On Aug 28, 9:22 am, joe home.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:51:52 -0400, Dan Sullivan optonline.net>
>> On Aug 27, 10:32 am, Buel A. Targus wrote:
>>> Is Greg's real name Don?
>> Greg is Gregory Scott Hanson of Cedar Falls, Iowa.
>> You are being called Don because anyone who is new here who isn't
>> acutely rabid about CPS must be this person (actually he was called
>> Kane) who hasn't posted here in a year or so.
>> There are basically two groups of people who post here.
>> The oldest group believes anyone who is involved with CPS should fight
>> them over every issue, big or small.
> The *oldest group* as you call them, were falsely accused parents and
> grandparents who had come here to vent, talk about their cases, exchange
> opinions, post links and most importantly to SUPPORT one another against
> CPS false allegations and abuse.
>> If CPS has already removed their children to foster care and a newbie
>> takes that advice, chances are they won't be getting their children
> Then Dan arrived. He immediatly began a flame war with another member,
> wasting no time with his *divide and conquer* strategy -
I simply had a different approach to dealing with CPS.
A very successful approach.
And it continued to be successful on asCPS when people accepted my
> suddenly, instead
> of being one support group, it became two political groups -- Then Dan
> introduced Kane to invoke terror with his visious attacks, false
> allegations, lies, and libel against anyone who dared to disagree with
I didn't introduce Kane to asCPS.
And Kane has his own opinions.
> Parents and their supporters soon tired of the constant flame wars
> and left ASCPS and the CPS takeover was complete. For the past 5 years
> ASCPS has been little more than a constant daily attack of Greg.
greg is the resident child abuser who was founded for good cause.
He claims he had the mother's PERMISSION to abuse her daughter.
>> The newer group (since mid 2001) believes some necessary and
>> appropriate compliance serves to not alienate CPS and allows the
>> family to gather information (from the inside) that CPS has violated
>> their own rules, regulations, policies and procedures.
> The *newer group* as Dan calls them, may be little more than trolls -- as
> neither Dan, or his hero Kane seem to have any real knowledge of the
> workings of CPS and their courts. Th
>> And those violations are used to prove CPS doesn't have the credible
>> evidence to keep the children in foster care.
> They don't seem to understand that CPS doesn't need evidence to keep kids
> in foster care.
If there's no evidence to justify the removal of the children, then
when that's proven in Court, the children should be returned to the
>> Most of the anti-CPS websites, and this one prior to my arrival, push
>> for the all out attack on CPS.
> Dan imagines himself Christ like and refers to time on ASCPS as *prior to
> my arrival* and *after my arrival* in between his petty attacks on Greg or
"Christ like..." there's something new.
>> And only on rare occasions when families take their advice are the
>> children returned to their parents.
> Dan never provides proof - he just declares stuff to be so.
The proof is all the people that I helped on asCPS who thanked me when
they got their children back.
>> And because I recommend some level of necessary cooperation with CPS
>> the all out war people call me a CPS apologist or even a CPS case
> Mostly we call Dan pathetic. He has no advice - he has never posted any
> unique or even specific advice. He is basically a generic CPS ass kisser.
Not true at all.
>> I have been extremely successful in helping people get their children
> Dan is a parent hating CPS plant who has done everything within his power
> to insure that falsely accused parents have no safe haven from false
> accusations, lies and abuse.
I try to help everyone I can.
I even tried to help greg back in 2001.
But it became evident that greg didn't want his girlfriend to get her
All he wanted to know was how to sue CPS.
And if you haven't been here to see the advice greg hands out...
he advised a woman to admit in family court that she broke the law.
he claimed there was a "bright side" to a TPR hearing. The hearing
when parents completely lose custody of their children.
Do you recall this advice?
Do you agree with this advice?
greg hanson is the exact reason there is a Child Protective Service.