|
|
 Up |
|
  |
|
|
|
Author: prioritymanpriorityman Date: Sep 2, 2007 12:28
On 2 Sep, 05:06, Linda hotmail.com> wrote:> The pentagon has cornered Koochers Kooks aka APA in a double bind
> which is bound to turn Koochers Schizogenic Kooks into Koochers
> Schizophrenic Kooks!
>
> http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_linda_m__070901_a_sad_day_for...
>
> September 1, 2007 at 16:37:55
>
> A Sad Day for Psychologists, a Sadder Day for Human Rights
> by Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
>
> http://www.opednews.com
>
> .{......}
>
> Col. Larry James, a psychologist at Guantanamo Bay speaking before the
> APA
> Council of Representatives, stated not once but twice, "If we remove
> psychologists from these facilities, people are going to die." This ...
|
| Show full article (2.01Kb) |
|
| | 11 Comments |
|
|
Author: LindaLinda Date: Sep 3, 2007 09:56
On Sep 2, 3:28 am, "priority...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> On 2 Sep, 05:06, Linda hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> The pentagon has cornered Koochers Kooks aka APA in a double bind
>> which is bound to turn Koochers Schizogenic Kooks into Koochers
>> Schizophrenic Kooks!
>
>
>> September 1, 2007 at 16:37:55
>
>> A Sad Day for Psychologists, a Sadder Day for Human Rights
>> by Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
>
|
| Show full article (2.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: prioritymanpriorityman Date: Sep 3, 2007 10:02
On 3 Sep, 09:56, Linda netzero.com> wrote:>> 1. If people are going to dismiss what I have to say, such people are
> going to dismiss it no matter how I present it.
Certainly some of them will. But others will move on because they
don't understand the subject headings. Other will be put off because
of the oddity of terms or feel they are missing the context.
> 2. I'm *afraid* to publish polished reports about this subject because
> the authors who publish polished reports about this subject have a
> habit of disappearing off the face of the earth. :-(
OK. I respect that kind of fear. I don't think polished was the
issue I was raising here Linda. I think this argument actually backs
up my point. Why did the ones who wrote it more professionally
disappear? because their communication was seen as more effective. If
you think it is dangerous to be effective, fine. As I said, I respect
that kind of fear.
|
| Show full article (2.89Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: LindaLinda Date: Sep 3, 2007 16:22
On Sep 3, 1:02 am, "priority...@ gmail.com" gmail.com>
wrote:> On 3 Sep, 09:56, Linda netzero.com> wrote:
>>>> 1. If people are going to dismiss what I have to say, such people are
>> going to dismiss it no matter how I present it.
>
> Certainly some of them will. But others will move on because they
> don't understand the subject headings. Other will be put off because
> of the oddity of terms or feel they are missing the context.
So long as there are cyberpaths cruising the forums I subscribe to
there won't be much of an audience.
|
| Show full article (3.28Kb) |
| 5 Comments |
|
|
Author: FrankFrank Date: Sep 3, 2007 16:55
>> On 3 Sep, 09:56, Linda netzero.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 1. If people are going to dismiss what I have to say, such people
>>>> are
>>> going to dismiss it no matter how I present it.
>>
>> Certainly some of them will. But others will move on because they
>> don't understand the subject headings. Other will be put off because
>> of the oddity of terms or feel they are missing the context.
>
>So long as there are cyberpaths cruising the forums I subscribe to
>there won't be much of an audience.
>
Lousy excuse.
|
| Show full article (3.71Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Dr. DreDr. Dre Date: Sep 3, 2007 16:59
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:02:22 -0700, priorityman@ gmail.com wrote:
> On 3 Sep, 09:56, Linda netzero.com> wrote:>>> 1. If people are going to dismiss what I have to say, such people are
>> going to dismiss it no matter how I present it.
>
> Certainly some...
|
| Show full article (3.42Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: prioritymanpriorityman Date: Sep 3, 2007 17:20
On 3 Sep, 16:55, "Frank" skippy.net> wrote:>>> On 3 Sep, 09:56, Linda netzero.com> wrote:>
>>>>> 1. If people are going to dismiss what I have to say, such people
>>>>> are
>>>> going to dismiss it no matter how I present it.
>
>>> Certainly some of them will. But others will move on because they
>>> don't understand the subject headings. Other will be put off because
>>> of the oddity of terms or feel they are missing the context.
>
>>So long as there are cyberpaths cruising the forums I subscribe to
>>there won't be much of an audience.
> ...
|
| Show full article (3.91Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: prioritymanpriorityman Date: Sep 3, 2007 17:26
On 3 Sep, 16:22, Linda hotmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't say I'm less effective then those who published polished
> articles.
Good. So you disagree with their judgement and think your articles
will reach and convince other people as effectively and more
'polished' articles. I think you are incorrect here. But as I said,
I respect the safety issue. Again, I need to repeat that for me the
issue is not one of being polished, but rather the inclusion of
Koocher's Kooks primarily and repeating of these words. You took this
to mean I thought you should be more polished which is not the case.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: FrankFrank Date: Sep 3, 2007 17:42
>
>I find it amazing how much Linda gets harrassed by people who think
>she is not capable. Certainly you can see the world being negatively
>affected by people who have power and wield it well in their own self-
>interests. Yet, you take time to mock and insult someone who you also
>seem to think will have little effect. What does that make you? What
>role have you chosen for yourself and why?
>
>Good luck with it. I'm not interested in your answers, but you should
>be.
>
LOL, as if your thoughts had significant meaning.
OOPS! Are you reading this? tsk, tsk.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
