alt.support.child-protective-services
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.support.child-protective-services only
 
Advanced search
January 2007
motuwethfrsasuw
1234567 1
891011121314 2
15161718192021 3
22232425262728 4
293031     5
2007
 Jan   Feb   Mar   Apr 
 May   Jun   Jul   Aug 
 Sep   Oct   Nov   Dec 
2007 2006    
total
... .child-protective-services Profile…
RELATED GROUPS

POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
  Re: RON AND KANE READ THIS IF YOU CAN         


Author: Ron
Date: Jan 26, 2007 12:05

"krp" verizon.net> wrote in message
news:icnuh.3267$R65.3088@trnddc01...
>
> "Ron" netscape.net> wrote in message
> news:pTcuh.104768$fh6.3544@newsfe13.lga...
>
>> Now, what I did say is that your interpretation of the validity of the
>> use of SAC Dolls in child sexual abuse investigations is that of an
>> ignorant individual, and I stand by that statement. Which is of course
>> why I attempted to provide you with a bit of education on the subject
>> prior to our discussion of them, but you chose to not read the
>> information I offered and of course without a frame of reference you were
>> unable to debate the topic. Which is why we have not debated it.
>>
>> And you continue to make statements about the validity of the use of SAC
>> dolls even to this day, and again from ignorance. Until you educate
>> yourself on the subject we cannot debate it.
>
>
> Okay AGAIN show me where the use of the SAC Dolls to assess sexual ...
Show full article (1.48Kb)
1 Comment
  Re: R R RR R R ,,,,         


Author: Greegor
Date: Jan 19, 2007 20:13

> Come on, Greg. You brought him here
> to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.

Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
> You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
> No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
> pieces of crap that have joined you here.

UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!
no comments
  Re: 9yr old runaway         


Author: Greegor
Date: Jan 19, 2007 20:01

Re: violent video games
I agree for the most part, except for some it's a
CATHARSIS or a place to take out anxieties.

Some women actually think soap operas are
a model to strive for.
no comments
  Re: Ron quoting out of context         


Author: 0:->
Date: Jan 19, 2007 16:02

Doan wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Ron wrote:
>> It looks to me doan that you do little but quote out of context. But of
>> course you will never admit to doing that, so.....
>>
>> Ron
>>
>
> Ron:
>
> "of all children in foster care in the State during the period under
> review, the percentage of children who were the subject of
> substantiated or indicated maltreatment by a foster parent or facility
> staff is 0.57%% or less."
>
> Doan:
> Now you are practicing taking things OUT OF CONTEXT! Why did you do
> that, Ron?
>
> Michael: ...
Show full article (1.95Kb)
no comments
  Re: Fergie question         


Author: Going for Broke
Date: Jan 19, 2007 09:23

Is that you Michael Richards??

""0:->"" gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d5b814c5c3d85393a91c244642cb5ad4@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> Why are NIGGERS allowed to breed?
>
> They should STERLIZE them at BIRTH.
>
> I HATE NIGGERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
no comments
  Re: Argument out of the past, and done then...was...Re: Spanking and non-cp alternatives compared         


Author: 0:->
Date: Jan 19, 2007 07:08

krp wrote:
> "0:->" gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:99adnYsB84fxtC3YnZ2dnUVZ_oGlnZ2d@scnresearch.com...
>> Greegor wrote:
>>> Doan wrote:
>>>> Comparing Child Outcomes of Physical Punishment and Alternative
>>>> Disciplinary Tactics: A Meta-Analysis
>>>> Robert E. Larzelere1,2 and Brett R. Kuhn1
>>
>> Larzelere et all have long been identified as belonging to a right leaning
>> religious faction that is a propaganda arm for the spanking proponents.
>> Does the name Families First ring a bell for anyone?
>
>
> HEY SHITHEAD

Aw....such a nice little fellow.

How'd you like my mimicking of you yesterday, Ken?

I wanted people to not miss what they invited an encourages to come
here....a vile, dishonest, bloward fraud such as you.
Show full article (2.04Kb)
no comments
  Re: 9yr old runaway         


Author: spd
Date: Jan 19, 2007 05:58

Greegor wrote:
> Dan Sullivan wrote:
>> Why do you ask?
>
> Because you asked, ""Oliver""!

The kid's mom should get rid of that damn PlayStation ! The kid can't
separate reality from fiction...in those games the player
car-jacks,robs banks,ambushes a police station, nude strip
dancers,gangbangers,terrorist,swat team,bomb squad,thats just to name a
few things these games are all about...I guess the public should
consider themselves pretty lucky~just think what that kid or the next
one could do...is it the kid's fault or the game's makers fault ?

The makers of these games make lots of money and I know what 1st
amendment rights are...
2 cents,

spd
1 Comment
  Re: Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context ... was ... Re: Argument to the Black community on ...         


Author: Doan
Date: Jan 18, 2007 23:08

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
> Doan wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
>>
>>> Doan wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Doan wrote:
>>>>>> So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply"...
Show full article (2.23Kb)
no comments
  Re: Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context ... was ... Re: Argument to the Black community on ...         


Author: Doan
Date: Jan 18, 2007 23:05

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
> Doan wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
>>
>>> Doan wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Doan wrote:
>>>>>> So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply"...
Show full article (6.86Kb)
no comments
  Re: Sampling the poster's lies by rejection and concealing of context ... was ... Re: Argument to the Black community on ...         


Author: Doan
Date: Jan 18, 2007 22:05

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
> Doan wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, 0:-> wrote:
>>
>>> Doan wrote:
>>>> So much for the claim that I am on Kane's "do-not-reply" list and he
>>>> doesn't read my posts! How STUPID can this...
Show full article (1.15Kb)
2 Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9