Re: Puddles t session again
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.support.dissociation only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: Puddles t session again         

Group: alt.support.dissociation · Group Profile
Author: astri
Date: May 12, 2008 18:41

On Mon, 12 May 2008, Puddles wrote:
> On May 12, 9:24 pm, astri wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Puddle wrote:
>>> On May 12, 8:35 pm, astri wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008, Puddle wrote:
>>
>>>>> Will try to work with rave, maybe let her color it out. Will
>>>>> draft an email but not sure what to say.
>>
>>>> start with what you wrote initially in this post and then edit it.
>>>> add your actual feelings about it -- how you understand he was
>>>> distracted and had needs and you ended up taking care of him but
>>>> that it doesn't totally sit well with you that you did that.
>>
>>>>> Long sigh. Think you really understand me. Pretending and mind
>>>>> reading and all that. I keep working on it.
>>
>>>> heh
>>
>>>> btdt
>>
>>>>> I had sent t an email the other day explaining that therapy was
>>>>> the most important thing in my life and that makes him the most
>>>>> important (you taught me that and I finally toll him). Toll him
>>>>> this is why I am so protective of his boundaries. Wish he would
>>>>> jus catch on to what I am doing.
>>
>>>> mind reading expectations again.
>>
>>>> we finally discovered after years of wishing t could read minds
>>>> that it worked much better to be totally straightforward.
>>
>>>>> Do you approach bad sessions with your t? seems so awkward.
>>
>>>>> puddles
>>
>>>> we try to. haven't had any with this t yet, actually.
>>
>>>> with old t in az, we had a really bad ending. had been decidedly
>>>> good tpy, but not great ending. we decided to move to hi to be
>>>> with c. told her in december we would be moving in summer.
>>>> exactly same session, she was there to tell us she was going to
>>>> need s*rgery for breast c*ncer (all ended up fine for her, btw).
>>
>>>> she wouldn't let us tell her our news until after she told her
>>>> news. then she interpreted our news as reaction to her news
>>>> (definitely wasn't), and told us was mistake. and she got mad at
>>>> us and didn't tell us she was mad but it made bad sessions for
>>>> months until finally some of the kids asked her if she was mad at
>>>> us. she did say yes, and we were all able to deal with that and
>>>> end a bit better than it was looking like it was going to end.
>>
>>>> would have been much better to have discomfort talked about before
>>>> having it stew for months. sigh.
>>
>>> t was mad at you for months????? Cause she interrupted you? Wow.
>>> That is not good. Cant even stand *thinking* t is mad at us,
>>> couldnt imagine if he *actually* was. Would be dreadful. Is nice
>>> you figured out how to be straight forward. We are not there yet.
>>
>> yes, she was mad at us for months. not because she interrupted us.
>> because she thought we were impulsively abandoning her in response
>> to her getting sick. she never could hear that we had actually made
>> a considered and good decision for us. was dreadful and twisted
>> around.
>>
>>> Funny, this is the email I drafted cause thought you had got off
>>> line. Is terrible but what I would have said: Maybe you will see
>>> how abstract my world is. Is hard to say *straight forward* things
>>> to him.:
>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>> I am not with a water level. It is so far above my head I can't
>>> measure it. I am laying on the bottom of the water. Black silence.
>>
>>> Thinking I don't want to see you thurs., I "lost" you again.
>>
>>> Kind of like when you are too sick to go to the doctor......I am
>>> too far gone to see you anymore.
>>
>>> Not sure what I am doing to myself. Just lost, completely. And its
>>> black. And its silent. I think I drowned.
>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>> See??? Am laughing as we read this. Is true though. Think LOTS of
>>> rave coming out in this email (not yet sent tg). This is how we try
>>> to get t to understand. Isn't it terrible that we do this? (still
>>> laughing at ourselves).
>>
>>> puddles
>>
>> heh. yes, he prolly won't know *what* that actually means. really
>> suggest you send it *with* *translation*. say, "this is how we
>> feel..." and then "this is what that means...."
>>
>> still think your original post on this thread would say it well.
>> send both.
>>
>> if you really want to take care of him and make his job easier, send
>> the feelings with the translation. would help both of you.
>
> :)))) still laughing when we read that. yes, think your last t was a
> little twisted. Sounds like she was going through a lot and didn't
> want to lose her favorite client. Like you said b4,, is *never*
> boring treating did. Matter of fact, seems that she enjoyed treating
> you and was mad at herself for losiing you. Pretty much what you
> already said here. Have you sent her any updates since move?

don't know that we were her favorite client. prolly not. and it
wasn't as though she was going to miss treating multiples. she pretty
much *only* treated multiples.
> Yes, we will edit first post and send that instead. Seems like it is
> easier, much easier, to write what we feel here rather than to tell
> t. hmmm. scratching head.

of course it is. he's way too important for it to be easy to tell him
what you really mean. (important to, but not easy)

-- astri

======================
to email send to astri
======================
at volcano dot org
======================
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!