Law enforcement is now intercepting text messages,
as proven by Operation Sudden Fall in San Diego.

http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/states/newsrel/sd050608.html
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080506-1338-bn06sdsu2.html

Don't let your personal SMS/text messages fall into
the wrong hands. Encrypt your messages with one
of these:

http://www.CryptoSMS.org
http://www.CryptoSMS.com
http://www.FortressMail.net/fortress_sms.htm
http://www.Cop2p.com/encrypted_sms.html

Be Safe, Be Encrypted, Fuck the Police!!

Insider Reveals Secret Traffic Arbitrage Tactics Making Over $9,547 a Day

Why Complain About Rising Adwords and Pay Per Click Costs When They Can Make
You Rich Instead? Discover the Astonishing traffic story That Has Been Kept
Secret Until Now...

http://www.mfawn.com/payloadrb.html

w1jY&DI^(d

MI5 Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website

The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the MI5
Persecution website describing it as an "excellent site". The webpages
describe in detail the nature of my persecution since 1990 by what are
believed to be elements of the UK security service.

(snip image)

You are encouraged to read the web pages which include

o a FAQ section outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods
of harassment through the media, people at work and among the general public
o an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and
workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to me
o factual descriptions of the state security agencies involved
o scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state security agencies involved
o posts which have been made to netnews over the last three years on this topic

12897

Why do you think MI5 are responsible?

The question of who is ultimately responsible for this eight-year
harassment is one which is very difficult to answer, as the persecutors
have never clearly made their identities known to the persecutee. However,
I believe I am correct in attributing the continuing victimisation to
elements of the British Security Service MI5, and in this article, I will
try to explain the reasons for this belief.

The British internet magazine ".net" featured my website on page 17 of
their March 1998 issue (number 42). Their review kindly describes it as an
"excellent site" and gives some details of what the net surfer will find
there. Should you wish to reply to this article you can do so;

"When did you first suspect MI5 were responsible?"

Over Easter 1995 I went to see a local solicitor in London with a view to
talking to the police about the harassment. Soon afterwards I did go to my
local police station in Clapham and spoke to an officer there. The
solicitor made a comment which suggested to me that the persecution I had
been experiencing may have been organised by an intelligence service.

MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True?

If you have the patience to read these articles you will be struck by how
apparently fantastic the claims being put forward are. You may ask
yourself why such seemingly nonsensical assertions are made. This matter
has been discussed on the Internets UK-local newsgroups for three years
now, and the denizens of the uk.misc newsgroup (the so-called
"miscreants") have come up with a number of theories to explain these
posts; it has been variously suggested that they are a troll (an
artificial creation for the amusement of its author), that they are made
by MI5 themselves with the purpose of discrediting other conspiracy
theories, and that the poster is mentally ill and the articles are
symptomatic of the illness (the view held by most miscreants).

Are these claims the product of mental illness, or is that just a cover?

441712192872 nyyyyyYnnnnnYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYnyyynyynnynyynyyyyy
441712192873 yyyyyyYyyyyyyNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712192879 yyyyyyYnyyyyyYYYYYEYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynyny
441712192905 yyyyyyYyyyynnYYYYNNNNNYYNYEYynyyynyyyyyyynyyyyy
441712192912 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYEYYEEYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyyyyyyynyyyy
441712192921 nyyyyyYyynyynEYYYYYYYYYEEYNYynnnnnynnynynyyyyyy
441712192949 yyyyyyYyyynynYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyynn
441712192957 yyyyyyYyyyyynYYYEYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712192965 ynyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYNYYYYYyynynyyynynyyyyyyyy
441712192969 ynnnnnYnnyyyyYNEEYYNYNEYEYNYnnnynyyyynNnyynnyny
441712192991 ynnyyyYyyyyynYYEEYYYYYYYEYYYynyyyynynnnEnnnnnnB
441712193000 nnynynNynnnnnNNNNYNNNNNNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712193010 yyyyyyYyynynyNYYEYEYYYYEYYNYyyynnnnyynNnynnnyny
441712193047 yyyyyyYynyyyyYYYYYYEYYYYYYYEyyyynyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193085 yyyyyyNyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712193373 yyyyyyEyyyyyyYYYYYYYYYYYYYEYyyyyynyyynnYnnnnnnB
441712193382 yyyyyyYyyyynyYYEYYYYYYYYEYEYnnnyynnyyyyyynnnyy
441712193398 yyyyyyYyyyyyyYYYYYYEYYYEYYYYyyyyyyynyyyyyyynyyy
441712193434 nyyyyyYyynyyyYYYYYEYNYYYYYYYynyyynnnyyyyyyyynyy
441712193496 ynyyyyYnnnynnNYEYNYEYYYYYYYEyyyynnnnnnyynnyyyyy ...

Faxes Sent to British Parliament logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 14,480 faxes to the British Parliament
in Westminster, of which 9,138 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 5,342 were sent via fax-modem direct from
my computer. The actual figure is obviously much higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to
be deleted from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.

441712190076 nnnnnynnEnnnnnnYYNNYYYYNENNNNNynynnnnnnnnnNnnnnnnnn
441712190179 yyyynnyyyYnyyyyynYYYNYYYYYYEYEEEyyyyyyynyyyynyyyyy
441712190189 yyynyyyyyYyyyyyyyYYYEYYYYYYYYYYYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441712190243...

Faxes Sent to British Media logs

During the 1998-2000 period my records indicate that I sent at least 6,137 faxes to the British media,
of which 5,775 went via TPC's email-to-fax service and 362 were sent via fax-modem direct from my computer.
The actual figure is obviously higher since, for most of this period, whenever a recipient asked to be deleted
from my mailing list, I totally wiped all entries including that from the logfile.

In the records "Y" indicates successful transmission from fax-modem, "N" indicates failed transmission from fax-modem.
"E" indicates an error occurred while transmitting via fax-modem and a fax may have been only partly transmitted.
"y" and "n" indicate success or failure via TPC.

In April 2000 I changed the method of operation by recording "R" when a recipient requested removal, rather than
wiping their details from my mailing list and records; and keeping "B" records for when TPC actioned a ban on a
recipient's fax-number, but the recipient did not write to ask me to cease faxing. The purpose of these changes
was to keep more accurate and complete records, but the intention was thwarted by the police complaint.
Also in April 2000, I added some further fax numbers to my media mailing list and records, which is why some of the
faxnumbers below have only a single entry, and some indeed have none.

441132420652 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441132439387 yyyyyYyyynyyyyyyyy
441132445107 yyyyyYyyyyyynyyyyyy
441132455139 n
441132460037 yyyyyYyyyyyyyyyyyyy
441132461105 yyyyyYyyynyyynnnnnn
441132836586 yyyyyYynyyyyyyyyyyy...

Private Eye, 23 Oct 1992

Certainty level: 25%%

I'm not really sure whether this cover was intended to get at me,
or whether it was re-interpreted after publication to be about me.
This issue of Private Eye came out in October 1992, by which time I had
been under severe continuous pressure at work and from the general
population in Oxford for many months. It had John Major saying to his
wife, "Come back, Norma!" under the title "Major's support lowest ever".

There's a story behind this. In late October I was in the local pub
(the Rose and Crown, nice traditional name eh) with two people from
work, Simon and Phil. Phil had with him a copy of the current Private
Eye. These are both "nice people" and on my side, I hasten to add.
Simon pointed out the message on the magazine's cover to Phil, and asked
"what do you think about that". Phil answered, "Well usually they
[Private Eye] get it right". This exchange happened in front of me.
Although I was ill at the time (this was before I'd started taking
medicines) I hadn't read anything into the Eye cover until these guys
pointed it out to me.

Eclipse pub in Balham (20/Dec/2002)

Certainty level: 70%%

On Friday 20/December/2002 I went to Balham to do some shopping and eating. When I went into the Eclipse pub for a meal
there were two girls already at the bar being server, I ordered and sat down near the window. They sat down at the opposite
window seat, out of sight. After a few minutes they started screaming repetitively "section, section". They were reading
something and were trying to pretend that they were just repeating from what they were reading, but in reality it was quite
obvious they were talking about me, specifically to confinement under mental health.

As you can guess the behaviour of these unwise young things shows them to be from the underprivileged category which due to
the natural laws of society is seldom seen in the better classes of restaurant...