad.
>
> If I had been in charge, my solution would have been to give everyone

> shares EXCEPT I would taken ALL of Joy's share and distributed that

> among the 'Triad'. Tell everyone that she got nothing because she

> so poorly in the challenge and didn't deserve to be on the boat any

> Then, black spot her. In that way, only one person would be mad at the
> Captain (and officers) instead of everyone while the captain and officers ...

> In the latest episode of Pirate Master the 'triad' of male power decided to
> stop sharing three money equally amongst the winners. Obviously, money is
> good both in terms of raw value and because the 'pardon' has made it a
> necessary part of the game to have more money that the 'other guy'.
> However, short changing the other winners is bound to make them all mad.
>
> If I had been in charge, my solution would have been to give everyone equal
> shares EXCEPT I would taken ALL of Joy's share and distributed that 'extra'
> among the 'Triad'. Tell everyone that she got nothing because she performed
> so poorly in the challenge and didn't deserve to be on the boat any longer.
> Then, black spot her. In that way, only one person would be mad at the
> Captain (and...

> Obveeus wrote:

>> In the latest episode of Pirate Master the 'triad' of male power decided
>> to stop sharing three money equally amongst the winners. Obviously,
>> money is good both in terms of raw value and because the 'pardon' has
>> made it a necessary part of the game to have more money that the 'other
>> guy'. However, short changing the other winners is bound to make them all
>> mad.
>>
>> If I had been in charge, my solution would have been to give everyone
>> equal shares EXCEPT I would taken ALL of Joy's share and distributed
>> that 'extra' among the 'Triad'. Tell everyone that she got nothing
>> because she performed so poorly in the challenge and didn't deserve to be
>> on the boat any longer. Then, black spot her. In that way, only one
>> person would be mad at the Captain (and officers) instead of everyone
>> while the captain and officers would still get extra loot..

>
> How come nobody considers a mutiny? Jo-Don was on the right track last
> night. They need to break that 3 way triad as you say. Other than needing ...

> Obveeus wrote:

>> In the latest episode of Pirate Master the 'triad' of male power decided to
>> stop sharing three money equally amongst the winners. Obviously, money is
>> good both in terms of raw value and because the 'pardon' has made it a
>> necessary part of the game to have more money that the 'other guy'.
>> However, short changing the other winners is bound to make them all mad.
>>
>> If I had been in charge, my solution would have been to give everyone equal
>> shares EXCEPT I would taken ALL of Joy's share and distributed that 'extra'
>> among the 'Triad'. Tell everyone that she got nothing because she performed
>> so poorly in the challenge and didn't deserve to be on the boat any longer.
>> Then, black spot her. In that way, only one person would be mad at the
>> Captain (and officers) instead of everyone while the captain and officers
>> would still get extra loot..
>>
>>

>
> How come nobody considers a mutiny? Jo-Don was on the right track last
> night. They need to break that 3 way triad as you say. Other than ...

> Same with casting someone adrift, there is a "fairness" to it in that
> it gives the person cast off some chance/hope.

>How come nobody considers a mutiny? Jo-Don was on the right track last
>night. They need to break that 3 way triad as you say. Other than
>needing a majority what is the give? If someone slaps down a mutiny card
>and they are wrong do they walk the plank?
>
>I wish they would walk the plank but I guess being cast adrift is a
>better camera angle.

> On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 10:28:08 -0700, Sonoran Dude
> comcast.remove.net> wrote:
>

>>How come nobody considers a mutiny? Jo-Don was on the right track last
>>night. They need to break that 3 way triad as you say. Other than
>>needing a majority what is the give? If someone slaps down a mutiny card
>>and they are wrong do they walk the plank?
>>
>>I wish they would walk the plank but I guess being cast adrift is a
>>better camera angle.

>
> It's very easy - next time the red crew wins a challenge the new
> captain puts the spot on all three of them. There isn't a snowflake's
> chance in hell they could successfully mount a mutiny under these
> circumstances.

> "Michael Black" wrote:

>> Same with casting someone adrift, there is a "fairness" to it in that
>> it gives the person cast off some chance/hope.

>
> Especially if they can find two sea turtles. ;-)
>
> On Pirate Master, they don't actually need to mutiny, though. If Joy had
> just sat down and said 'I do not feel like going after the treasure', the
> Captain and Officers would have been replaced.
>
>
>
>