"Anybody"
anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
news:230120080908102872%%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...
> In article giganews.com>, "\(not
> quite so\) Fat Sam" knox.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Anybody wrote:
>>> In article <13pa6l3jovui74b@
corp.supernews.com>, "Steven L."
>>>
earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The official Star Trek XI website has made available the teaser
>>>> trailer for which a bootlegged version had already appeared on
>>>> YouTube. There's more detail visible in the official version of
>>>> course:
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.paramount.com/startrek/
>>>
>>>
ComingSoon.net has a couple of updates about the trailer on the
>>> official website ...
>>>
>>> UPDATE:
>>> In addition to the new trailer coming online in High
>>> Definition quality, the official website has added a
>>> red blinking light to the right of the words "UNDER
>>> CONSTRUCTION", which, if clicked on, takes you to a
>>> new viral site with the URL
NCC-1701.com. It features
>>> four cameras of the shipyard which you can bring into
>>> focus by changing the frequency.
>>>
>>> UPDATE #2:
>>> If you let the page sit long enough, the "offline"
>>> camera on the page will show a corridor for just a
>>> second!
>>
>> Oooooooh.
>> I like this.
>
> It's a JJ Abrams trademarked idea - Lost has about 50zillion official
> websites for fans to try to hunt for clues on, with each new season
> bring a pile more of them.
I'm worried. I've never watched Lost, not a single moment.....but I went and
saw Cloverfield. It's unbelievably bad on every level. A complete
failure.....I'm worried.