> First it wasn't your plan and second you seem to have missed the part
> where Frank was tried on obscenity charges and not possession of
> child porn. It appears from the sequence of events in the time line that
> the child porn was not on the search warrant, the prosecution was
> prohibited from adding it to the indictment or mentioning it at trial
> because it is inadmissable. Not only could it not be used at this trial
> it's inadmissable in any future trial. The warrant was faulty for not
> mentioning child porn and anything not mentioned is inadmissable.
> Essentually, it seems the government, so fixated on punishing Frank
> for his stories overlooked the possibility he might have collected
> child porn. Betcha some one at DOJ got his ass kicked.

> WHY was this made into a Child Protective Services Investigation?
> Why wasn't it screened out at the hotline level?
>
> Are CPS agencies misusing Federal dollars by refusing
> to screen out ANY hotline reports?
>
> http://www.sfltimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=454...
>
> Teachers cleared of sprinkling “holy water,” now under criminal
> probe
> Written by ELGIN JONES
>
> FORT LAUDERDALE — School district officials have cleared two teachers
> of spraying holy water onto an atheist colleague, but now the teachers
> face new, criminal allegations.
>
> The criminal investigation centers on another complaint alleging that
> the teachers caused students “mental injury” by disparaging Haiti in a
> classroom. ...