> Don't tell me - you're one of those types who is never happy with
> *anything*, right? Doesn't matter what someone does, it's never (ever)
> "good enough"?

> They're **trying**. Better than Berman & Braga - who weren't trying
> anything, they were attempting to bend Star Trek to fit *their* mold.
> Crawley and Company are attempting to make Star Trek that is, well, still
> identifiably "Trek".
>
> Better than we've gotten from a lot of other directions, I'd say.
>
> Perfect? Not by a long shot.
>
> But I must give them credit for the attempt.

> "Snake" REMOVE-ME.verizon.IHATESPAM.SPAM_VAC.com> wrote
> in message news:cPsah.15304$w37.10266@trnddc08...

>> Don't tell me - you're one of those types who is never happy with
>> *anything*, right? Doesn't matter what someone does, it's never (ever)
>> "good enough"?

>
> LOL! Seems like it.

> They surely wasted weeks and weeks on shooting, editing and doing the FX
> for this and the result is an embarrassing mess.

> Elvis Gump wrote:
>

>> They surely wasted weeks and weeks on shooting, editing and doing the
>> FX for this and the result is an embarrassing mess.

>
> Fortunately we live in the future, so it might only be a matter of time
> before someone cuts away all the worst parts and digitally replaces them
> with better ones.

> They surely wasted weeks and weeks on shooting, editing and doing the FX
> for this and the result is an embarrassing mess.