Re: Re auctioned prop
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
alt.startrek only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

alt.startrek Profile…
 Up
Re: Re auctioned prop         


Author: Kweeg
Date: Jan 2, 2008 12:30

"Livia" uniserve.com> wrote in message
news:477AD547.D031E2F0@uniserve.com...
> Anyone who would pay those prices for fan junk is crazy anyway. There
> really is a sucker born every minute.

Why? It probably won't go down in value. Some would say paying 500 thou for
a "known" painting is crazy but it won't go down in value. If one has the
cash it makes much more sense to invest in an original than a reproduction
that *will* go down in value.

--

Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
1,079,252,848.8 km/h, not just a good idea, it's the law.
"So say we all!"
2 Comments
Re: Re auctioned prop         


Author: Steven L.
Date: Jan 2, 2008 15:35

Kweeg wrote:
> "Livia" uniserve.com> wrote in message
> news:477AD547.D031E2F0@uniserve.com...
>> Anyone who would pay those prices for fan junk is crazy anyway. There
>> really is a sucker born every minute.
>
> Why? It probably won't go down in value. Some would say paying 500 thou for
> a "known" painting is crazy but it won't go down in value. If one has the
> cash it makes much more sense to invest in an original than a reproduction
> that *will* go down in value.

Classic paintings are different. It's highly unlikely that a shift in
cultural attitudes will cause society to regard Rembrandt less highly in
the future (which would depress the value of his paintings). His place
in art history is assured, and the value of his work is assured.

But when you buy TV memorabilia, there is a definite risk that the
culture may evolve to the point that nobody will care about that TV show
anymore. And then the resale value of that memorabilia will decline.
Show full article (1.59Kb)
no comments
Re: Re auctioned prop         


Author: Kweeg
Date: Jan 2, 2008 17:10

"Steven L." earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:13no7udjhq3lrae@corp.supernews.com...
> Kweeg wrote:
>> "Livia" uniserve.com> wrote in message
>> news:477AD547.D031E2F0@uniserve.com...
>>> Anyone who would pay those prices for fan junk is crazy anyway. There
>>> really is a sucker born every minute.
>>
>> Why? It probably won't go down in value. Some would say paying 500 thou
for
>> a "known" painting is crazy but it won't go down in value. If one has
the
>> cash it makes much more sense to invest in an original than a
reproduction
>> that *will* go down in value.
>
> Classic paintings are different. It's highly unlikely that a shift in
> cultural attitudes will cause society to regard Rembrandt less highly in
> the future (which would depress the value of his paintings). His place
> in art history is assured, and the value of his work is assured. ...
Show full article (1.97Kb)
no comments