>>

>
> That is rather ironic. It is not really surprising because doesn't Cawley
> basically do what Abrams is doing? Recast Trek? I was desperate for some new
> Trek and downloaded an episode of pretend Trek, but I didn't make it out of
> the first 10 min. Um...while I give them credit for trying....it was
> RIDICULOUS! LOL. I felt embarrassed like I was watching somebodies fantasy
> that should not be public!
>
>

> RuPEDski wrote:
>

>>>

>>
>> That is rather ironic. It is not really surprising because doesn't Cawley
>> basically do what Abrams is doing? Recast Trek? I was desperate for some
>> new Trek and downloaded an episode of pretend Trek, but I didn't make it
>> out of the first 10 min. Um...while I give them credit for trying....it
>> was RIDICULOUS! LOL. I felt embarrassed like I was watching somebodies
>> fantasy that should not be public!

>
> I have to agree. While I give Cawley credit for his expression of his
> fandom, I found that watching one of his episides gave me the impression
> of watching a production of Trek that might have been done by Ed Wood. It
> was painful to watch.
>
> I have high hopes for this new movie and hope that it does well, but
> putting Cawley in, even for a cameo is probably the first real mistake ...

> "JR" wrote in message
> news:R6bnj.4687$0s4.4448@fe097.usenetserver.com...

>> RuPEDski wrote:
>>

>>>>

>>>
>>> That is rather ironic. It is not really surprising because doesn't
>>> Cawley basically do what Abrams is doing? Recast Trek? I was
>>> desperate for some new Trek and downloaded an episode of pretend
>>> Trek, but I didn't make it out of the first 10 min. Um...while I
>>> give them credit for trying....it was RIDICULOUS! LOL. I felt
>>> embarrassed like I was watching somebodies fantasy that should not
>>> be public!

>>
>> I have to agree. While I give Cawley credit for his expression of
>> his fandom, I found that watching one of his episides gave me the
>> impression of watching a production of Trek that might have been
>> done by Ed Wood. It was painful to watch.
>> ...

> Snake wrote:

>> "JR" wrote in message
>> news:R6bnj.4687$0s4.4448@fe097.usenetserver.com...

>>> RuPEDski wrote:
>>>

>>>> That is rather ironic. It is not really surprising because doesn't
>>>> Cawley basically do what Abrams is doing? Recast Trek? I was
>>>> desperate for some new Trek and downloaded an episode of pretend
>>>> Trek, but I didn't make it out of the first 10 min. Um...while I
>>>> give them credit for trying....it was RIDICULOUS! LOL. I felt
>>>> embarrassed like I was watching somebodies fantasy that should not
>>>> be public!

>>> I have to agree. While I give Cawley credit for his expression of
>>> his fandom, I found that watching one of his episides gave me the
>>> impression of watching a production of Trek that might have been
>>> done by Ed Wood. It was painful to watch.
>>>
>>> I have high hopes for this new movie and hope that it does well, but
>>> putting Cawley in, even for a cameo is probably the first real ...

>I have to agree. While I give Cawley credit for his expression of his
>fandom, I found that watching one of his episides gave me the impression
>of watching a production of Trek that might have been done by Ed Wood.
>It was painful to watch.