> "Anybody" anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
> news:230120080908102872%%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...

>> In article giganews.com>, "\(not
>> quite so\) Fat Sam" knox.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
>>

>>> Anybody wrote:

>>>> In article <13pa6l3jovui74b@corp.supernews.com>, "Steven L."
>>>> earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>

>>>>> The official Star Trek XI website has made available the teaser
>>>>> trailer for which a bootlegged version had already appeared on
>>>>> YouTube. There's more detail visible in the official version of
>>>>> course:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.paramount.com/startrek/

>>>>
>>>> ComingSoon.net has a couple of updates about the trailer on the
>>>> official website ...
>>>>
>>>> UPDATE:
>>>> In addition to the new trailer coming online in High
>>>> Definition quality, the official website has added a
>>>> red blinking light to the right of the words "UNDER
>>>> CONSTRUCTION", which, if clicked on, takes you to a
>>>> new viral site with the URL NCC-1701.com. It features
>>>> four cameras of the shipyard which you can bring into
>>>> focus by changing the frequency.
>>>>
>>>> UPDATE #2:
>>>> If you let the page sit long enough, the "offline"
>>>> camera on the page will show a corridor for just a
>>>> second!

>>>
>>> Oooooooh.
>>> I like this.

>>
>> It's a JJ Abrams trademarked idea - Lost has about 50zillion official
>> websites for fans to try to hunt for clues on, with each new season
>> bring a pile more of them.

>
> I'm worried. I've never watched Lost, not a single moment.....but I went and
> saw Cloverfield. It's unbelievably bad on every level. A complete
> failure.....I'm worried.