|
|
 Up |
  |
Author: JohnJohn
Date: Jan 14, 2007 18:01
Simpson is a negro. The jurors were negros. End of story.
"Uncle Clover" SpamMeNot.com> wrote in message
news:klilq2tk1t79dn0ildoqup2uo2398ln16t@4ax.com...> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:19:58 GMT, "AusWendy" notlikely.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.61Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: JohnJohn
Date: Jan 14, 2007 17:56
To think of the HELL he put his parents through when all the selfish little
bastard had to do was send a letter or make a phone call saying he was ok.
What a dumbass kid. He doesn't deserve a medal - he deserves the whooping
of his life...............
|
| |
|
6 Comments |
|
|
Author: Matthew T. RussottoMatthew T. Russotto
Date: Jan 14, 2007 17:16
In article goodwill.larseighner.com>,
Lars Eighner larseighner.com> wrote:>In our last episode,
> speakeasy.net>,
>the lovely and talented Matthew T. Russotto
>broadcast on alt.true-crime:
>>> In article goodwill.larseighner.com>,
>> Lars Eighner larseighner.com> wrote:>>>
>>>It is a crime to drive drunk. It is no crime to "might" drive drunk.
>>>How exactly are you being punished for "might" drive drunk?
>
>> Thanks to MADD laws, if you're found sleeping it off in the back seat
>> of your car, you're guilty of drunk driving. If you're found sleeping
>> it off in an inoperable car (for instance, one with no engine), you're
>> guilty of drunk driving. If you're found over the 0.08 limit in a
>> Virginia or Texas bar, you're guilty of public intoxication. If
>> you blow below the legal limit in PA, they can linearly extrapolate your BAC
>> backwards to the time of arrest and convict you anyway. ...
|
| Show full article (1.75Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: bb
Date: Jan 14, 2007 17:14
nimue wrote:
> b wrote:
>
> snip
>>
>> in the stayner case.... the predator had specifically researched
>> families
>
> Really? How did he do that in those pre-internet days?
>
>> and gone after a boy who came from an unhappy home and
> was
>> abused
>
> Huh? I never heard that Steven Staynor was abused by his real parents.
> Where did you hear that? Please provide a link.
>
>> - so he knew he could be controlled - think - he told stayner
>> that his parents didn't want him back and stayner believed it - a
>> child from a happy home would have been tough to sell that line.... ...
|
| Show full article (3.33Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: _News Wire__News Wire_
Date: Jan 14, 2007 17:11
Michael Snyder wrote:
> "Only" 18 years? The average sentence for an American woman
> who murders her husband is SIX years.
So how many of these female soldiers killed their husbands, moron?
Why not cite the average sentence for a Nigga who murders a Whitey ?
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Matthew T. RussottoMatthew T. Russotto
Date: Jan 14, 2007 17:05
In article news2.newsguy.com>,
Nate Nagel flycast.net> wrote:>
>That is correct, I have the Constitutional right to travel freely, and
>since I have fulfilled all legal requirements to operate a motor vehicle
>the state or states have no right to deprive me of my right to drive.
Ahh, but the Robed 9 just let stand an appeals court decision which
says you have no right to any _particular_ mode of travel (the Gilmore
decision concerning secret airline security directives). So you can
travel, but the state can put arbitrary and even secret restrictions on any
particular mode of travel you can come up with.
Rather vitiates the Fourth Amendment in my opinion, but no one asked.
--
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.
|
| |
|
2 Comments |
|
|
Author: Morton DavisMorton Davis
Date: Jan 14, 2007 17:04
>
> Morton Davis wrote:
>>> According to my calculations, there are at least 4 governors on my
>>> side. Then have made it unequivocally clear where they stand, in
recent
>>> announcements.
>>>
>>> - Deval Patrick (Massachusetts)
>>> - Rick Perry (Texas)
>>> - Jebb Bush's successor (Florida)
>>> - Arnold Schwarzenegger (California)
>>>
>>> Their states are some of the most influential in the land (as
>>> California goes, so does the nation?), not to mention their size or
>>> number of inhabitants (MA is big in intelligence, though).
>>> ...
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: Lars EighnerLars Eighner
Date: Jan 14, 2007 16:57
In our last episode,
speakeasy.net>,
the lovely and talented Matthew T. Russotto
broadcast on alt.true-crime:
> In article goodwill.larseighner.com>,
> Lars Eighner larseighner.com> wrote:>>
>>It is a crime to drive drunk. It is no crime to "might" drive drunk.
>>How exactly are you being punished for "might" drive drunk?
> Thanks to MADD laws, if you're found sleeping it off in the back seat
> of your car, you're guilty of drunk driving. If you're found sleeping
> it off in an inoperable car (for instance, one with no engine), you're
> guilty of drunk driving. If you're found over the 0.08 limit in a
> Virginia or Texas bar, you're guilty of public intoxication. If
> you blow below the legal limit in PA, they can linearly extrapolate your BAC
> backwards to the time of arrest and convict you anyway.
And the problem with that would be?
|
| Show full article (1.13Kb) |
|
3 Comments |
|
|
Author: bb
Date: Jan 14, 2007 16:52
nimue wrote:
> b wrote:
>
> snip
>>
>> in the stayner case.... the predator had specifically researched
>> families
>
> Really? How did he do that in those pre-internet days?
like anyone else did - look up families ask neighbours
>
>> and gone after a boy who came from an unhappy home and
> was
>> abused
>
> Huh? I never heard that Steven Staynor was abused by his real parents.
> Where did you hear that? Please provide a link.
|
| Show full article (5.95Kb) |
|
no comments
|
|
|
Author: SquidInkSquidInk
Date: Jan 14, 2007 16:42
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 11:44:02 -0800, "SquidInk" noon.com>
> wrote:> Oh thank you thank you thank you. I needed a good laugh. Now I wish
> I could find the rerun on tv.
|
| |
|
no comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
