> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:20:40 GMT, "Sheila" telus.net> wrote:
>

>>LOL! Only morons top post??! I take it you've never used outlook. And now
>>you are getting your knickers in a knot over that fact that someone top
>>posts?? (which btw actually means people don't have to scroll all the way
>>down to read someone's post. which is a good thing. Unless they are like
>>you and have way too much free time on their hands.)

>
> No, I've never used Outlook and will admit that I'm not at all
> familiar with it. I find it hard to believe, though, that it won't
> allow you to bottom post. If that is indeed the case then I apologize
> to you but am left wondering why you (or anyone) would use it. Top
> posting is annoying to the reader, because they first have to scroll
> down to read the post to which you're responding to and then come back
> up to read your response. If you check out other replies to postings
> you'll find that well over 90%% bottom post. There IS a reason they do
> so, regardless of how you feel about me personally. Take care....

>>
>>You may want to try decaf sweetie.
>>
>> wrote in message
>>news:v41bv2pr1tdv9vrh5vter5ioiohukbc6rh@4ax.com...

>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:47:06 GMT, "Sheila" telus.net> wrote:
>>>

>>>>wow, you have a lot of free time on hour hands.
>>>>
>>>>newsflash, Romber helped create the anti-Romber sentiment with their
>>>>over-the-top smugness and their ridiculous egos. Some people like to watch
>>>>obnoxious people such as them, most do not. You seem to have issues that
>>>>go
>>>>far beyond this discussion, so we'll just leave you to your little
>>>>snit-fit.

>>>
>>> I have a lot of free time on MY hands? This is (I believe) my 4th post
>>> to this group and you have how many? I'm sorry if you took offense at
>>> the mere mention of the fact that your hatred of Rob and Amber isn't
>>> the main focus point for the majority in the group but you just need
>>> to get over it, sweetheart. Oh, and btw, only morons and aholes top
>>> post.

>>>>
>>>> wrote in message
>>>>news:ahs9v2hkkld6a45k8g0hs2p2ujmtqpo07r@4ax.com...

>>>>>

>>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:k5m9v2h4qetfonkfa5oev9or93q06vftlj@4ax.com...

>>>>>>> ...is that maybe now all the moronic anti-Romber posts will die down
>>>>>>> and the group can get back to more relevant and pertinent posts that
>>>>>>> actually deal WITH THE SHOW! Je

>>>>>>sus! You people are more giddy than

>>>>>>> schoolchildren on Christmas morning! Do you really have so little
>>>>>>> going on in your lives that you have to invest so much of yourselves
>>>>>>> in such a negative manner?

>>>>>
>>>>> To which Sheila replied:
>>>>>
>>>>> well now, I guess we all just learned that from watching Romber.

>>>>>>
>>>>>>and I'm not quite sure how writing about Romber has nothing to do with
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>show.... but I guess in your mind only pro-Romber posts that praise
>>>>>>their
>>>>>>rudeness, meglomania and overall nastiness are allowed.

>>>>>
>>>>> Well I certainly don't know how you came to THAT conclusion because
>>>>> it's not even close to what I wrote or implied. Just seems to me that
>>>>> there's a lot of anger in an awful lot of people that post here
>>>>> towards people who've done them no personal harm. Rob and Amber? Mirna
>>>>> and Charla? Who cares? Do you sit down to watch a sporting event
>>>>> because you hate a team so passionately that you want to see them
>>>>> lose? Maybe it's typical of folks in this group but I've got to tell
>>>>> you - it's not normal behavior. Most people (normal folk) watch
>>>>> because they're rooting FOR a certain team (or individual). The
>>>>> anti-Romber posts here seem to come from people who don't care WHO
>>>>> wins, just as long as it's not them. So my post was just meant to
>>>>> express hope that, with their loss, the group can get over SO many
>>>>> posts about them. I guarantee you, however, that that won't happen
>>>>> anytime soon. First we'll have to hear about their appearance on Regis
>>>>> and Kelly (and the inevitable 'Kelly loves them!' comments) followed
>>>>> by posts commenting on every aspect (no matter how minor) of their
>>>>> comings, goings, and public comments. I just don't understand the
>>>>> seeming infatuation of this couple by people who constantly continue
>>>>> to express negative comments toward them. Sorry if I seem to be
>>>>> praising them, but if that's the case I want to assure you that it's
>>>>> all in your mind.....

>>>>>>

>>>>

>>