|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Steven L.Steven L. Date: Feb 13, 2008 17:57
from variety
'Star Trek' pushed back to 2009
Paramount shuffles major releases
By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK
Paramount is pushing back the release of "Star Trek" from Dec. 15 to
May 8, 2009.
Move was part of a major reshuffling to the studio's release calendar,
as well as DreamWorks' release calendar.
Studio insiders said "Star Trek" has the potential to gross more in
May than in December.
All the majors are likely to revisit their 2008 and 2009 release skeds
in the wake of the writer's strike now being over. There's an
abundance of films slated for release this year, and particularly
comedies. It's likely that Par won't be the only studio pushing back
films to 2009.
"Star Trek" has no competition in its new slot--at least not so far.
One week earlier, 20th Century Fox bows "X-Men Origins: Wolverine."
Paramount also announced that Martin Scorsese's Leonardo
DiCaprio-starrer "Shutter Island" will be released Oct. 2, 2008.
|
| Show full article (1.09Kb) |
|
| | 52 Comments |
|
|
Author: WarchildWarchild Date: Feb 13, 2008 18:38
> from variety
>
> 'Star Trek' pushed back to 2009
> Paramount shuffles major releases
> By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK
>
> Paramount is pushing back the release of "Star Trek" from Dec. 15 to
> May 8, 2009.
...
|
| Show full article (1.21Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: JaxtrawJaxtraw Date: Feb 13, 2008 20:32
Steven L. wrote:
> from variety
>
> 'Star Trek' pushed back to 2009
> Paramount shuffles major releases
> By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK
>
> Paramount is pushing back the release of "Star Trek" from Dec. 15 to
> May 8, 2009.
>
> Move was part of a major reshuffling to the studio's release calendar,
> as well as DreamWorks' release calendar.
>
> Studio insiders said "Star Trek" has the potential to gross more in
> May than in December.
>
> All the majors are likely to revisit their 2008 and 2009 release skeds
> in the wake of the writer's strike now being over. There's an
> abundance of films slated for release this year, and particularly
> comedies. It's likely that Par won't be the only studio pushing back ...
|
| Show full article (1.24Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AnybodyAnybody Date: Feb 13, 2008 21:26
In article <47b3c467$0$13936$fa0fcedb@ news.zen.co.uk>, "Jaxtraw"
knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote:
> Steven L. wrote:
>> from variety
>>
>> 'Star Trek' pushed back to 2009
>> Paramount shuffles major releases
>> By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK
>>
>> Paramount is pushing back the release of "Star Trek" from...
|
| Show full article (1.56Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AnybodyAnybody Date: Feb 13, 2008 21:30
In article
earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>, Warchild
bob.com> wrote:
>> from variety
>>
>> 'Star Trek' pushed back to 2009
>> Paramount shuffles major releases
>>...
|
| Show full article (1.75Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: GeneKGeneK Date: Feb 13, 2008 21:57
"Anybody" anywhere-anytime.com> wrote> Of course it begs the question as to the REAL reason why they're
> delaying it - re-writes???
Casting, if course. There are still hundreds of actors
who have still not been announed as being cast in the
film yet.
Genek
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
Author: KweegKweeg Date: Feb 13, 2008 22:15
"GeneK" genek_hates_spammers.com> wrote in message
news:TKQsj.14769$QJ3.13025@newsfe07.phx...>
> "Anybody" anywhere-anytime.com> wrote>> Of course it begs the question as to the REAL reason why they're
>> delaying it - re-writes???
>
> Casting, if course. There are still hundreds of actors
> who have still not been announed as being cast in the
> film yet.
Heh
Or perhaps someone's getting a giggle at all the fanbois dissecting every
morsel "leaked" to figure out how the movie is gona to suck and how no one
knows Star Trek like they do...
{{;-/>
--
|
| Show full article (0.78Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KweegKweeg Date: Feb 13, 2008 22:16
"Jaxtraw" knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote in message
news:47b3c467$0$13936$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...> Steven L. wrote:
>> from variety
>>
>> 'Star Trek' pushed back to 2009
>> Paramount shuffles major releases
>> By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK
>>
>> Paramount is pushing back the release of "Star Trek" from Dec. 15 to
>> May 8, 2009.
>>
>> Move was part of a major reshuffling to the studio's release calendar,
>> as well as DreamWorks' release calendar.
>>
>> Studio insiders said "Star Trek" has the potential to gross more in
>> May than in December.
>>
>> All the majors are likely to revisit their 2008 and 2009 release skeds
>> in the wake of the writer's strike now being over. There's an ...
|
| Show full article (1.63Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: KweegKweeg Date: Feb 13, 2008 22:17
"Anybody" anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
news:140220081826358648%%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...> In article <47b3c467$0$13936$fa0fcedb@ news.zen.co.uk>, "Jaxtraw"
> knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote:
>>> Steven L. wrote:
>>> from variety
>>>
>>> 'Star Trek' pushed back to 2009
>>> Paramount shuffles major releases
>>> By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK
>>>
>>> Paramount is pushing back the release of "Star Trek" from Dec. 15 to
>>> May 8, 2009.
>>>
>>> Move was part of a major reshuffling to the studio's release calendar,
>>> as well as DreamWorks' release calendar.
>>>
>>> Studio insiders said "Star Trek" has the potential to gross more in
>>> May than in December. ...
|
| Show full article (2.06Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Anim8rFSKAnim8rFSK Date: Feb 14, 2008 07:08
In article ,
"GeneK" genek_hates_spammers.com> wrote:
> "Anybody" anywhere-anytime.com> wrote>> Of course it begs the question as to the REAL reason why they're
>> delaying it - re-writes???
>
> Casting, if course. There are still hundreds of actors
> who have still not been announed as being cast in the
> film yet.
>
> Genek
Hee hee
Naw, it's writing. They've been using the strike as an excuse for why
they couldn't fix the script for months. They used it as an excuse for
why they couldn't involved the Shat as well. Hopefully now they'll
address all of that.
--
Star Trek 08:
No Shat, No Show.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
