|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
|
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Aug 28, 2008 00:17
|
| |
|
| | 88 Comments |
|
  |
Author: QuadiblocQuadibloc Date: Aug 29, 2008 10:32
On Aug 28, 1:17Â am, ToolPackinMama comcast.net> wrote:
This reminds me of a news item I saw today about Barack Obama. While I
think I prefer the competition for President, I did like all his
campaign promises.
However, one of them was a promise to cut taxes for working families
by 95%%.
That would mean cutting the Federal budget by almost 95%%. Even with
the wealthy paying higher taxes to pay their fair share, there are so
few rich people that almost all government revenue does have to come
from ordinary people who work for a living.
Unless maybe Obama thinks he can run the country almost entirely on
taxes from (working-class!) bachelors. Paying all those high taxes, of
course, how will they ever manage to impress a girl...
John Savard
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: QuadiblocQuadibloc Date: Aug 29, 2008 10:37
On Aug 29, 11:32Â am, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Aug 28, 1:17Â am, ToolPackinMama comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> This reminds me of a news item I saw today about Barack Obama. While I
> think I prefer the competition for President, I did like all his
> campaign promises.
>
> However, one of them was a promise to cut taxes for working families
> by 95%%.
|
| Show full article (0.97Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: SparkoHeapsSparkoHeaps Date: Aug 29, 2008 11:49
On Aug 29, 11:32Â am, Quadibloc wrote:
> On Aug 28, 1:17Â am, ToolPackinMama comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> This reminds me of a news item I saw today about Barack Obama. While I
> think I prefer the competition for President, I did like all his
> campaign promises.
>
> However, one of them was a promise to cut taxes for working families
> by 95%%.
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: QuadiblocQuadibloc Date: Aug 29, 2008 12:55
On Aug 29, 12:49Â pm, SparkoHe...@ gmail.com wrote:
> What he actually said was that he would cut taxes for 95%% of working
> class families. Big difference.
Yes, indeed. The report I saw was inaccurate.
John Savard
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
Author: GiseleGisele Date: Aug 29, 2008 13:56
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: JKconeyJKconey Date: Aug 30, 2008 11:02
> On Aug 28, 1:17 am, ToolPackinMama comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
Thought you'd like to know Mama, that at the ST con in Vegas there were
over 3000 guests, and all of them referred to themselves as "TREKKERS". LOL
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: ToolPackinMamaToolPackinMama Date: Aug 30, 2008 11:08
JKconey wrote:
>> On Aug 28, 1:17 am, ToolPackinMama comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>
>
> Thought you'd like to know Mama, that at the ST con in Vegas there were
> over 3000 guests, and all of them referred to themselves as "TREKKERS". LOL
Sure they did. :)
I was a Trekkie before Trekkers were born, like every single Trek Fan
who was a fan from the start.
I know what I am. :)
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: QuadiblocQuadibloc Date: Aug 31, 2008 12:22
On Aug 28, 1:17 am, ToolPackinMama comcast.net> wrote:
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: JKconeyJKconey Date: Sep 2, 2008 09:55
"ToolPackinMama" comcast.net> wrote in message
news:EKydnWCUeogdESTVnZ2dnUVZ_jOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> JKconey wrote:
>>> On Aug 28, 1:17 am, ToolPackinMama comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thought you'd like to know Mama, that at the ST con in Vegas there
>> were over 3000 guests, and all of them referred to themselves as
>> "TREKKERS". LOL
>
> Sure they did. :)
>
> I was a Trekkie before Trekkers were born, like every single Trek Fan who
> was a fan from the start.
>
> I know what I am. :)
|
| Show full article (1.04Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|