Rose, is Shaw.ca a thing of the past? Mail to you was
bouncing and I asked the sysop about it.

His test (and mine later) showed that shaw.ca does not
exist anymore.

I just tried it one more time and it's still doesn't
respond (20:55 PDT).

From: sysop
To: CALIFCHIEF
Date: 5/20/2008 6:13 AM
Subject: Re: Undeliverable mail

Joe,

I just tried to ping shaw.ca (from DOS type PING shaw.ca)
and it was a dead URL.

US court: Paper money discriminates against blind
Tuesday, May 20, 2008 13:19 EDT

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The U.S. discriminates against blind people by printing paper money that makes it impossible for them to distinguish among the bills' varying values, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upholds a decision by a lower court in 2006.

It could force the Treasury Department to redesign its money.

Suggested changes have ranged from making bills different sizes to printing them with raised markings.

The American Council for the Blind sued for such changes but the Treasury Department has been fighting the case for about six years.

"I don't think we should have to rely on people to tell us what our money is," said Mitch Pomerantz, the council's president.

The U.S. acknowledges the design hinders blind people but it argued that blind people have adapted.

Some relied on store clerks to help them, some used credit cards and others folded certain corners to help distinguish between bills.

The court ruled 2-1 that such adaptations were insufficient.

The government might as well argue that, since handicapped people can crawl on all fours or ask for help from strangers, there's no need to make buildings wheelchair accessible, the court said.

"Even the most searching tactile examination will reveal no difference between a $100 bill and a $1 bill. The Secretary has identified no reason that requires paper currency to be uniform to the touch," Judge Judith W. Rogers wrote for the majority.

Courts can't decide how to design the currency, since that's up to the Treasury Department.

But the ruling forces the department to address what the court called a discriminatory problem.

Pomerantz says it could take years to change the look of money and until then, he expects that similar-looking money will continue to get printed and spent.

But since blindness becomes more common with age, people in the 30s and 40s should know that, when they get older, "they will be able to identify their $1 bills from their fives, tens and twenties," he said.

Officials at the Treasury Department and the department's Bureau of Engraving and Printing, which prints the nation's currency, had no immediate comment on the ruling.

The government could appeal to the Supreme Court.