Re: Top 15 Misconceptions About Evolution
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.talk.creationism only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Top 15 Misconceptions About Evolution         

Group: alt.talk.creationism · Group Profile
Author: M.M. Martinson
Date: Feb 23, 2008 21:14

"Bob T." synapse-cs.com> wrote in message
news:c1ea47d0-f5df-48c4-87c5-471d5654c637@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 23, 7:28 pm, Budikka666 netscape.net> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 6:54 am, n...@buffy.sighup.org.uk wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> In talk.atheism adman <72...@hottmail.et> wrote:
>
>>> "Budikka666" netscape.net> wrote in message
>>>news:c4f09f9a-540e-4367-b8f2-74304d0a1bc1@j28g2000hsj.googlegroups.com...
>>> |http://listverse.com/science/top-15-misconceptions-about-evolution/
>>> |
>>> | I'm not sure I agree that this list is the top 15. The author
>>> doesn't
>>> | explain how they were arrived at,
>
>>> ROFLing! Cannot tell us how they were arrived at, BUT ITS TRUE RIGHT?
>
>> You do know the difference between "could not" and "did not" don't you?
>
>> In fact, if anybody reads to the end you will discover that the list is
>> inspired the "Berkeley, Evolution 101 FAQ" together with a handy link.
>> Following the link we discover that the entire thing was written by
>> actual
>> scientists using a government grant.
>
>> --
>> Atheism: godless, not believing in the existence of gods.
>> Atheist: one who denies or disbelieves in the existence of gods.
>> 2001 Census: 1 in 7 people in the UK is a declared atheist.
>> Gods I don't believe in:http://anya.sighup.org.uk/gods.html
>
> "adman" is Jabriol. He's a laughably transparent LIAR, a pitiful
> coward, a monumental (with the emphasis on mental) hypocrite and a
> professional fraud. He's delighted to poke his vacuous brand of "fun"
> at 150 years of solid science supporting the Theory of Evolution - the
> only scientific theory which explains the *fact* of evolution - but if
> you ask him for even one single peer-reviewed paper supporting his
> assertions, he'll run.

Do you have some reason for believing this? To me, they seem like
very different kooks. For example, Jabriol always seems to break down
and call his debate opponents "Carol", and I don't think adman has
ever done this.

Jabriol is not "adman." You are correct. Adman doesn't appear to be a
dangerous sociopath, just a deluded theist.
>
> That's all you need to know about Jabriol.

Jabriol also has a vicousness about him that I don't detect in adman.
I've also seen adman laugh at a joke from time to time, and even admit
that somebody who disagrees with him has made a good point. Unless
you have a technical reason for believing they are the same person, I
think you are mistaken.

Jabriol is a vicious slanderer and homicidal sociopath, adman is not, but
both profess to be Christians.

- Bob T.
>
> Budikka- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!