|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Wouter ValentijnWouter Valentijn Date: Oct 23, 2006 11:13
Steven L. wrote:
> October 19, 2006
> by Anthony Pascale
>
> Still unclear how many TOS roles are being recast,
> but another source indicates that the treatment included the
> characters of McCoy and Scotty in addition to Kirk and Spock. The
>
|
| |
|
| | 115 Comments |
|
|
Author: AnybodyAnybody Date: Oct 23, 2006 13:24
In article <453d0655$0$321$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, "Wouter Valentijn"
wrote:
|
| Show full article (0.96Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Brian ThornBrian Thorn Date: Oct 23, 2006 15:49
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:24:00 +1300, Anybody
anywhere-anytime.com> wrote:
>Last I read it was about Kirk and co. at the Academy - Star Trek Hills
>90210.
Yeah, that was the early speculation. Then we started getting reports
about Matt Damon or Ben Affleck being approached to play Kirk, both of
whom are much too old to be portraying an Academy cadet...
Brian
|
| |
| 112 Comments |
|
|
Author: JaxtrawJaxtraw Date: Oct 23, 2006 16:23
Brian Thorn wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:24:00 +1300, Anybody
> anywhere-anytime.com> wrote:
>
>>> Last I read it was about Kirk and co. at the Academy - Star Trek
>> Hills 90210.
>
> Yeah, that was the early speculation. Then we started getting reports
> about Matt Damon or Ben Affleck being approached to play Kirk, both of
> whom are much too old to be portraying an Academy cadet...
Most of the cast of 90210 were way too old to be teenagers also :)
Ian
|
| |
| 111 Comments |
|
|
Author: Steven L.Steven L. Date: Oct 23, 2006 18:34
Jaxtraw wrote:
> Brian Thorn wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:24:00 +1300, Anybody
>> anywhere-anytime.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Last I read it was about Kirk and co. at the Academy - Star Trek
>>> Hills 90210.
>> Yeah, that was the early speculation. Then we started getting reports
>> about Matt Damon or Ben Affleck being approached to play Kirk, both of
>> whom are much too old to be portraying an Academy cadet...
>
> Most of the cast of 90210 were way too old to be teenagers also :)
I didn't watch the show, but if 90210 portrayed teenagers naked or
having sex, then Hollywood had to cast older actors to play them.
Hollywood codes for mainstream TV shows have banned using young actors
to play such scenes.
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Oct 23, 2006 19:14
Steven L. wrote:
> Jaxtraw wrote:
>
>> Brian Thorn wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:24:00 +1300, Anybody
>>> anywhere-anytime.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> Last I read it was about Kirk and co. at the Academy - Star Trek
>>>> Hills 90210.
>>>
>>> Yeah, that was the early speculation. Then we started getting reports
>>> about Matt Damon or Ben Affleck being approached to play Kirk, both of
>>> whom are much too old to be portraying an Academy cadet...
>>
>>
>> Most of the cast of 90210 were way too old to be teenagers also :)
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (1.30Kb) |
| 2 Comments |
|
|
Author: AnybodyAnybody Date: Oct 23, 2006 21:16
In article <453d4ddc$0$21351$db0fefd9@ news.zen.co.uk>, "Jaxtraw"
knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote:
> Brian Thorn wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:24:00 +1300, Anybody
>> anywhere-anytime.com> wrote:
>>>>> Last I read it was about Kirk and co. at the Academy - Star Trek
>>> Hills 90210.
>>
>> Yeah, that was the early speculation. Then we started getting reports
>> about Matt Damon or Ben Affleck being approached to play Kirk, both of
>> whom are much too old to be portraying an Academy cadet...
If they're going to start mucking about in the established Kirk era,
then they're really gonna face troubles with many fans and it was
already going to be a silly "reboot", ie. do whatever the hell we want
and sod the fans and established storylines.
> Most of the cast of 90210 were way too old to be teenagers also :)
|
| Show full article (1.31Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Oct 23, 2006 21:39
Anybody wrote:
> If they're going to start mucking about in the established Kirk era,
> then they're really gonna face troubles with many fans and it was
> already going to be a silly "reboot", ie. do whatever the hell we want
> and sod the fans and established storylines.
Maybe it won't be a silly reboot. My hope is that, just once, the
established TOS canon and faithful fan's wishes will actually be
respected, for once.
|
| |
| 103 Comments |
|
|
Author: AnybodyAnybody Date: Oct 23, 2006 22:20
In article comcast.com>,
ToolPackinMama lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
> Anybody wrote:
>
>> If they're going to start mucking about in the established Kirk era,
>> then they're really gonna face troubles with many fans and it was
>> already going to be a silly "reboot", ie. do whatever the hell we want
>> and sod the fans and established storylines.
>
> Maybe it won't be a silly reboot. My hope is that, just once, the
> established TOS canon and faithful fan's wishes will actually be
> respected, for once.
What's the likelihood of that? Probably about -500%%. Some idiot at the
top has almost certainly seen the success of the new "Battlestar
Galactica" and will want to clone that idea and create a new "Star
Trek" that's almost nothing like the original. :-(
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Oct 23, 2006 22:46
Anybody wrote:
> In article comcast.com>,
> ToolPackinMama lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>
> >>Anybody wrote:
>>
>>
>>>If they're going to start mucking about in the established Kirk era,
>>>then they're really gonna face troubles with many fans and it was
>>>already going to be a silly "reboot", ie. do whatever the hell we want
>>>and sod the fans and established storylines.
>>
>>Maybe it won't be a silly reboot. My hope is that, just once, the
>>established TOS canon and faithful fan's wishes will actually be
>>respected, for once.
>
>
> What's the likelihood of that? Probably about -500%%. Some idiot at the
> top has almost certainly seen the success of the new "Battlestar ...
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
| 10 Comments |
|
|
|
|
