> Jaxtraw wrote:

>> Snake wrote:

>>> "GeneK" genek_hates_spammers.com> wrote in message
>>> news:x9adnQPCSsYtmvfYnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@comcast.com...

>>>> "EvilBill" gmail.com> wrote...

>>>>> Elvis Gump wrote:

>>>>>> Please it's only a notch or two above an Ed Wood production!
>>>>>>

>>>>> Ed Wood wasn't an amateur fan film-maker, though ;) They have to
>>>>> go with what they can get.

>>>> I tend to judge fanfilms by looser standards than the official
>>>> releases. Even though they've managed to attract the participation
>>>> of some original Trek talent, the bottom line is that these are
>>>> amateurs playing in really big, elaborate Trek sim games, except
>>>> that the objective is not to play Kirk, Spock, etc., but to play at
>>>> being Shatner, Roddenberry and Jeffries. The standard for
>>>> comparison is not an official Trek movie or episode, but the
>>>> fan art displayed at cons and the videos people post of themselves
>>>> dressed as Klingons at the old Universal Studios tour. ...

> Elvis Gump wrote:

>> Jaxtraw wrote:

>>> Snake wrote:

>>>> "GeneK" genek_hates_spammers.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:x9adnQPCSsYtmvfYnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@comcast.com...

>>>>> "EvilBill" gmail.com> wrote...

>>>>>> Elvis Gump wrote:

>>>>>>> Please it's only a notch or two above an Ed Wood production!
>>>>>>>

>>>>>> Ed Wood wasn't an amateur fan film-maker, though ;) They have to
>>>>>> go with what they can get.

>>>>> I tend to judge fanfilms by looser standards than the official
>>>>> releases. Even though they've managed to attract the participation
>>>>> of some original Trek talent, the bottom line is that these are
>>>>> amateurs playing in really big, elaborate Trek sim games, except
>>>>> that the objective is not to play Kirk, Spock, etc., but to play at
>>>>> being Shatner, Roddenberry and Jeffries. The standard for
>>>>> comparison is not an official Trek movie or episode, but the
>>>>> fan art displayed at cons and the videos people post of themselves ...